Wearing a camera

Commuting, Day rides, Audax, Incidents, etc.
thirdcrank
Posts: 21500
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm
Location: Gildersome, Sth Leeds

Re: Wearing a camera

Postby thirdcrank » 12 Feb 2014, 9:21am

Graham wrote:If I could get hold of a hi-vis vest printed, on the back, with
"Camera Running"
or
"Camera On"

I would certainly wear it. . . . . even though I don't carry a cam when riding !

Beware of dyslexic drivers. :shock: There are plenty of people who would relish the opportunity to abuse the prime minister (or worse.)
:wink:
Gang warily.

User avatar
Graham
Moderator
Posts: 4524
Joined: 14 Dec 2006, 8:48pm

Re: Wearing a camera

Postby Graham » 12 Feb 2014, 9:28am

:lol: Ta for the warning. It reminds me of a cycling jersey that I bought about 20 years ago.

It was advertising a european washing machine manufacturer FAGOR.

It was a rather nice design, but the number of people shouting out something a bit different put me off wearing it.

140212Fagor.jpg
140212Fagor.jpg (81.08 KiB) Viewed 600 times
Last edited by Graham on 12 Feb 2014, 12:44pm, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Final comment reconsidered and removed.

Geriatrix
Posts: 1852
Joined: 23 Oct 2007, 1:33pm
Location: Caterham

Re: Wearing a camera

Postby Geriatrix » 12 Feb 2014, 11:07am

Well it seems transport authorities are not against wearing cameras. Not with reminders like this :)
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled - Richard Feynman

mark1964
Posts: 24
Joined: 6 Jan 2012, 8:34pm

Re: Wearing a camera

Postby mark1964 » 26 Feb 2014, 1:25pm

gaz wrote:If fitting a camera makes motorists think twice about close overtakes why is their so much camera footage of close overtakes? :?

If your camera makes such a difference to the behaviour of other road users why are you seeing more RLJing cyclists? :wink:


Since getting my helmet cam, I note that drivers tend to give me a wide berth :D

Gearoidmuar
Posts: 2095
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 7:35pm
Location: Cork, Ireland. Corcaigh, Éire má tá Gaeilge agat.

Re: Wearing a camera

Postby Gearoidmuar » 2 Mar 2014, 7:46am

patricktaylor wrote:I think the judge's wig idea is better. All cyclists who don't have long blonde hair should wear a judge's wig.


Brilliant!

tandemtim
Posts: 1
Joined: 9 Jul 2010, 4:21pm

Re: Wearing a camera

Postby tandemtim » 28 Mar 2014, 5:25pm

Have just seen the interesting thread about cycle cameras in this months Cycle mag and coincidentally, having been thinking about getting a camera for either my solo road bike or our tandem (my wife is always squeaking as cars overtake too closely) I have just ordered a Fly6 rear facing camera with incorporated rear light. I saw this on the weekly London Cyclist email blog; see http://cyclingtips.com.au/2014/03/fly6- ... ht-review/ and https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/fl ... l-light-co
Unlike the Fly6 reviews I think it will be a long time till UK drivers recognise that they are being video'd, especially from the rear of a bike so I was thinking about getting a cycling jersey overprinted with something along the lines of "Smile - you are on camera". Do you think that this would be a good idea or would it just intensify driver road rage against cyclists?

RickH
Posts: 2606
Joined: 5 Mar 2012, 6:39pm
Location: Horwich, Lancs.

Re: Wearing a camera

Postby RickH » 28 Mar 2014, 6:17pm

tandemtim wrote:...I was thinking about getting a cycling jersey overprinted with something along the lines of "Smile - you are on camera". Do you think that this would be a good idea or would it just intensify driver road rage against cyclists?

You could always have the "standard" CCTV warning on your jersey (or a sign on the back of your bag/bike).
Image
(image linked from this page.)

Possibly more effective than the camera itself :twisted: - I've heard it said that the alarm box on a house is a bigger deterrent than the alarm system itself.

Rick.

User avatar
gentlegreen
Posts: 1359
Joined: 23 Aug 2010, 1:58pm
Location: Bristol
Contact:

Re: Wearing a camera

Postby gentlegreen » 28 Mar 2014, 8:38pm

I tend to go for being discrete which is why I put off replacing my torch-like cameras for so long - I won't be upgrading my rear camera until I've come up with a DIY housing.
Though I have long thought I need to come up with a number plate and "YOU TUBE" is one of the options ...

User avatar
661-Pete
Posts: 4840
Joined: 22 Nov 2012, 8:45pm

Re: Wearing a camera

Postby 661-Pete » 28 Mar 2014, 9:40pm

Graham wrote:It was advertising a european washing machine manufacturer FAGOR.
Plenty of precedent for that sort of mishap. When Mitsubishi brought in their 4x4 called the 'Pajero', they may not have appreciated what the word means in Spanish*. And there was a similar mix-up (slightly less obscene) with the Vauxhall Nova**.

Happily that sort of thing doesn't tend to happen so much with bikes and bike kit. Perhaps because the marketing guys have plenty of foreign language experience, and do their homework!

I often wonder why, as has been reported, the DVLA refused to sanction car registrations beginning with "SN07...". After all, the word it suggests is hardly the grossest obscenity in the English language.

* Put politely, I suppose it means 'someone who pleasures himself'. The English equivalent is what cyclists get called by angry motorists, and vice versa, rather a lot. :evil:
** "Doesn't Go!"
Pete
Warning: may contain horsemeat

Choose a password you can remember, such as qKe3?:zAbn2,7r>oOL9


Return to “On the road”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest