'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Commuting, Day rides, Audax, Incidents, etc.
User avatar
Guy951
Posts: 1536
Joined: 14 Jul 2009, 8:23am
Location: Mid Beds

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby Guy951 » 23 Apr 2014, 10:36am

leftpoole wrote:UPDATE
Following this topic I feel that the below link should make someone laugh at the very leaset!!!
John

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/1 ... _friendly/

I found this quite telling:
Police statistics for the past five years show there were nine pedestrians hit by cyclists between January 2008 and December 2012 and none of these incidents occurred in pedestrian areas.

In the same period, 638 cyclists were hit by vehicles and last year Bournemouth was labelled the second most dangerous place for cyclists outside of London.

With drivers like that around, who wouldn't ride on the path?
In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets, and steal loaves of bread.

User avatar
mjr
Posts: 5748
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby mjr » 23 Apr 2014, 10:55am

And that's with an unhelpful effect at work, too: if a council bans cycles from a street, most of those who continue to ride there are less likely to obey other laws/directions like giving way to pedestrians. There will be a few protestors like one of our councillors who disagrees with the decisions not to open a couple of quiet one-way and loading-only town centre streets to two-way cycling (shortening routes significantly and avoiding the stations gyratory) and rides them anyway, but generally it'll be the more reckless riders bombing on through.

Against that backdrop, no incidents in Bournemouth pedestrian zone is even more impressive.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.

leftpoole
Posts: 746
Joined: 12 Feb 2007, 9:31am
Location: Thornbury, South Gloucestershire.
Contact:

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby leftpoole » 23 Apr 2014, 1:24pm

Guy951 wrote:
leftpoole wrote:UPDATE
Following this topic I feel that the below link should make someone laugh at the very leaset!!!
John

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/1 ... _friendly/

I found this quite telling:
Police statistics for the past five years show there were nine pedestrians hit by cyclists between January 2008 and December 2012 and none of these incidents occurred in pedestrian areas.

In the same period, 638 cyclists were hit by vehicles and last year Bournemouth was labelled the second most dangerous place for cyclists outside of London.

With drivers like that around, who wouldn't ride on the path?


Hello,
I stick to the roads, but I am a very experienced road user ..I still feel more cycles on the road would help 'the cause'
Re The present 'government' I love the comment.
Best regards,
John

User avatar
gaz
Posts: 10962
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby gaz » 23 Apr 2014, 9:38pm

TRL Report PR 15, 1993, Cycling in Pedestrian Areas, concluded that cyclists and pedestrians mix well in "pedestrianised high streets and shopping areas".
It's only taken Bournemouth 21 years to catch up on the research :lol: , still much faster than some :roll: .

Cyclists are unlikely to be moving faster than pedestrians running and the risks of conflict are largely perceived rather than real. It should also be no harder to prosecute someone for careless/dangerous cycling than it is to prosecute them for violating a TRO prohibiting vehicles/cycles.
It's got nothing to do with vorsprung durch technic you know...

leftpoole
Posts: 746
Joined: 12 Feb 2007, 9:31am
Location: Thornbury, South Gloucestershire.
Contact:

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby leftpoole » 24 Apr 2014, 8:47am

gaz wrote:TRL Report PR 15, 1993, Cycling in Pedestrian Areas, concluded that cyclists and pedestrians mix well in "pedestrianised high streets and shopping areas".
It's only taken Bournemouth 21 years to catch up on the research :lol: , still much faster than some :roll: .

Cyclists are unlikely to be moving faster than pedestrians running and the risks of conflict are largely perceived rather than real. It should also be no harder to prosecute someone for careless/dangerous cycling than it is to prosecute them for violating a TRO prohibiting vehicles/cycles.


Hi
Cyclists unlikely to be moving faster than pedestrians you said?
Come and live here is 'Sunny Dorset' Bournemouth/Christchurch.............
More exciting cycling on pavement news below.
John


http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/1 ... ng_attack/

Mark1978
Posts: 4895
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 8:47am
Location: Chester-le-Street, County Durham

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby Mark1978 » 24 Apr 2014, 9:08am

beardy wrote:
PS: I had already taken a 65 mile route over hilly terrain instead of the flat direct 55 mile route, in order to avoid upsetting too many motorists with my presence.


That's nearly always the choice around here. Either quiet roads with lots of climbing or flat with lots of traffic.

One way around the issue is cycling on the pavements which are often alongside the flat but busy main roads. Such as I did alongside the A66 East of Darlington just yesterday. It was a shared use path and I didn't meet any pedestrians except for the highways agency landscapers.

TonyR
Posts: 5374
Joined: 31 Aug 2008, 12:51pm

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby TonyR » 24 Apr 2014, 11:20am

We really need to get rid of this local authority schizophrenia about cycling and pavements. Half the time they (along with the Highway Code) are encouraging us to cycle on them after they have applied no more than a bit of white paint and blue signs to an otherwise perfectly ordinary bit of pavement. The other half they are castigating and prosecuting cyclists for cycling on bits of pavements without the white paint.

I have seen no evidence that those have been chosen for conversion to shared use have anything about them that makes them specially suitable - they are wide and narrow, busy and quiet, past shops and in the countryside, maintained or breaking up...... So either pavements are all good to cycle on or none of them are. I just wish they'd make up their minds which it is.

User avatar
mjr
Posts: 5748
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby mjr » 24 Apr 2014, 1:52pm

No no no... the local authority encouraging people to cycle on footways that fall below the minimum standards for shared use is the left hand.

The police castigating and fining for riding on other footways, some of which are better than the shared use ones, is the right hand.

We need to introduce the left hand to the right hand... then make both listen to the brains of CTC and CN :-)
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.

User avatar
Vantage
Posts: 2336
Joined: 24 Jan 2012, 1:44pm
Location: sometimes Bolton, sometimes Urmston, usually lost
Contact:

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby Vantage » 24 Apr 2014, 3:33pm

This just occurred to me, but as much as I personally don't agree with pavement cycling unless its special circumstances, like keeping my 10yo and 7yo daughters off the road and alive, if peds are gonna complain about it, can I then complain about said peds who walk all over MY cyclepath when there's a perfectly useable footpath right next to it? And can I also complain and whine about said peds who've parked their cars all over the footpath when I'm walking with my kids?
Bill


“Ride as much or as little, or as long or as short as you feel. But ride.” ~ Eddy Merckx
I am not a cyclist. I am a Dad!

User avatar
mjr
Posts: 5748
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby mjr » 24 Apr 2014, 3:40pm

IrishBill76 wrote:can I then complain about said peds who walk all over MY cyclepath when there's a perfectly useable footpath right next to it?

You can complain, but no-one will care. I am still facing attempts to build footpaths between cycleways and roads when we've seen time and time again that people will walk as far away from the road as they can - on the cycleway - so it would be better to spend money widening that, rather than building a useless footpath between the two... but no, residents say they don't want to walk near those smelly aggressive cyclists and honestly would rather walk right next to those nice clean quiet cars hammering up the road. :shock:
And can I also complain and whine about said peds who've parked their cars all over the footpath when I'm walking with my kids?

Parking on the footpath is not a crime as long as it isn't actually obstructing anyone. It's the driving on the footway which is an offence but everyone parks their car by lifting it up and placing it there, as any police officer or court will tell you. ;-)
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.

reohn2
Posts: 23669
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby reohn2 » 24 Apr 2014, 5:25pm

leftpoole wrote:More exciting cycling on pavement news below.
John


http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/1 ... ng_attack/


Other than the victim of this despicable robbery riding a bicycle,what exactly does it have to do this thread? :?

kwackers
Posts: 10282
Joined: 4 Jun 2008, 9:29pm
Location: Warrington

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby kwackers » 25 Apr 2014, 8:30am

reohn2 wrote:Other than the victim of this despicable robbery riding a bicycle,what exactly does it have to do this thread? :?

She was cycling too slow on the pavement, at 25mph nobody stops you to ask for the time. :wink:

Postboxer
Posts: 1042
Joined: 24 Jul 2013, 5:19pm

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby Postboxer » 25 Apr 2014, 9:16am

Was she on the pavement? It is a despicable crime though, filthy scum!

kwackers
Posts: 10282
Joined: 4 Jun 2008, 9:29pm
Location: Warrington

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby kwackers » 25 Apr 2014, 9:20am

Postboxer wrote:Was she on the pavement? It is a despicable crime though, filthy scum!

An assumption on my part, I don't actually know.

reohn2
Posts: 23669
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: 'Real' Cyclists as opposed to people riding cycles?

Postby reohn2 » 25 Apr 2014, 9:25am

kwackers wrote:
Postboxer wrote:Was she on the pavement? It is a despicable crime though, filthy scum!

An assumption on my part, I don't actually know.

Nor me,nor the OP,going off the linked report :?


Return to “On the road”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests