Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
-
- Posts: 635
- Joined: 14 Jul 2007, 2:10pm
- Location: Winchester, Hants
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
You may be right Jonathan.
I just read on the GCN+ website "Sagan subsequently underwent an ablation procedure to correct arrhythmias in his heart"
Perhaps I put 2 and 2 together and got 5 but I still think 2 ablations isn't a good sign.
I just read on the GCN+ website "Sagan subsequently underwent an ablation procedure to correct arrhythmias in his heart"
Perhaps I put 2 and 2 together and got 5 but I still think 2 ablations isn't a good sign.
-
- Posts: 2929
- Joined: 11 Jan 2007, 12:20pm
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
Very common.
In the days when I could shrug off my AF I didn't take much notice, but since my AF got much worse in 2020 I've had to sleep on my right side only for about the last two years because it's completely intolerable otherwise.
It's fairly common to need 2 or even 3 for AF, and then a PVI is only about 70% successful IIRC. On the other hand, a CTI for atrial flutter is much quicker, simpler, and higher success rate though.
“I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche
― Friedrich Nietzsche
-
- Posts: 635
- Joined: 14 Jul 2007, 2:10pm
- Location: Winchester, Hants
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
Perhaps I am basing this too much on my own experience. I was only offered 1 ablation and my cardiologist expressed some surprise that I had stayed in SR for longer than he expected after that ablation.
Hopefully Mr S will be able to compete again but I think we are talking about a completely different level of stress on the heart for that but again I may be wrong.
Hopefully Mr S will be able to compete again but I think we are talking about a completely different level of stress on the heart for that but again I may be wrong.
-
- Posts: 2929
- Joined: 11 Jan 2007, 12:20pm
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
I was offered an ablation for my AF ten years ago, and I'm still waiting for it.brianleach wrote: ↑20 Mar 2024, 7:19amI was only offered 1 ablation and my cardiologist expressed some surprise that I had stayed in SR for longer than he expected after that ablation.
“I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche
― Friedrich Nietzsche
-
- Posts: 635
- Joined: 14 Jul 2007, 2:10pm
- Location: Winchester, Hants
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
I believe it is a very expensive procedure so with the present state of the NHS that does not come as any surprise sadly.I was offered an ablation for my AF ten years ago, and I'm still waiting for it
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
The current (!) cost-effectiveness analysis from NICE:brianleach wrote: ↑20 Mar 2024, 12:51pmI believe it is a very expensive procedure so with the present state of the NHS that does not come as any surprise sadly.
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196/ ... 6949243734
Jonathan
-
- Posts: 635
- Joined: 14 Jul 2007, 2:10pm
- Location: Winchester, Hants
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
Thank you but far too complicated for me Jonathan!
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
It's not an easy calculation because of the number of options and the ignorance about many outcomes, including avoidance of stroke.
Here's the bottom line:
The committee acknowledged that the NHS reference cost used for the catheter ablation procedures may not fully capture differences in resource use between the different techniques. However, despite further analysis to adjust costs and account for this, radiofrequency point‑by‑point ablation remained the most cost‑effective option, and other catheter ablation techniques are therefore unlikely to provide a cost‑effective use of NHS resources. Based on the economic model results the committee agreed that radiofrequency point‑by‑point ablation should be considered in people with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation if drug treatment is unsuccessful, unsuitable or not tolerated.
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196/ ... l-ablation
Jonathan
Here's the bottom line:
The committee acknowledged that the NHS reference cost used for the catheter ablation procedures may not fully capture differences in resource use between the different techniques. However, despite further analysis to adjust costs and account for this, radiofrequency point‑by‑point ablation remained the most cost‑effective option, and other catheter ablation techniques are therefore unlikely to provide a cost‑effective use of NHS resources. Based on the economic model results the committee agreed that radiofrequency point‑by‑point ablation should be considered in people with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation if drug treatment is unsuccessful, unsuitable or not tolerated.
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196/ ... l-ablation
Jonathan
-
- Posts: 635
- Joined: 14 Jul 2007, 2:10pm
- Location: Winchester, Hants
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
Thank you for highlighting the salient part. I see they refer to radiofrequency ablations. I thought they used a laser. Perhaps that is the same thing as I am not a scientist. As I said I think it is unlikely I will ever be offered another one so I suppose it is academic.
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
No, that's a different technology. And that range of options makes decisions much harder. In this analysis they included:brianleach wrote: ↑20 Mar 2024, 1:22pm Thank you for highlighting the salient part. I see they refer to radiofrequency ablations. I thought they used a laser.
...
2.1.1 Comparators
Twelve comparators were selected for the model:
• Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) (split into six comparators to allow for cross over to each
ablation technique outlined below if AF symptoms recur within first year)
• Radiofrequency point by point (RF PP) catheter ablation
• Radiofrequency multi-electrode (RF ME) catheter ablation
• Cryoballoon catheter ablation
• Laser catheter ablation
• Thoracoscopy
• Hybrid ablation (thoracoscopy and radiofrequency point by point catheter ablation)
Jonathan
-
- Posts: 635
- Joined: 14 Jul 2007, 2:10pm
- Location: Winchester, Hants
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
I didn't realise there were so many choices! I definitely had the laser catheter ablation option. It took me about a month to fully recover from the anesthetic!
-
- Posts: 2929
- Joined: 11 Jan 2007, 12:20pm
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
I can do nothing but sit in this chair all day and every day, it's ruining my life. That wasn't the case when they offered it to me in July 2013.
“I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche
― Friedrich Nietzsche
-
- Posts: 635
- Joined: 14 Jul 2007, 2:10pm
- Location: Winchester, Hants
Re: Atrial Fibrillation...Should We Worry
Sorry to hear this. Obviously your condition is far worse than mine as at least I can still do some local rides although I cannot go out with even the easy rides group locally as I need to go at my own pace.I can do nothing but sit in this chair all day and every day, it's ruining my life