Problem is I don’t have to look that far, or even on social media. I have been spat at, had deliberate close passes, cans of drink thrown at me and shouted at. And it seems to be getting worse.
CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
While not trying to suggest this isn't a problem, it's important to realise that anecdotes are not necessarily representative. I know people it happens to, I know people it doesn't happen to. Just about all the anger I've attracted for some time now is eejits incensed that I'm not wearing a helmet!
And none of this is particularly relevant off-road, of course, or to whether one shouldn't think of going without a lid while you're there.
Pete.
Often seen riding a bike around Dundee...
-
- Posts: 2749
- Joined: 4 Jan 2009, 4:31pm
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
https://rcaforum.org.nz/wp-content/uplo ... d-2017.pdf
provides some information of relative risk. Abstract reads
provides some information of relative risk. Abstract reads
There data probably includes BTM.We compared the injury risks of typical exposures to road cycling for transport with other
common activities including do-it-yourself repairs (DIY) at home, horse riding, quad bike
riding, rugby union and snow sports in New Zealand. Cycling on the road half an hour
three times a week was similar to DIY twice a month and safer than horse riding 1.5 h
twice a week (5-fold difference in injury claims), skiing half a day for 4–5 times per year
(140-fold), and playing rugby once every 3 weeks (530-fold difference). In statistical
terms, based on moderate injuries, cycling is less dangerous than many recreational and
every day activities. We conclude that fear of cycling in car-dependent New Zealand arises
mainly from other causes than risk of injury, associated with the marginal status of cyclists on the public road.
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
This is none too surprising as we all know there's a difference between perceived danger and actual risk. The obvious case in point is the close pass, which creates very few injuries (it might be close but it's still a pass and not an impact) but feels quite horrible and is genuinely off-putting to those who haven't normalised it through experience. Survey after survey in the UK has fear as a leading cause of not cycling.Steady rider wrote: ↑2 Nov 2022, 7:03pmIn statistical terms, based on moderate injuries, cycling is less dangerous than many recreational and
every day activities. We conclude that fear of cycling in car-dependent New Zealand arises
mainly from other causes than risk of injury, associated with the marginal status of cyclists on the public road.
The "marginal status" noted above is what goes away with safety in numbers. I'm sure there are Dutch drivers who wish cyclists had a marginal status, but the numbers on the ground make that a non-starter.
Again, we have drifted away from whether helmets are a "no-brainer" for off-road.
Pete.
Often seen riding a bike around Dundee...
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
Didn't Walker do that (in terms of passing distance) some years back in his 'blonde wig' paper?
"42"
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
Didn't Walker do that (in terms of passing distance) some years back in his 'blonde wig' paper?
"42"
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
That quantified passing distance which is one aspect of "noticed" and "treated better", but only one. One of those things where you measure what you can measure and some measurement is better than none but that doesn't give all the information you really need.
Pete.
Often seen riding a bike around Dundee...
-
- Posts: 36781
- Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
With apologies for quoting myself (how sad can somebody get?) but perhaps the entire forum membership has me on their foe list.thirdcrank wrote: ↑28 Oct 2022, 12:48pmCongratulations on ploughing through all that guff. As this thread has dragged on, I eventually looked back at the article in question, apparently written by somebody described as a "digital officer". The advice quoted above seems to originate with one Shane Giddings of Swinley Bike Hub, some sort of off-road trail centre. One of the services they market is bike hire which includes thispjclinch wrote: ↑26 Oct 2022, 10:53am CUK are generally pretty good on lids, but they have a "How to" for MTB at https://www.cyclinguk.org/article/how-g ... ad-cycling that contains...
Oh dear.Invest in a good helmet. Mountain biking is a challenging and sometimes dangerous sport, and you want to make sure your head is protected. Knee pads can also reduce the likelihood of injury.
Shane advises: “A helmet is vital! Don’t even think about riding off road without a helmet. Even the smallest of crashes can cause significant head injuries, so before anything, get yourself a decent helmet.”
Perhaps worth noting that the article is a general one covering everything from easy Landy tracks at a leisurely pace to bonkers downhill, so quite a broad range of contexts.
I've sent in a moan, if you're not a fan of advice given bereft of context and nuance like the above I'd suggest you might too.
Pete.https://www.swinleybikehub.com/hireALL BIKES COME WITH HELMET HIRE INCLUDED. ALTERNATIVELY, YOU ARE WELCOME TO USE YOUR OWN
In the lingo, I think this is called advertorial.
IMO, the big danger here is that some lazy hack looking to stir up a bit of controversy will quote the article mentioned in the OP as being CyclingUK policy when it's just stuff cobbled together to fill space.
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
Fair comment.thirdcrank wrote: ↑3 Nov 2022, 12:10pm IMO, the big danger here is that some lazy hack looking to stir up a bit of controversy will quote the article mentioned in the OP as being CyclingUK policy when it's just stuff cobbled together to fill space.
Current state of play is the CUK person who put it up got back to me saying they can't change quotes (as then they wouldn't be quotes), but they could clarify CUK helmet policy and I could say something myself to add.
I've suggested in response that they'd be better off having Roger Geffen say something than me (i.e., someone with some CUK heft who is known to know the subject well, rather than what amounts to Some Random with a Bonnet-Bee off the Interweb) and it would be worth running the whole thing past him anyway. I also said that while you can't change quotes you can simply remove them...
Pete.
Often seen riding a bike around Dundee...
-
- Posts: 36781
- Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
Thanks. There does seem to be a lot of good stuff in the thread, but quoting and requoting can lead to all manner of myths. Older readers may remember that when Paul Boateng was David Blunkett's gopher he gave a parliamentary answer about the extension of fixed penalties to cycling on a footway. A fob off answer about police discretion was so distorted by sloppy quoting that it was being advanced as a government ban on the offence being enforced.pjclinch wrote: ↑3 Nov 2022, 1:28pmFair comment.thirdcrank wrote: ↑3 Nov 2022, 12:10pm IMO, the big danger here is that some lazy hack looking to stir up a bit of controversy will quote the article mentioned in the OP as being CyclingUK policy when it's just stuff cobbled together to fill space.
Current state of play is the CUK person who put it up got back to me saying they can't change quotes (as then they wouldn't be quotes), but they could clarify CUK helmet policy and I could say something myself to add.
I've suggested in response that they'd be better off having Roger Geffen say something than me (i.e., someone with some CUK heft who is known to know the subject well, rather than what amounts to Some Random with a Bonnet-Bee off the Interweb) and it would be worth running the whole thing past him anyway. I also said that while you can't change quotes you can simply remove them...
===========================================
PS Forgot to say
IIRC when Kevin Mayne was IC the CTC, he refused to take a position on helmets because of the divided views of the membership. ie Nothing based on scientific research
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
Oooh, maybe CUK can repeal the force of gravity on a few hills using nothing but The Power of Democracy!thirdcrank wrote: ↑3 Nov 2022, 1:37pm IIRC when Kevin Mayne was IC the CTC, he refused to take a position on helmets because of the divided views of the membership. ie Nothing based on scientific research
Often seen riding a bike around Dundee...
-
- Posts: 36781
- Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
That's not what I meant. Somebody with a better memory than mine may confirm what I was saying, which was that KM took the line that the CTC as a membership organisation should be agnostic (?) on compulsory helmets because of the strongly divided view of the membership. There's no reason IMO why CUK - as a charity committed to promoting cycling - should not be involved in helmet research etc. Indeed the results might identify eg barriers to cycling. But I do feel that as an organisation likely to be quoted, then it should be more cautious about the guff you quoted in your OPpjclinch wrote: ↑3 Nov 2022, 1:50pmOooh, maybe CUK can repeal the force of gravity on a few hills using nothing but The Power of Democracy!thirdcrank wrote: ↑3 Nov 2022, 1:37pm IIRC when Kevin Mayne was IC the CTC, he refused to take a position on helmets because of the divided views of the membership. ie Nothing based on scientific research
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
Sorry, I was just having a sarcastic aside about how peoples' opinions in the face of actual evidence can be given far too much weight. I think we are in Furious Agreement.thirdcrank wrote: ↑3 Nov 2022, 2:01pmThat's not what I meant.pjclinch wrote: ↑3 Nov 2022, 1:50pmOooh, maybe CUK can repeal the force of gravity on a few hills using nothing but The Power of Democracy!thirdcrank wrote: ↑3 Nov 2022, 1:37pm IIRC when Kevin Mayne was IC the CTC, he refused to take a position on helmets because of the divided views of the membership. ie Nothing based on scientific research
Often seen riding a bike around Dundee...
Re: CUK dropping the ball with MTB advice
Very few cyclists and potential cyclists care about the helmet debate. Wear one if you want to, don't if you don'tSurvey after survey in the UK has fear as a leading cause of not cycling.
These'll be the same ones that really ought to be concentrating on their driving/riding rather than on what someone is or isn't wearingJust about all the anger I've attracted for some time now is eejits incensed that I'm not wearing a helmet!
~~~~¯\(ツ)/¯~~~~