Actually no, I have used those exact words on many occasions. Ask anyone who's been on my Wednesday night rides. (Except I don't use the word $*&^ 'cos I'm polite like that.) It varies, though. If I'm in a good mood I may simply threaten to tear the light from any offender's handlebars and jump up and down on it repeatedly on it while shouting "Make it stop, make it stop." (This is all covered on the advanced ride leader course.)
Search found 1469 matches
- 18 Mar 2024, 11:32pm
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Would it be unreasonable … ?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 363
Re: Would it be unreasonable … ?
- 18 Mar 2024, 5:05pm
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Would it be unreasonable … ?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 363
Re: Would it be unreasonable … ?
- 18 Mar 2024, 4:44pm
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Would it be unreasonable … ?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 363
Re: Would it be unreasonable … ?
I generally go for throwing one arm across my eyes and screaming "AAAGH! MY EYES! THE PAIN! I CAN'T SEE!!! MAKE THE FLASHING LIGHTS GO AWAY!!!"nirakaro wrote: ↑18 Mar 2024, 4:29pm I went for a nice ride along the towpath today, sunny afternoon, lovely quiet space, everything just starting to burst into leaf. The only (small) fly in the ointment was the occasional cyclist coming towards me with a dazzling flashing front light. There’s always one or two. I mean. Part of the reason for going to such places is to get away for a bit from that twenty-first-century sensory overload; so would I be out of order, or over the top, or unreasonable if I stopped them, pointed out the incongruity, and politely suggested that they turn it off?
But each to their own.
When I lead member group evening rides in the summer, regulars know that there are just two house rules.:
The Winchester CTC house rule: After dusk, make sure your rear light is on steady mode, not flashing.
AndyK's house rule: If you put your $*&^-off big trillion-lumen front light into flashing mode while you're on my ride, you will find your light being used to illuminate that place where the sun don't shine.
- 18 Mar 2024, 11:40am
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: How to Move saddlepack further back
- Replies: 5
- Views: 314
Re: How to Move saddlepack further back
Is it a strap-on bag (oo-er) or does it use Topeak's QuickClip attachment system? If it's a QuickClip bag then this may do the job: Topeak F33. It's sold as being for sprung saddles, but it looks like an extended version of the standard bracket so it should work with a standard saddle 0 as the review on that page seems to confirm. There's also an even longer Fixer 1A if you're desperate.
- 15 Mar 2024, 6:37pm
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Cycle Retail In Meltdown.
- Replies: 181
- Views: 23035
Re: Cycle Retail In Meltdown.
Citation needed, as they say on Wikipedia. The only reference I can find for that statement is another thread on this very forum 5 years ago. According to press reports Marin were bought by European-based investment company Minestone in 2012 and I can't see anything since to say that's changed.Bonzo Banana wrote: ↑15 Mar 2024, 6:11pm Marin has been for quite a few years a Indonesian brand as it was bought by Insera Sena who also have their own inhouse brand Polygon.
- 12 Mar 2024, 10:12pm
- Forum: Campaigning & Public Policy
- Topic: Filthy bridleway
- Replies: 56
- Views: 2111
Re: Filthy bridleway
That's the one. Your Streetview pegman is standing on the border between Southampton City Council and Hampshire County Council. If you turn it around 180 degrees and go a few clicks south, you'll find yourself on a surfaced public road maintained by SCC.pwa wrote: ↑12 Mar 2024, 10:31am
If the track discussed here were just a bridleway, I'd be inclined to say that the mud is just something to put up with at this time of year, if the landowner isn't minded to allow upgrading. The law does not require bridleways to be cyclable. But as it is in fact restricted byway, the legal situation may be different. I don't know.
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.9473616 ... ?entry=ttu
This looks like the area concerned.
Maybe this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rhby3SjzsZw
Practical differences between bridleways and restricted byways (RBs) as I understand it:
- Horse-drawn carriages may use RBs.
- RBs may not be ploughed up for planting, whereas bridleways and footpaths may be. (Highways Act 1980. Should be restored within 14 days.)
- Different minimum width requirements. Default minimum width for a bridleway that's not along a field edge is 2m. RBs, Byways Open To All Traffic (BOATs) and bridleways along a field edge must be at least 3m wide. (HA 1980 again)
Otherwise, much the same. The landowner has no responsibility to maintain the surface to a particular standard. If the council were to adopt it as a maintained road - even an "unsurfaced" one - that would be different. But it would then be a highway, not just a right-of-way, and it would be the council's responsibility to look after it.
I think a lot of the confusion comes from the use of the word "byway", which has quite a loose definition in normal speech but a very limited one in law.
- 10 Mar 2024, 8:19pm
- Forum: Campaigning & Public Policy
- Topic: Filthy bridleway
- Replies: 56
- Views: 2111
Re: Filthy bridleway
It's in HCC territory (just). As soon as you cross the border into Southampton at the southern end, it becomes a tarmac road. At the northern end it also transforms into a tarmac road.basingstoke123 wrote: ↑10 Mar 2024, 12:24am I also do not fully understand the difference between a public footpath and a 'normal' footpath within a town. Or a bridleway and a cycle path. You often get the odd public right of way in addition to all the usual footpaths (and very occasionally a cycle path). What's the difference? AFAIK the public rights of way existed before the area was developed and were never legally extinguished.
Public footpaths and bridleways are rights of way. Nothing more. They are great for leisure use, to explore the wonderful countryside that we have.
Generally they are not suitable for utility use such as commuting or getting to your local shops, whether walking or cycling.
To me, the issue is not that the bridleway is muddy but that there is a lack of a suitable cycle route (or footway?). I suspect that it will be unlikely to get a bridleway or public footpath improved, unless it is actually blocked. What is needed is a suitable cycle path and footpath which could run along the route of the bridleway.
Is the bridleway in HCC or Southampton? Is it an identified possible route in a relevant LCWIP? Could it be added?
Unfortunately HCC is not very cycling (or walking) friendly, although this is changing, slowly. The occasional major road scheme will now sometimes include cycle facilities with funding from central government. But there is no interest (or money) for anything minor.
The relevant LCWIP is the Test Valley (South) LCWIP and as far as I can see it isn't identified as a route for development in that. The LCWIP recognises the importance of a properly-surfaced, safe cycle route to the Chilworth business park, but sadly not from that particular direction. It does propose a route from North Baddesley through to Chilworth vilage, passing through the science park on the way. Once you get to Chilworth village tyou're in Southampton City Council territory so it's presumably down to them.
To be fair, that route (no. 264 in the report) is in their top 5 high-priority routes, so there'/s every chance the nonexistent funding might go there first.
If that route is established then it would offer a suitable route to Chilworth, but one that's not convenient for the OP or for anyone living on the west side of Southampton who wants to cycle-commute to the Science Park. That matters because it's a major employment area so it needs good active travel routes from surrounding towns and cities.
- 10 Mar 2024, 7:59pm
- Forum: Campaigning & Public Policy
- Topic: Filthy bridleway
- Replies: 56
- Views: 2111
Re: Filthy bridleway
There are some good suggestions here about who to contact in general, but seriously, for this particular path I think Mykidsdad would be re-treading old ground. He's much better off contacting the local campaigners to start with to find out what's already happened, so he knows where to direct his efforts.
- 10 Mar 2024, 7:57pm
- Forum: Campaigning & Public Policy
- Topic: Filthy bridleway
- Replies: 56
- Views: 2111
Re: Filthy bridleway
Ah, but things moved on after that.Mykidsdad wrote: ↑10 Mar 2024, 8:56am Also read a 1995 Hampshire CC report where it was proposed to redesignate the path as a restricted byway. Loved the determination shown by the landowner:
"I have been quietly working to try to stop cyclists from bicycling over the footpath, and at last the Forestry Commission have padlocked their gate. Mr Rathbone has approached the Administration Manager at the Chilworth Research Centre and asked for co-operation to inform their employees that they are not entitled to cycle along the track and this has had a considerable measure of success. I estimate I have reduced the incidents of bicycling from approximately a hundred a day to a hard core of about ten who dispute their right to cycle over the footpath.”
100 a day... Blimey.
Here's a formal report to the HCC Regulatory Committee in 2013, recommending that the Definitive Map of rights of way be redrawn to show Lordswood Lane as a restricted byway, ratehr than a footpath. It provides a potted history of the path dating back to 1755 to support its conclusion, which (I believe) was accepted by the Committee - and that's why HCC's Definitive Map now shows it as a restricted byway, as do current OS maps. https://www.hants.gov.uk/get-decision-d ... f&type=pdf
Incidentally, when a council does this, it doesn't mean it's decided to "upgrade" the path's status. What it means is that someone (either the council itself or a "claimant") has amassed enough historical evidence to show that it's always been regarded as a byway (or bridleway etc.) over many years, and should have been shown as such on the Definitive Map to start with. Marking it as a footpath was a mistake, so the Definitive Map needs to be corrected.
- 9 Mar 2024, 4:06pm
- Forum: Campaigning & Public Policy
- Topic: Filthy bridleway
- Replies: 56
- Views: 2111
Re: Filthy bridleway
You're talking about Lordswood Lane, yes? Running south-north across Chilworth Common and over the motorway? It's a bit out of my area but I think there's a history behind that piece of bridleway. (It's actually a restricted byway, by the way.) There may well be plans - probably unfunded at the moment - to do something with it. Worth contacting Cycling UK CAN local rep Jim Probert - I'm fairly sure he'll know more.. Contact link on the map halfway down this page: https://www.cyclinguk.org/cycle-campaig ... cy-network
- 8 Mar 2024, 12:01pm
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Cycle Show 2024 Cancelled. Alternatives
- Replies: 18
- Views: 1381
Re: Cycle Show 2024 Cancelled. Alternatives
For what it's worth, I just noticed that Cycling UK members can claim free weekend tickets for this show - up to two per member:bikepacker wrote: ↑4 Mar 2024, 11:09amThe current exhibitors list doesn't inspire me to go.TrevA wrote: ↑4 Mar 2024, 10:15am I think the NEC one is still on.
https://nationalcyclingshow.com/
Though the last time I went, it was mostly obscure Chinese e-bikes, not much to interest the road and touring market.
https://www.cyclinguk.org/member-benefi ... cling-show
... though I have to agree that the exhibitors list doesn't grab me either. Never heard of most of them. But if you happen to live in the area and can get a ticket for free, it might be worth a visit. You never know, there may be freebies!
- 3 Mar 2024, 6:22pm
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Routing online or via "knowledge" ?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 1867
Re: Routing online or via "knowledge" ?
Moderator note - post removed for breach of Forum Guidelines.
- 27 Feb 2024, 11:29am
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: rwgps ride reports query
- Replies: 9
- Views: 749
Re: rwgps
Ooh, Mattheus is right. I hadn't noticed that feature slipping in.
It does work, kind of, but you have to make your ride Public first (not the route, the ride) then you can create a report with text, map and photos. It doesn't automatically link back to the corresponding route but you could put a link in. And it does require the reporter to have a premium account - or, presumably, be a user in a Club account. Other users can add comments below the report.
A quick example (most of my rides are set as Private for obvious reasons, so I had to go back to 2017):
https://ridewithgps.com/ride_reports/96 ... ash-return
It does work, kind of, but you have to make your ride Public first (not the route, the ride) then you can create a report with text, map and photos. It doesn't automatically link back to the corresponding route but you could put a link in. And it does require the reporter to have a premium account - or, presumably, be a user in a Club account. Other users can add comments below the report.
A quick example (most of my rides are set as Private for obvious reasons, so I had to go back to 2017):
https://ridewithgps.com/ride_reports/96 ... ash-return
- 27 Feb 2024, 10:24am
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: rwgps ride reports query
- Replies: 9
- Views: 749
Re: rwgps
IN a word, no. Not a library of past rides with reports.
It's good for building libraries of routes. Our group does this in a free RWGPS account using the Collections feature, which is available to free users. Here's the 30-40 mile collection, for instance:
https://ridewithgps.com/collections/231 ... io0oe4xefE
We have a "Routes" page on our main website that provides an introduction and links to each of the collections:
https://winchesterctc.org.uk/local-routes
When viewing a route as a logged-in user (free or otherwise) you can add comments to a route, so I guess you could use that or the Review option (currently in beta) to add notes about individual rides, but not photos. But it's not ideal.
I look at the RWGPS Club Accounts offering every couple of years, both in my role as a club committee member and as the owner of a cycle tour company. In both roles, to date, I haven't considered it worth the money. It does lots of clever stuff that we don't need. One thing it doesn't do (or didn't last time I looked) is provide what you wanted: a way to file ride reports with photos.
Incidentally Cycling UK Wantage are very good at this. Their ride records include options for the leader to add a report after the ride, together with a record of everyone who attended the ride. (I thought it did photos as well, but I can't see any right now). However I think their system is entirely home-grown, though It uses RWGPS for route storage.
For example: https://cyclingukwantage.org.uk/rides.php?id=8827
It's good for building libraries of routes. Our group does this in a free RWGPS account using the Collections feature, which is available to free users. Here's the 30-40 mile collection, for instance:
https://ridewithgps.com/collections/231 ... io0oe4xefE
We have a "Routes" page on our main website that provides an introduction and links to each of the collections:
https://winchesterctc.org.uk/local-routes
When viewing a route as a logged-in user (free or otherwise) you can add comments to a route, so I guess you could use that or the Review option (currently in beta) to add notes about individual rides, but not photos. But it's not ideal.
I look at the RWGPS Club Accounts offering every couple of years, both in my role as a club committee member and as the owner of a cycle tour company. In both roles, to date, I haven't considered it worth the money. It does lots of clever stuff that we don't need. One thing it doesn't do (or didn't last time I looked) is provide what you wanted: a way to file ride reports with photos.
Incidentally Cycling UK Wantage are very good at this. Their ride records include options for the leader to add a report after the ride, together with a record of everyone who attended the ride. (I thought it did photos as well, but I can't see any right now). However I think their system is entirely home-grown, though It uses RWGPS for route storage.
For example: https://cyclingukwantage.org.uk/rides.php?id=8827
- 22 Feb 2024, 11:17am
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: 'Easier' chainrings for Shimano 5800 - how?
- Replies: 41
- Views: 2478
Re: 'Easier' chainrings for Shimano 5800 - how?
Good point. I generally use either Scott-Mathauser Salmon pads (excellent), Elvedes white (possibly even better, but fast-wearing) or Fibrax dual-compound (not quite as good, but fine)Cyclothesist wrote: ↑21 Feb 2024, 3:52pm I have Tektro R539 brakes on my Kinesis GF Ti V2 paired with ST5700 brifters and they work very well together stopping as well as my Spyre disk braked bike in the dry.
If using that combination your braking is poor I'd be looking at the state of the cables and outers as well as the block compound.