pwa wrote:Separate brake levers from gear levers.
Thanks, yes, this looks like a good option.
pwa wrote:Separate brake levers from gear levers.
ElCani wrote:
What shifters and drivetrain do you have at the moment? What’s wrong with them? Knowing this will help people help you come up with a workable upgrade/replacement strategy.
Cheers!
eileithyia wrote:Ouch! Thoughts with the families and friends.
irc wrote:No different from giving air time to other politicians who aren't qualified to say what climate change is doing or not doing..
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26133915
Anyway scientists aren't always right. In the 70s some scientists told us the climate was cooling.
mrjemm wrote:The chonkin' chef's nasty old Dad has been quiet lately. Has his denialist's support group died a death after even Camerwrong suggested such weather's down to CC?
Lord Lawson wrote:On Wednesday, Lord Lawson a former Conservative chancellor who regularly casts doubt on climate science, also criticised suggestions of a link between the floods and global warming as absurd.
ukdodger wrote:Jesus I hope not.
It is, but Venice is city on a lagoon so its flooding problems are tidal related rather than due precipitation so its a different problem.ukdodger wrote:Isnt Venice on stilts?
kwackers wrote:I might be wrong here but I'm more of the opinion that virtually non-stop heavy rain has more to do with the flooding than pretty much anything else.
NATURAL ANKLING wrote:"thirdcrank" we all respect your professional opinions which give us such balanced views of whats happening in law terms.
Its just I find it sometimes hard to follow your well versed lingo (comes from your job) in law speak.
No disrespect I just have to read several times to understand, not sure we / you can change that, we might just get it watered down, I know you do alot of explaining for us joe bloggs. Thanks.
patricktaylor wrote:Cameron's "whatever money is needed, we will spend it" leaves open the question of what is needed. Lord Smith has talked about the economic benefit of flood defences and if there isn't any, no money. There must surely be more criteria than purely economic benefit. After all, it's not a new project like HS2 - the homes affected are things that already exist.
Judge: jury must be applying physical facts but
could also consider expectations; is there an expectation that there wouldn’t be a cyclist on
Mountbatten Way? Jury will be directed to ignore Highway Code “slow down or stop if dazzled” as
Mr Petterson may not have done this but Highway Code is not law. Causation and contributory factor
are different.