Pinhead wrote: ↑4 Sep 2023, 5:40pm
I agree to a point but, this is just a FIRST page not 5/10 or page 20 so the original post is there to see "in bold", People (I assume like you, are quick to attack, which is why as an AUTISTIC person I make my questions as 100% clear as possible TOP avoid false replies.
Perhaps you can advise on how to word a question and receive only applicable replies
I had a post deleted because I posted a reply that was about UNISEX saddles and not a direct reply to a post that was "posted" about a specific saddle
What is the difference
I stated NOT ride to work so why post a reply commenting on Ride to work ?
I also received a PM a month back from someone who said "Why people reply to questions that have NOT been asked, saying", "Don't people read the question before posting ?"
When the same thing happened, I asked about "X" and received a reply nothing to do with the question even though I said NOT THIS xxxxx
Well, as an AUTISTIC person myself, I suggest you might want to get over yourself and wind your neck in a little…
As has been pointed out by others, access to work grants are *not* predicated on “ride to work” they are quite specifically targeted at things that facilitate work - for example an adapted E-bike for use *at* work - so, since, your claim is that you make your questions “100% clear”, then my answer is equally “100% correct” - if you wanted to exclude answers regarding use of E-bikes *at work* then you really should have said that, shouldn’t you?
If your proposed use is entirely predicated on leisure and recreation, then you may want to look at whether you qualify for PIP, which is also tied in with the motability scheme for those with higher levels of impairment, but also a lower rate (covering both physical impairments and other neurological/psychological/psychiatric impairments) that could be used to fund the purchase of an E-bike or similar.