Search found 111 matches

by John Catt
5 Feb 2013, 6:20pm
Forum: CTC Charity Debate
Topic: Bragging about being a charity.
Replies: 5
Views: 64233

Re: Bragging about being a charity.

regoak wrote:It is also a bit demaeaning for charities that operate for welfare and health purposes, having an organisation primarily operating for leisure purposes having themselves parade as an equal.
OK the accountants have succeeded in getting the CTC a tax break etc, but dont flaunt it in such a banal way.


I'd point out that many of these "welfare and health" charities see cycling (which is what CTC promotes as a charity) as complementary in helping reduce the need of their services.

Lack of exercise results in:

Poor transfer of oxygen through blood to the cells.
Increased risk of cancer. Active people face less risk.
Diabetes. Insulin sensitivity is increased due to lack of exercise.
Obesity, which leads to several health problems.
Heart diseases.
Strokes. Regular exercise lowers blood pressure, reduces the risk of blood clots and raises HDL cholesterol.
The chances of cognitive decline or dementia. These are seen less in active people.
Loss of muscle mass.
Osteoporosis.

Take a look at what that notable health charity the British Heart Foundation has to say about cycling - http://www.bhf.org.uk/heart_matters_online/april_may_2011/activity/cycling.aspx

I would suggest that the CTC, if it succeeds in increasing cycling levels to those seen in many countries on the Continent, will deliver a larger health benefit than most individual health charities.
by John Catt
14 Jan 2013, 6:20pm
Forum: Cycling UK Topics and Discussions
Topic: membership
Replies: 77
Views: 151551

Re: membership

Gunner wrote:I have read all threse threads with interest, I was seriously thinking of joining both my wife and I as life members but now having second thoughts :shock:


Looks as if taking out life membership if you ride with Nuneaton could be a good investment - http://www.nuneatoncycleclub.co.uk/Reports.html#repsun041011 :-)
by John Catt
27 Aug 2012, 8:01pm
Forum: Cycling UK Member Groups and Affiliates
Topic: Weekend Campers in Leicester
Replies: 2
Views: 95739

Re: Weekend Campers in Leicester

Hi Wayne,

There isn't a specific camping group in Leicestershire that I'm aware of, although we certainly have members that cycle camp. Not sure if you have signed up to the Leicestershire & Rutland members forum at http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/CTC_Leics_and_Rutland/. This might help you locate members interested in such a group.

If you don't mind going a bit south, Kettering CTC has occasional camping weekends and the "Golden Beeches" weekend is coming up - 12th to 14th October. You can find more details on their website at http://www.ctckettering.org.uk and Max Scott would no doubt be happy to chat to you on the phone about this.

There is also the East Midlands Rally that involves camping at Beaumanor near Loughborough. You can see some photos at http://4c3.de/oLi. It should be taking place again next year in May.

Regards,

John
http://www.ctclr.org.uk
by John Catt
22 Jun 2012, 6:17pm
Forum: Cycling UK Topics and Discussions
Topic: Life Membership
Replies: 7
Views: 107046

Re: Life Membership

The current complaints procedure can be found at http://beta.ctc.org.uk/about/policies-a ... -procedure.

To quote:

Help us
First and foremost please make sure that the relevant part of CTC knows if you have any issues at all with our service so they can be recorded and dealt with at source.

If you do not get a response or you are not happy with the answer you contact the Chief Executive or Councillor directly.

gordon.seabright@ctc.org.uk


Please use it.
by John Catt
16 May 2012, 8:10pm
Forum: Cycling UK Topics and Discussions
Topic: The CTC - is it vulnerable?
Replies: 256
Views: 220354

Re: The CTC - is it vulnerable?

Noticed the discussion about BC. Think their annual report for the year ending 31 March 2011 may be of interest. It can be seen here: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B2bA7Hjs4Zl-MW9CR3dZTEtQcFE

Think this quote gives some perspective:

The Group has most of its grant revenue set for a four year period, and the Group should make surpluses initially, then deficits later in the four year cycle to balance the budget over 4 years. The Group is in line with hitting its obligations and targets.

The Federation has secured £1m of Sports England funding for a new national series of bike rides, led by women for women, name Breeze.

The Group's principal risks are those of overhead control, and maintenance of public funding and self generating revenues. The Group is aware of its obligation to give value for money, and while its lottery revenues are currently secure, its exchequer funding post April 2012 and the post Olympic settlement remains a risk.


Of course their ordinary membership has no involvement in how they are run, as their Directors are elected by representatives of the clubs - it remains the British Cycling Federation.
by John Catt
31 Mar 2012, 10:31pm
Forum: Cycling UK Topics and Discussions
Topic: The CTC - is it vulnerable?
Replies: 256
Views: 220354

Re: The CTC - is it vulnerable?

The BCF annual report is available at Companies House for £1.

It may add perspective when looking at British Cycling's activity.

The directors present their report and the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2011

PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES AND BUSINESS REVIEW

The Group made a surplus of £798,282 (2010 £454,589) This was an line with the four year budget of the Group. In accordance with required accounting treatment, the company has consolidated its accounts with British Cycling Events Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary which organises events on behalf of The British Cycling Federation.

The Group has most of its grant revenues set for a four year period, and the Group should make surpluses initially, then deficits later in the four year cycle to balance the budget over 4 years. The Group is in lane with hitting its obligations and targets.

The Federation has secured £1m of Sport England funding for a new national series of bike rides, led by women for women, named Breeze.

The Group's principal risks are those of overhead control, and maintenance of public funding and self generating revenues The Group is aware of its obligation to give value for money, and while its lottery revenues are currently secure, its exchequer funding post April 2012 and the post Olympic settlement remains a risk.

British Cycling is the National Governing Body for cycling in Great Britain, whose aim is to inspire participation in cycling as a sport, recreation and sustainable transport through achieving worldwide success. British Cycling manages all elite aspects of the sport including events and performances at GB level and governs the development of cycle sport in England. It also represents Great Britain at UCI, the World Governing Body for Cycling, which oversees the sport at an international level.

British Cycling also provides essential services to the Home Country Governing Bodies in Scotland and Wales, the Scottish Cyclists' Union (SCU) and the Welsh Cycling Union (WCU), who are involved ln the promotion and development of cycling at all levels including the focus on the Commonwealth Games. British Cycling provides essential services to these governing bodies including the administration of membership, licences and insurance as well as providing strategic guidance and support on all aspects of cycling.

British Cycling is entering an unprecedented period of expansion in the run up to London 2012 through increased funding from UK Sport, Sport England and commercial partnerships, and will drive a real and tangible legacy for cycling beyond 2012. The legacy has to be one of an increased volunteer workforce and a large British Cycling membership base. All of the Sport England outcomes of Bntish Cycling‘s Whole Sport Plan 2009-2013 in the first and second year have been achieved.

The Group has targeted increasing its membership to 100,000 over the four year period, at the year end, this figure was 35,233 and the Group is satisfied with this performance.


Hope you will forgive any typos. They filed it as an image.

The main accounts show an income for the year of £20,226,151.

It should be noted that even 40,000 members at £24 per time would produce less that £1M in income.
by John Catt
4 Aug 2011, 9:04am
Forum: Cycling UK Member Groups and Affiliates
Topic: poor service from CTC Membershio 'Fullfillment' section
Replies: 50
Views: 108084

Re: poor service from CTC Membershio 'Fullfillment' section

Hi Simon,

Simon L6 » Wed Aug 03, 2011 5:24 pm

John Catt wrote:One of the characteristics IMHO of the English is that we prefer to grumble rather than complain.

John


I'm of the complaining school. Much good it did anybody.


Good to learn that you are a complainer Simon. It would appear then that the complaints procedure has failed.

Complaints - Minimum procedure
1. Upon receipt of a formal complaint it will be referred to the Director or his delegated officer and be acknowledged in writing and referred to an officer who will be identified in the acknowledgement.
2. All complaints are dealt with at the level in the CTC nearest to the source of the complaint and the “responsible officer” will be identified on this basis. If the complaint involves a local group the officer will usually be the secretary.
3. The responsible officer will set a timetable for their enquiries and communicate this to the complainant.
4. The responsible officer will open a file on the complaint, decide an appropriate method to deal with the complaint (which may include seeking the advice of senior officers on procedure in complex cases)
5. On completion of their enquiries, the responsible officer will communicate the decision to the complainant and place a record of the decision on file.
6. The responsible officer will decide the appropriate method of communication but ensure that the complainant is aware of their right of appeal and the path into the appeal process.
7. Where a complaint is upheld and leads to an issue of discipline, the consequences will be dealt with under the disciplinary procedure.


Please can you let me have details of your most recent complaint and I'll try and ascertain what went wrong. If you don't want to post here you can email me at john.catt@ctc.org.uk.

Regards,

John
by John Catt
3 Aug 2011, 11:17am
Forum: Cycling UK Member Groups and Affiliates
Topic: poor service from CTC Membershio 'Fullfillment' section
Replies: 50
Views: 108084

Re: poor service from CTC Membershio 'Fullfillment' section

One of the characteristics IMHO of the English is that we prefer to grumble rather than complain.

I find members grumbling about things that went wrong years ago and, when I ask, I find that they had not complained. While any organisation needs to attempt to find out what it can do better, it is helpful if customers/members do complain.

Wonder if we need to make the procedure more apparent? I put "Complaints" in the search box on the website which took me to http://www.ctc.org.uk/DesktopDefault.aspx?TabID=3655 . The "How to Contact CTC" section in 'Cycle' has a section headed "COMPLAINTS" which says "For a copy of the CTC's complaints procedure, please write to The Chief Executive, CTC, Parklands, Railton Road, Guildford GU2 9JX".

Regards,

John
by John Catt
14 Feb 2011, 8:51pm
Forum: Cycling UK Member Groups and Affiliates
Topic: Sportive / Reliability / Audax type rides
Replies: 12
Views: 9408

Re: Sportive / Reliability / Audax type rides

Would this meet the bill?

http://www.ctc.org.uk/resources/events/ ... t_2011.pdf

You reach it via:
Activities & Events
On Road Events List
Complete List of Events.

Hopefully it will be easier to find once the new website is up and running.
by John Catt
28 Jan 2011, 10:05pm
Forum: CTC Charity Debate
Topic: Campaigning as a charity
Replies: 31
Views: 39007

Re: Campaigning as a charity

JohnW wrote:Well, it's all over now, bar the .......er....er.....the Charity Commissioners asking questions.


No it is not. The ballot changed nothing. The vote at the AGM was in favour of unifying the CTC as a charity. The ballot merely confirmed that motion with an increased majority in favour.

To make any change the M&AA have to be amended and this will require 75% of those voting to be in favour. Bearing in mind that the vote in favour in the ballot only just passed the 75% figure, I don't think anything can be taken for granted.
by John Catt
20 Jan 2011, 12:40am
Forum: CTC Charity Debate
Topic: New Membership Cycling Organisation
Replies: 101
Views: 200649

Re: New Membership Cycling Organisation

Philip Benstead wrote:It looks like CTC members/Councillors do not know their own club
the text below come from CTC MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION of the CYCLISTS’ TOURING CLUB
Date May 2000

That hadn't escaped me :) . Part of the irony being that the objects of the M&AA are fully in line with the CTC being a charity. The amendments proposed at the AGM were minimal. So what are we arguing about? The issue seems to be with the way the club is currently being managed (and this would apply whether or not we become a charity).

Changing the management of the Club means that you need to find different Councillors to stand and replace people like me. Not oppose charitable status that makes no difference.

The objects you list above cover the activities of the CTC now and as they did in 1891. See my post "Result In" page 3 at 5.49pm.
viewtopic.php?f=38&t=46053&start=30

The CTC can still be a charity even if it undertakes no government contracts and works in the way it did in 1950. I for one do not want to go back to 1950, but if members really want that, they need to elect an appropriate Council, not oppose uniting as a single charity.

Regards,

John
by John Catt
19 Jan 2011, 5:49pm
Forum: CTC Charity Debate
Topic: Result in
Replies: 50
Views: 178882

Re: Result in

thirdcrank wrote:Presumably it's just a legal way of saying that you can't have a poll on a subject every five minutes, while leaving open the possiblity of change in due course.


Bang on. In fact intriguingly I came across the blow by blow notes of the Special General Meeting held on the 13th November 1891when the rule about polling was introduced in an old Gazette I have photographed and put on the web at:
http://picasaweb.google.com/LandRCTC/CT ... directlink

At the time there was a tendency to hold a meeting at one end of the country and make a decision, only to have it reversed at another meeting at the other end of the country. I think this was the main reason the rules was introduced. It is apparent that "robust debate" was as strong tradition of the Club even at that time if you read the proceedings (you will need to use the magnifying glass option). The report starts on page 350 but the last 2 pages (359 & 360) cover the polling issue and I think make interesting reading. I think I could almost interchange some of the members from our Loughborough AGM with those attending that meeting 120 years ago :) .

As to majority decisions, at the last General Election there was a turnout of 65% and the combined Conservative/Liberal vote was 59% of that vote. So our government was elected by 39% of the electorate.

Local elections are lucky to get a turnout of 30%. A 25% participation level is very good for a voluntary organisation. The General Secretary of Unite was elected on a 16% turnout - see http://www.theprisma.co.uk/2010/11/22/u ... ts-are-in/

Indeed until about 3 years ago such decisions would have been taken at an AGM where you would be lucky to get 300 people turning up and there was no provision for proxy voting. Getting to the AGM involves considerable expense so that such meetings tended to be unrepresentative of the membership as a whole. We now involve a much higher proportion of the membership in our decisions.

Regards,

John
by John Catt
19 Jan 2011, 4:43pm
Forum: CTC Charity Debate
Topic: New Membership Cycling Organisation
Replies: 101
Views: 200649

Re: New Membership Cycling Organisation

Hi Phil,

Ironically it would appear that your organisation as specified below could qualify as a charity under several headings.

The advancement of amateur sport http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/Ch ... sport.aspx
The advancement of health or saving of lives http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/Ch ... ealth.aspx
The advancement of citizenship or community development http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/Ch ... pment.aspx
The advancement of education http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/Ch ... ation.aspx

DRAFT AIMS FOR THE CYCLING ASSOCIATION

1. The name of the Club is the “CYCLING ASSOCIATION”.
2. The Registered office of the Club will be situated in England.
3. The objects for which the Club is established are:
(1) To promote, assist and protect the use of bicycles, tricycles and other similar vehicles on the public roads and public rights of way;
(2) To promote and safeguard the interests of riders of bicycles, tricycles and other similar vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “cyclists”);
(3) To encourage cycling and cycle touring as a means of adventure, recreation, character training and other forms of education, to stimulate by all possible means interest and participation, and in particular the interest and participation of young persons, in cycling, and to promote cycling competitions, rallies, rides and other events;
(4) To promote and increase appreciation of the countryside and places of public interest, to establish and protect access thereto by cycle and on foot, to preserve and improve amenities, to take appropriate action thereto in Parliament and in and before Government departments, local and other public authorities, bodies and officers, landowners, developers and others, and to establish and support, or aid in the establishment and support of, or join with or help any association, establishment or institution formed wholly or partially for such purposes as aforesaid or any of them;
(5) To educate in road usage, increase road safety and in particular the safety of cyclists, and to promote and assist in the promotion of any plans, measures, schemes or proposals designed to that end;
(6) To provide legal assistance for the riders of bicycles, tricycles and other similar vehicles in the enforcement of their rights to use the public roads and public rights of way;
(7) To cater for the needs of cyclists by collecting and furnishing information for the planning and conduct of cycling tours, publishing and supplying books, routes, guides, brochures, accommodation lists, maps, periodicals and newspapers, badges and emblems, by arranging for insurance and any necessary documentation, and to organise and conduct cycle tours both at home and overseas and make all appropriate arrangements for participants therein, and to promote and safeguard the interests of cyclists in all such ways as the conditions of the times may render desirable.


Regards,

John
by John Catt
19 Jan 2011, 4:21pm
Forum: CTC Charity Debate
Topic: Stabbing CTC in the back!
Replies: 21
Views: 160898

Re: Stabbing CTC in the back!

Can I make one thing clear - the poll was simply a vote confirming the motion at passed at the AGM which was that
"This AGM agrees that the Cyclists' Touring Club should be registered as a charity and merge with CTC Charitable Trust to form a single unified membership organisation with charitable status".


IT CHANGES NOTHING.

The CTC cannot progress to charitable status without changing its M&AA. This will need another vote with 75%+ of those voting being in favour.

The poll only just exceeded the 75% figure and if you read the grounds for the protest below you can see that the grounds were very critical of the chairman who acted perfectly correctly in voting with the stated position of his Board (Counci). I speculate that some of the votes in favour may have been to show support for the Chairman.

The grounds given by the petitioner were:
We protest the motion on the following grounds:

1. there was insufficient consultation with the membership on the proposals outlined in the motion;

2. that the membership were provided with incomplete and misleading information as to the potential effects of the proposals;

3. that those opposed to the proposed changes were not given equal access to the resources of CTC, such as the member magazine, e-mail newsletter and membership lists, to put forward their arguments to the membership;

4. that motion 8 had been lost on the votes cast at the meeting and the directed proxy votes, and was passed only by the use of the Chairman's discretionary proxy votes which were cast against the prevailing wishes of the membership;

5. that the Chairman acted inappropriately in casting his discretionary proxy votes after the results of all other votes had been revealed, rather than at the time other discretionary proxy votes were cast were cast by those holding them.


Regards,

John Catt