regoak wrote:It is also a bit demaeaning for charities that operate for welfare and health purposes, having an organisation primarily operating for leisure purposes having themselves parade as an equal.
OK the accountants have succeeded in getting the CTC a tax break etc, but dont flaunt it in such a banal way.
I'd point out that many of these "welfare and health" charities see cycling (which is what CTC promotes as a charity) as complementary in helping reduce the need of their services.
Lack of exercise results in:
Poor transfer of oxygen through blood to the cells.
Increased risk of cancer. Active people face less risk.
Diabetes. Insulin sensitivity is increased due to lack of exercise.
Obesity, which leads to several health problems.
Heart diseases.
Strokes. Regular exercise lowers blood pressure, reduces the risk of blood clots and raises HDL cholesterol.
The chances of cognitive decline or dementia. These are seen less in active people.
Loss of muscle mass.
Osteoporosis.
Take a look at what that notable health charity the British Heart Foundation has to say about cycling - http://www.bhf.org.uk/heart_matters_online/april_may_2011/activity/cycling.aspx
I would suggest that the CTC, if it succeeds in increasing cycling levels to those seen in many countries on the Continent, will deliver a larger health benefit than most individual health charities.