I don't see why the change to charitable status meant an inevitable and execrable rebrand. You couldn't imagine the RAC or AA ditching its heritage and brand awareness in favour of something instantly forgettable and cringe inducing.
As it stands it competes with British Cycling and risks losing its credibility built on decades of campaigning and activity.
Search found 7 matches
- 3 Jun 2016, 9:57am
- Forum: The Cycling UK brand refresh
- Topic: The Rebrand is Essential to our Future
- Replies: 142
- Views: 101448
- 3 Jun 2016, 9:12am
- Forum: Cycling UK Topics and Discussions
- Topic: What is CUK now?
- Replies: 77
- Views: 9926
Re: What is CUK now?
As someone who isn't a regular on the forum I was surprised to see CTC replaced by CUK. Surprised and massively dismayed. Why would you ditch a strong brand with a slightly random, forgettable and not quite complete sentence? The pitch of the new website seems to be aimed at a metropolitan and new-to-cycling audience not the existing membership - it looks and feels very similar to something you'd expect a local authority to do. Is this the intended strategy?
Who advised the board - some minor league marketing company?
I can't imaging the league of American bicyclists making the same mistake so why has the CTC taken this regrettable decision?
Who advised the board - some minor league marketing company?
I can't imaging the league of American bicyclists making the same mistake so why has the CTC taken this regrettable decision?
- 11 Sep 2013, 4:14pm
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Best cycling adventure book, any ideas?
- Replies: 82
- Views: 22753
Re: Best cycling adventure book, any ideas?
I agree with the recommendation re 'Travel with Rosinante' which I dip back into now and again. I also like 'Breaking loose' by Dave Cook about his trip to Australia - an unconventional chap who unfortunately died following a traffic accident in Turkey.
I recall coming across an extract from a book written by a woman in the early 1900s about a lone cycle tour in the North of England/Scotland, called something like: "diary of a golf widow"...but never been able to track it down. Anybody have a clue?
I recall coming across an extract from a book written by a woman in the early 1900s about a lone cycle tour in the North of England/Scotland, called something like: "diary of a golf widow"...but never been able to track it down. Anybody have a clue?
- 11 Sep 2013, 10:59am
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Framsets with 72 deg seat tube angles
- Replies: 34
- Views: 5785
Re: Framsets with 72 deg seat tube angles
It's unclear what size the OP is looking for but as a smaller rider this has been a headache every time I come to add to the stable. The other option not mentioned yet is Surly - their LHT may be overkill but fits the seat tube requirement. I also know folk using the crosscheck for light to medium touring who really like it. Plus some bargains out there on the framesets. http://www.winstanleysbikes.co.uk/category/337/Frames
- 11 Sep 2013, 8:01am
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Framsets with 72 deg seat tube angles
- Replies: 34
- Views: 5785
Re: Framsets with 72 deg seat tube angles
If it's light touring why not the audax?
Alternatively, planet x are good:
http://www.planet-x-bikes.co.uk/i/q/FRP ... e_and_fork
Mercian will probably be more expensive than spa ti.
Alternatively, planet x are good:
http://www.planet-x-bikes.co.uk/i/q/FRP ... e_and_fork
Mercian will probably be more expensive than spa ti.
- 10 Sep 2013, 5:42pm
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Hadrian's wall route 72
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2108
Re: Hadrian's wall route 72
I think Port Carlisle is on the route and there's a couple of sites around there:
http://www.ukcampsite.co.uk/sites/townl ... ty=Cumbria
http://www.ukcampsite.co.uk/sites/townl ... ty=Cumbria
- 29 May 2009, 10:21am
- Forum: Campaigning & Public Policy
- Topic: Cycle to Work Scheme
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3823
Re: Cycle to Work Scheme
and another is DWP - so with HMRC that's around 160,000 civil servants denied access. Laughingly the DWP cited "tax concerns" as its reason. Given it's the government's own scheme a case of left hand, right hand?