Sweep wrote:I did once consider these couplings years ago but then got diverted by other cycling interests.
Honest questions though.
With such a frame isn't someone still going to use a hard case of some sort?
With all the storage issues of that?
Is the broken down frame less handy for transporting in a soft or padded bag of some sort?
Is the broken down frame less identifiable as a bike to the sometimes careless (or worse) baggage handlers?
Apologies if these are daft questions, still early and the espresso hasn't kicked in yet.
I explained it in another thread here once before, but I'll explain it again:
1. Yes, you use a hard case - it's 26"x26"x10", max size allowed on airlines without paying oversize fees
2. Storage: yes, but all my trips so far I've had someplace to store it, so no issues.
3. They make soft cases for the broken down frame, but I haven't used one before, since it's all been transported by plane and a soft case wouldn't protect it
4. The case it's in MIGHT be identifiable as a bike, but I don't know
Also, the way I travel I usually use public transport to get from place to place, or walk; getting a full bike AND lots of luggage from place to place in that way is very difficult if not impossible. If the bike is broken down, and in a case with wheels, then carrying that around along with other luggage is quite a bit more convenient. I don't typically hire cars to transport myself, bike and luggage, so the fact that it's in a regular case makes it much easier for me to move around with it. It pays for the inconvenience of having to take it apart and put it back together.
In my next trip, I'm going to assemble the bike, then ship the empty case to my end-point so I can disassemble it again and carry it with me on the way back to the starting point by train. Most European high-speed trains don't allow full-sized bikes on them, so this is a necessity.
- Tim