gxaustin wrote:If they are worried by ambulances being required at accidents on the roads then maybe they should ban cars!
They should. But the Mayor of London has now suspended all charges - ULEZ and Congestion Charge - for everyone
gxaustin wrote:If they are worried by ambulances being required at accidents on the roads then maybe they should ban cars!
Marcus Aurelius wrote:It’s coming. Probably within a week. The Government have deliberately left cycling out of their list of ‘approved physical activities’ because of the risk of getting flattened by cretins in vehicles, and detracting from the stretched NHS.
Q: Can I ride with my friend if we don’t live in the same household?
A: No, you should not ride with a friend if you don’t live in the same household as either of you may be infected, although may not be showing symptoms. It would be wise (although frustrating) to stay at home and use a turbo trainer or exercise bike if you have one, instead of going out, even if you feel well.
Q: Is it OK to go for a ride with my kids?
KH: Yes, if you are all well and not self-isolating because of symptoms of a cough or fever then you are not a risk to others.
It's therefore safe to go for a ride with the usual hygiene precautions outlined above. https://www.cyclinguk.org/article/coronavirus-qa-it-safe-cycle
Psamathe wrote:So maybe CUK will investigate further and may be able to relax things if so advised.
Two fundamental strategies are possible: (a) mitigation, which focuses on slowing but not necessarily stopping epidemic spread – reducing peak healthcare demand while protecting those most at risk of severe disease from infection, and (b) suppression, which aims to reverse epidemic growth, reducing case numbers to low levels and maintaining that situation indefinitely.
The major challenge of suppression is that this type of intensive intervention package – or something equivalently effective at reducing transmission – will need to be maintained until a vaccine becomes available (potentially 18 months or more) – given that we predict that transmission will quickly rebound if interventions are relaxed.
intermittent social distancing – triggered by trends in disease surveillance – may allow interventions to be relaxed temporarily in relative short time windows, but measures will need to be reintroduced if or when case numbers rebound.
there is no easy policy decision to be made. Suppression, while successful to date in China and South
Korea, carries with it enormous social and economic costs which may themselves have significant
impact on health and well-being in the short and longer-term. Mitigation will never be able to
completely protect those at risk from severe disease or death and the resulting mortality may
therefore still be high.
gxaustin wrote:
Does anyone know if there is an insurance problem for Ride leaders from putting on rides?
gxaustin wrote:This is CUK detailed advice. It doesn't seem to preclude group rides - does it? Or cafe stops?
Graham Austin
mjr wrote:https://www.cyclinguk.org/news/coronavirus-advice-cycling-uk-groups-and-volunteers
CUK advice, updated today. I think KLWNBUG will also follow it, rather than the sports bodies.
[Cycling UK is] Encouraging groups to provide antibacterial gels and wipes during the activity and will be covering expenses for this.
mercalia wrote:LinusR wrote:Incidentally, I went into Blacks - the outdoor and camping shop - yesterday. Shop assistant asks me: "Are you looking for something in particular?" Yes, I say. Do you have any bivvy bags? "What?" came the reply. Yes, you know. To sleep in with your sleeping bag. "Um..., err..." It's sort of like a little tent, says me trying to be helpful to the camping department staff member. "Ah, a tent. We don't have tents in the winter stock. We'll have them in the spring. Come back then."
I don't think I'll ask again...
you were lucky he knew what a tent was.
mattheus wrote:If you take just a little care, mats generally survive most surfaces. (you're sleeping on it, not sledging off PenYFan, right?)
nsew wrote:A large early model Neo Air Venture. Tough but non too warm, 1.8 tog value I believe. 275g Gossamer groundsheet here for £11
https://www.campingworld.co.uk/en/Jack- ... nerID=1591
nsew wrote:Bivvy and tarp is a fantastic way to travel with very few (but manageable) downsides. It’s incredibly easy to camp stealthily in places where you would never consider a tent. I’m 6ft plus and slim. For a five month trip to Barcelona through the Massive Central and Pyrenees and back I used the Hunka XL, a minus 5 bag, Snugpak Basha tarp and a Jack Wolfskin Gossamer groundsheet (150d). The overkill groundsheet is a necessity for this type of travel. The tarp (64” x 98”) would of ideally of been a foot longer and a foot wider. The Hunka XL would not take a large mattress inside but would definitely take a regular mummy shaped mattress. No need to carry poles as cutting and shaping a suitable branch or two was a doddle. 2nd photo was my spot in Barcelona for 3 weeks.
nsew wrote:More pics.