Search found 3047 matches
- 7 Sep 2008, 4:46pm
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: durable spokes
- Replies: 42
- Views: 7821
- 7 Sep 2008, 9:20am
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: tandam brakes
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1000
Most tandems will also have some sort of attachment for the reaction arm of the Arai. If it has a disc mount instead, there is an adaptor available.
This page is excellent:
http://www.precisiontandems.com/arai.htm
This page is excellent:
http://www.precisiontandems.com/arai.htm
- 6 Sep 2008, 10:14pm
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Marathon plus tyres
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1950
Marathon != Marathon Plus.
There are three problems with Marathon Pluses:
1) Very heavy
2) Hard to fit
3) Some riders report the bead breaking and strands of steel puncturing the tube.
Rolling resistance is worse, but probably due more to the thick sidewall. They're a good choice for a Brompton, where rear wheel punctures involve a bit of an odyssey.
There are three problems with Marathon Pluses:
1) Very heavy
2) Hard to fit
3) Some riders report the bead breaking and strands of steel puncturing the tube.
Rolling resistance is worse, but probably due more to the thick sidewall. They're a good choice for a Brompton, where rear wheel punctures involve a bit of an odyssey.
- 6 Sep 2008, 10:11pm
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: durable spokes
- Replies: 42
- Views: 7821
- 6 Sep 2008, 10:10pm
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: Vintage parts
- Replies: 25
- Views: 2612
- 6 Sep 2008, 10:34am
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: tandam brakes
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1000
- 6 Sep 2008, 10:32am
- Forum: Does anyone know … ?
- Topic: how many fill's do you get from those Co2 Pumps,?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 937
CO2 has saved me from a long walk home three or four times. One 16g canister will get a narrow 700c tyre very hard and a 2" MTB tyre hard enough to ride.
You can work it out by estimating the volume of the tyre (pi times the square of the radius times the mid-circumference of the tube - do it all in metres). 16g of CO2 is roughly 8.75 litres at normal temperature, so divide that by your tyre volume and you get the number of atmospheres' pressure.
E.g.:
23mm 700c tyre is about 1 litre, so you get 8.75 atm or 130psi.
2" MTB tyre is about 3.7 litres, so you get a less impressive 2.4 atm or 35psi.
You can work it out by estimating the volume of the tyre (pi times the square of the radius times the mid-circumference of the tube - do it all in metres). 16g of CO2 is roughly 8.75 litres at normal temperature, so divide that by your tyre volume and you get the number of atmospheres' pressure.
E.g.:
23mm 700c tyre is about 1 litre, so you get 8.75 atm or 130psi.
2" MTB tyre is about 3.7 litres, so you get a less impressive 2.4 atm or 35psi.
- 5 Sep 2008, 6:20pm
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: Are thinner wheels inherently weaker ?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1245
- 5 Sep 2008, 6:16pm
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: durable spokes
- Replies: 42
- Views: 7821
- 5 Sep 2008, 9:31am
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: Wheelbuilding (again)
- Replies: 50
- Views: 7493
I always use d/b on both sides, and have never broken (or even loosened) a spoke, except in a major prang.
Plain gauge spokes have no advantages except cheapness. There are, however, single-butted spokes which may have an advantage on the drive side, because they have a thicker elbow (the same as the major diameter of the thread, which is about 2.3 mm and only just fits through the hub spoke hole), which is where you need the extra metal.
Plain gauge spokes have no advantages except cheapness. There are, however, single-butted spokes which may have an advantage on the drive side, because they have a thicker elbow (the same as the major diameter of the thread, which is about 2.3 mm and only just fits through the hub spoke hole), which is where you need the extra metal.
- 5 Sep 2008, 9:28am
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: durable spokes
- Replies: 42
- Views: 7821
I'd have DT Competition 2.0/1.8/2.0 out of preference, and Sapim if not available. ACI aren't supposed to be as good because the elbow doesn't hug the hub flange properly (unless you put a brass washer under the head, which is a faff and just adds weight).
Avoid "rustless" and chrome-plated spokes. Also beware of black spokes - the DT ones are dyed stainless steel and are fine, but those on cheaper bikes are painted steel and will rust eventually.
Avoid "rustless" and chrome-plated spokes. Also beware of black spokes - the DT ones are dyed stainless steel and are fine, but those on cheaper bikes are painted steel and will rust eventually.
- 5 Sep 2008, 9:20am
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: Are thinner wheels inherently weaker ?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1245
The bracing angle is important, and this depends on the flange spacing and the amount of dish (for a rear derailleur or disc brake wheel). If the spokes come into the rim with a low bracing angle - nearly vertical - the wheel is less able to withstand side loads. That pothole wasn't a side load though!
Generally I'm with Jobst Brandt - build a wheel with the spokes as tight as possible, but ensure it is below the pringle limit. If you take it too far, the wheel will assume a soft pringle shape - don't worry, it's elastic deformation - when you do a final stress relief job by squeezing the spokes hard, and you'll need to back them all off. Something like a Mavic MA3 will cope with very little tension compared to, say, a DT rim, where the limiting factor is simply that the spoke nipples become too stiff to turn.
Shock loads like a pothole can only reduce spoke tension, not increase it. Maybe that Chrina rim wasn't built as tight as it could be, or it was built as tight as possible for the rim design, but that still wasn't enough. If the spokes in the area of the impact ever go into compression, you're in trouble.
I hit a pothole this year which was big enough to give me a snakebite puncture in a 145psi (yes, really - Fortezzas are good for 165psi) rear tyre. The wheel was fine, though.
Generally I'm with Jobst Brandt - build a wheel with the spokes as tight as possible, but ensure it is below the pringle limit. If you take it too far, the wheel will assume a soft pringle shape - don't worry, it's elastic deformation - when you do a final stress relief job by squeezing the spokes hard, and you'll need to back them all off. Something like a Mavic MA3 will cope with very little tension compared to, say, a DT rim, where the limiting factor is simply that the spoke nipples become too stiff to turn.
Shock loads like a pothole can only reduce spoke tension, not increase it. Maybe that Chrina rim wasn't built as tight as it could be, or it was built as tight as possible for the rim design, but that still wasn't enough. If the spokes in the area of the impact ever go into compression, you're in trouble.
I hit a pothole this year which was big enough to give me a snakebite puncture in a 145psi (yes, really - Fortezzas are good for 165psi) rear tyre. The wheel was fine, though.
- 5 Sep 2008, 8:56am
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: Dynohubs
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5159
- 5 Sep 2008, 8:53am
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: fixed wheel and hub gears.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 874
www.oldbiketrader.co.uk has just got an original ASC in, yours for £180. Apparently it feels nothing like a "real" fixie, because there is a fair bit of slop.
- 5 Sep 2008, 8:51am
- Forum: Bikes & Bits – Technical section
- Topic: Refurbishing Harry Hall
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2066