This driver sentenced to 15 months for running a red light and trying to get away with it.
http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/138106 ... ef=mr&lp=3
Let's imagine he'd run that red light, killed a cyclist/pedestrian and stopped at the scene. He would have been done for death by careless driving probably. It's possible that the sentence he would have received in that case would have been less.
Search found 401 matches
- 8 Oct 2015, 12:03pm
- Forum: Campaigning & Public Policy
- Topic: A place to record lenient sentencing for motorvehicle....
- Replies: 664
- Views: 359410
- 24 Aug 2015, 11:31pm
- Forum: Campaigning & Public Policy
- Topic: Amsterdam / infrastructure
- Replies: 180
- Views: 18459
Re: Amsterdam / infrastructure
Isn't retreating to segregated paths where you have to give way every 500m and relinquishing all use of the roads for cyclists admitting defeat and handing victory to the motorist? Surely in the 21st century we can amend the attitude that the gas-guzzling motorist is king of our roads and we must bow down and worship him?
I'm not saying we shouldn't have better facilities where there is a real need but we really need to undo the mentality of the majority of the population that driving a couple of miles through our cities to get from A to B is no longer welcome or sustainable.
I'm not saying we shouldn't have better facilities where there is a real need but we really need to undo the mentality of the majority of the population that driving a couple of miles through our cities to get from A to B is no longer welcome or sustainable.
- 24 Aug 2015, 9:12pm
- Forum: Campaigning & Public Policy
- Topic: Amsterdam / infrastructure
- Replies: 180
- Views: 18459
Re: Amsterdam / infrastructure
aspiringcyclist wrote:jochta wrote:
I think it's a lot down to the liability laws, motorists actually give way to cyclists in situations that they definitely wouldn't do in the UK. I was very surprised how many narrow painted lanes there were in the door zone alongside parked cars, these are crap and dangerous in the UK and I don't see them being any better in the Netherlands.
BTW1) the cycle path or cycle lane maintains priority across side roads and private entrances - unlike the UK
Is not always true. There were several occasions we encountered where the cycle path did NOT have priority over the side junction.
Doubt it's the liability laws which have only existed since the 90s.
Realistically cycle paths can only have priority when it poses no danger. If you have bad sightliness and a reasonably fast road, then it clearly is not safe for cyclists to have priority.
http://www.aviewfromthecyclepath.com/20 ... lists.html
And that's pretty annoying if you want to get anywhere at a reasonable speed when you aren't allowed to cycle on the adjacent road. One of the arguments commonly used by UK cyclists as to why they don't use cycle paths, having to give way at side roads.
In the Netherlands it is not expected that cyclists should be mixed with motorized traffic on roundabouts. There is always a cycle-path or lane of some form.
That's not strictly true. I have video of us negotiating a roundabout which had a painted red lane around the outside of the road on the roundabout. Pretty much mixing with motorised traffic here. Note the door zone cycle path afterwards...
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18968701/forum%20images/VIRB0646.MP4
Note unseen on the video is a motorist giving way to us on our left on the roundabout until we passed their exit.
- 24 Aug 2015, 7:01pm
- Forum: Campaigning & Public Policy
- Topic: Amsterdam / infrastructure
- Replies: 180
- Views: 18459
Re: Amsterdam / infrastructure
TonyR wrote:jochta wrote:On the whole the motorists are very patient and drive extremely safely around cyclists where roads are shared.
If you try to ride on a road that is not shared e.g. one with a cycle track alongside, they are quite capable of giving a punishment pass up with the worst in the UK.
Most roads that have an adjacent segregated cycle path have a cyclists banned sign. Often this one...
- 24 Aug 2015, 5:31pm
- Forum: Campaigning & Public Policy
- Topic: Amsterdam / infrastructure
- Replies: 180
- Views: 18459
Re: Amsterdam / infrastructure
I recently returned from Holland, the first time I've been there and did some cycling. I wrote this on my return. Most of our cycling was in the area near Leiden in the "countryside" or small towns to the west, we did cycle into and around Leiden on one occasion.
I think it's a lot down to the liability laws, motorists actually give way to cyclists in situations that they definitely wouldn't do in the UK. I was very surprised how many narrow painted lanes there were in the door zone alongside parked cars, these are crap and dangerous in the UK and I don't see them being any better in the Netherlands.
BTW
Is not always true. There were several occasions we encountered where the cycle path did NOT have priority over the side junction.
Having now experienced cycling in The Netherlands I can honestly say it's not everything it's cracked up to be. We went fully Dutch and hired heavy sit up and beg bikes, wore normal clothes and no helmets.
The segregated paths away from roads are excellent, really great fun and like your own mini road system. With cycle ferries across rivers, bridges etc. However alongside roads they are less fun, busy and constantly being buzzed by mopeds (which are allowed to use the paths). On most roads cyclists are not allowed to cycle at all and have to use the paths.
Dutch roundabouts are a bit of a pain IMO. Sometimes you have right of way and sometimes you don't and you have to stick right to the outside if the space is shared, I would prefer to take position with the traffic. I actually felt less safe on some of them than I would on a normal roundabout in the UK.
On the whole the motorists are very patient and drive extremely safely around cyclists where roads are shared. We never encountered any bad driving. The strict liability laws probably has a lot to do with that.
The signage is excellent, you just follow a sequence of numbers to follow a route. The NCN in the UK could learn a lot from this system.
I would imagine being a road cyclist (we saw quite a few) in The Netherlands must be quite frustrating. Not allowed to use most roads, having to giveway at junctions a lot and weaving around mopeds and slower cyclists on the narrow paths. Club rides must be very hard to organise.
It was very rare to see a cyclist wearing a helmet (in fact all the ones we did see were UK tourists!), it's a shame the UK got duped by marketing into the "helmet is king" mentality. I would be surprised if there weren't collisions between cyclists, we saw one minor accident where a cyclist had been knocked off by a moped/cyclist. Normal clothing was de rigeur.
Overall some major plus points, especially for commuting and leisure cycling, and some minus points. The biggest challenge for the UK is the "us and them" attitude between motorists and cyclists plus the negative "cycling is dangerous" mindset.
I think it's a lot down to the liability laws, motorists actually give way to cyclists in situations that they definitely wouldn't do in the UK. I was very surprised how many narrow painted lanes there were in the door zone alongside parked cars, these are crap and dangerous in the UK and I don't see them being any better in the Netherlands.
BTW
1) the cycle path or cycle lane maintains priority across side roads and private entrances - unlike the UK
Is not always true. There were several occasions we encountered where the cycle path did NOT have priority over the side junction.
- 29 Jul 2015, 5:01pm
- Forum: On the road
- Topic: Loose stones on the road
- Replies: 20
- Views: 5812
Re: Loose stones on the road
Many lanes in the Chilterns have large drifts of grit and debris over them, e.g. near Ipsden, Stoke Row and Checkendon, some of which form part of NCN5. Debris covers the whole carriageway in places. Clearing of debris is the responsibility of Oxfordshire County Council's Highways Department but they've practically abandoned some of the smaller lanes, e.g. https://goo.gl/maps/KtSeO is a lot worse now than in that view, and aren't interested in going out and sweeping them every so often.
- 29 Jul 2015, 4:26pm
- Forum: Helmets & helmet discussion
- Topic: Lumos Cycle Helmet
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1190
Re: Lumos Cycle Helmet
Where's the evidence for this statement? Drivers don't understand and are inherently unsafe? Utter rubbish.
EDIT :- I notice they back down from this statement in the FAQs, directly contradicting themselves. The visbility of the front facing signal is highly questionable too.
EDIT :- I notice they back down from this statement in the FAQs, directly contradicting themselves. The visbility of the front facing signal is highly questionable too.
Will the lights/turn signals be visible during the day?
It depends. Like with any other bike light or car light for that matter, if it is broad daylight with direct sunlight, then the lights will not be very visible. The darker it is out, the more prominent the lights will be.
For the turn signals, you should always use hand signals and only use Lumos as a supplement to that, even at night. During the day this would be especially true as your hand signals would be readily visible.
- 29 Jul 2015, 4:22pm
- Forum: Helmets & helmet discussion
- Topic: Lumos Cycle Helmet
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1190
Re: Lumos Cycle Helmet
"Automatic Breaking Indicator"
Turn signals on a helmet are pointless. a) it assumes the other road users understand what it means, b) There's no way to distinguish a turn signal at any distance, c) It will go against Highway Code advice...
Arm signals are easily recognised, are what other road users expect to see and have been trained to react to and are unambiguous at a distance. You would be very foolish to stick a right turn light on your head and then just move to the right without an accompanying shoulder check or arm signal. This helmet will encourage that behaviour.
The brake light will not be road legal in the UK if it's the only light used. Not attached to the vehicle and above the maximum height for most cyclists.
Turn signals on a helmet are pointless. a) it assumes the other road users understand what it means, b) There's no way to distinguish a turn signal at any distance, c) It will go against Highway Code advice...
Arm signals
For use when direction indicator signals are not used, or when necessary to reinforce direction
indicator signals and stop lights. Also for use by pedal cyclists and those in charge of horses.
Arm signals are easily recognised, are what other road users expect to see and have been trained to react to and are unambiguous at a distance. You would be very foolish to stick a right turn light on your head and then just move to the right without an accompanying shoulder check or arm signal. This helmet will encourage that behaviour.
The brake light will not be road legal in the UK if it's the only light used. Not attached to the vehicle and above the maximum height for most cyclists.
- 24 Jul 2015, 3:01pm
- Forum: Racing, Olympics, TdF, Competitive cycling
- Topic: ITV4 Tour Coverage.
- Replies: 93
- Views: 11776
Re: ITV4 Tour Coverage.
Every move is a "good move by X" even when X is brought back within 100m.
- 23 Jul 2015, 3:09pm
- Forum: Racing, Olympics, TdF, Competitive cycling
- Topic: ITV4 Tour Coverage.
- Replies: 93
- Views: 11776
Re: ITV4 Tour Coverage.
They talked about Contador's mechanical problem for quite a while yesterday when it was clear he had fallen and been given Sagan's bike. Even when they showed his bloodied forearm they were still blathering on about it being a no fault of his own mechanical incident.
- 15 Jul 2015, 9:43am
- Forum: Racing, Olympics, TdF, Competitive cycling
- Topic: ITV4 Tour Coverage.
- Replies: 93
- Views: 11776
Re: ITV4 Tour Coverage.
"Putting the hammer down" - has re-appeared.
- 9 Jul 2015, 11:34am
- Forum: Racing, Olympics, TdF, Competitive cycling
- Topic: ITV4 Tour Coverage.
- Replies: 93
- Views: 11776
Re: ITV4 Tour Coverage.
You could play TdF ITV4 commentary bingo with Paul Sherwen. He has an obsession with the word "this". Drives me crackers. Count how many times he says one of these...
"on a day like this"
"on a stage like this"
"in a situation like this"
"on this day"
Oh and his other two favourite words...
"attentive"
"nervousness"
I know it must be hard to talk non-stop for several hours but it makes my stomach knot.
"on a day like this"
"on a stage like this"
"in a situation like this"
"on this day"
Oh and his other two favourite words...
"attentive"
"nervousness"
I know it must be hard to talk non-stop for several hours but it makes my stomach knot.
- 6 Jul 2015, 4:01pm
- Forum: Touring & Expedition
- Topic: Cycle Travel Question
- Replies: 1796
- Views: 271479
Re: New Route Planner
Just tried it for some routes from home to Gloucester which I will be riding later in the month and it comes up with some really sensible routes. Liking it. The only oddity I found is I had to route it around the bridleway ford over the Thames at Duxford as that's for the brave on low flows only!!

^^^ that's it on a good day

^^^ that's it on a good day
- 6 Jul 2015, 3:28pm
- Forum: Touring & Expedition
- Topic: Cycle Travel Question
- Replies: 1796
- Views: 271479
Re: New Route Planner
Richard Fairhurst wrote:It tries to be clever about A-roads by rating each one with the actual traffic volume on the road - but there's some margin of error as the OpenStreetMap data doesn't always fit nicely with the traffic counts!
On the issue of that track - it's currently marked in OSM as having a grass surface. Would you say "dirt" is more accurate? If so, I can change it, which will further downrate it in cycle.travel's routing.
I understand there will be some discrepancies and A-roads will vary considerably on time of day! That track is a byway with a dirt/loose surface, OK on mountain bikes and wider tyred tourers in the dry but not suitable for road bikes. A bit difficult to see on Google Streetview but here's one end of it! https://goo.gl/maps/OJMFk
- 6 Jul 2015, 2:12pm
- Forum: Touring & Expedition
- Topic: Cycle Travel Question
- Replies: 1796
- Views: 271479
Re: New Route Planner
Looks like this could be useful planner but it's a bit too keen to avoid A-roads at all costs IMO. I've tried creating some local routes and check out these (short extracts from longer routes) near Didcot. The A4130 is a pretty quiet road and there isn't a lot of option nearby, but the routing really wants to go along the muddy bridleway to avoid a couple of hundred metres of tarmac. If I drag the finish point a bit further it wants to go via Featherbed Lane and the A417 which is a much busier A-road and obviously much further. I couldn't get it to avoid that bridleway on any route that came near the A4130 without adding several extra control points (try routing between Abingdon and Wantage for example.
Other than this example it seems to create decent routes if you're happy to use NCN routes between destinations and I will try it out for real at some point
Other than this example it seems to create decent routes if you're happy to use NCN routes between destinations and I will try it out for real at some point