Oldjohnw wrote:londoncommuter0000 wrote:Oldjohnw wrote:The problem with this thread was, in my view, the original newspaper report. Describing the case as "BMW driver" was unnecessary, unhelpful and prejudicial.
The (excessive, puerile and wholly unnecessary) censorship on this forum makes it impossible for me to tell you what I think BMW drivers are.
Suffice to say that I don't believe that the headline was in error.
So a judge (or jury) asks: " what kind of car did the defendant drive?"
"A BMW".
"OK, case solved. He must be guilty."
Erm…