Bicycler wrote: ...The other thing to consider is that we cannot tell where a new poster on the forum is from or if English is their first language. Clarification may be needed, but nitpicking at what we perceive to be errors in their spelling is likely to get up some noses....
I agree one shouldn't assume anything. But I have noticed that a lot of people who (according to their profile) live in the UK and produce otherwise normal written british english , seeming prefer the 'disk' spelling, even though you would be hard-pushed to find any brake discs for sale in the UK described as 'brake disks'. [To put it into perspective this is a bit like going out any buying an I-pad and then describing it to others as an 'I-padd' or something ...
]
Another example Shimano SI tech doc for BR-M375 Disc Brakes here;
http://www.shimano.com/media/techdocs/content/cycle/SI/DiskBrakeSystem/SI_8JW0A/SI-8JW0A-001-Eng_v1_m56577569830745423.pdf is clearly written in US English (for example 'center' is used instead of 'centre') and the word 'disc' appears where required, and the word 'disk' not at all. Shimano USA's address appears at the bottom the of the document, but it is hosted on the Shimano USA website and whoever that put it there composed a URL for it which contains the word 'disk' instead of 'disc'...
does this reflect that the person concerned has spent too much time dealing with computer disks to realise that there are any other kinds, or didn't notice what was
actually written in the document they filed? Does this apply to people everywhere now? Or is it just the standard US English spelling now? It smacks of being as logical as the 'Lazer' to me....
If you read what I've written in this thread, all I've done is I've asked if other people also find it peculiar that some folk spell it that way, and asking if this is indeed a matter that is right, wrong or otherwise, makes sense etc, whilst making it clear that no-one (least of all me!) has any business being prescriptive about it; after all as I said in my first post, language is defined by usage.
[ BTW History is littered with (largely failed) attempts to prescribe the use of language... one theory is that one of the few instances where it may have in part succeed was in the original Webster's US English dictionary, which I am told proactively promoted many simplified spellings that persist in US English to this day.]
Anyway for my pains I've variously been accused of all kinds of (frankly bizarre) things including
'insulting myself'
'being a Nazi'
etc.
There is a school of thought that once this kind of talk is bandied about in a forum thread, the usefulness of any further discussion may well be somewhat limited.... I'm hoping that this view will be proven wrong...
cheers