Tangled Metal wrote: .. . Wasn't it the time the dangerous dogs act for rushed through?
I do believe so and it has been criticised for having been introduced quickly. That doesn't mean that legislation was not long overdue. I don't have any problem whatsoever with the concept that it's not the dog to blame but the owner - that's pretty much on all fours with my favourite quote of Chief Dan Mathews: "Remember folks, it's not the car that killls it's the driver." That's not to say that it's ok for dogs to roam loose until we have dealt with their often elusive owners.
I think IanA's experience is typical. As I've posted earlier, I think most of the urban strays have been eliminated by traffic. However, in rural areas it's understable that people enjoy the extra security that a dog may provide, both in deterring intruders and making a lot of noise that alerts everybody to the presence of somebody who may be up to no good. Unfortunately, a dog's interpretation of the limits of its own domain may not coincide with the curtilage of its owners property. Farmers are understandably concerned when other people's dogs are not controlled; it should cut both ways.