Which bike is better?

General cycling advice ( NOT technical ! )
Post Reply
Basussa
Posts: 1
Joined: 13 Feb 2018, 10:24pm

Which bike is better?

Post by Basussa »

A Pinnacle Evaporite Two (2012) or a Specialized Allez Elite (2009)?

I am completely new to road bikes and fancy getting a secondhand one. I have found these two bikes for sale in my area for the same price and am wondering if someone could please advise me which of the two bikes would be best?

I am looking for a comfortable ride where I can just get my head down and get some miles in to keep fit and have a good day out.

Thank you.
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16148
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Which bike is better?

Post by 531colin »

Riding a bike without mudguards through just one winter (when they salt the roads) can just about wreck it mechanically unless its maintained adequately. So the bike which will work best may be the one which has been better maintained, regardless of what "groupset" was fitted originally.
You also need to consider if the bike will fit you. Believe it or not, different manufacturers can use different ways of measuring bikes, so 2 bikes the same nominal "size" can in reality be quite different sizes. And the gearing can be different as well....I would always go for the lowest gears that you are likely to find on a "road" bike (the ones they sell to the public tend to "copy" the ones the pros use....even the gearing). However, its hard to tell the gearing from a casual look, unless a bike has a triple chainset, this will almost always mean low gears.
rmurphy195
Posts: 2199
Joined: 20 May 2011, 11:23am
Location: South Birmingham

Re: Which bike is better?

Post by rmurphy195 »

If yu are looking for a comfortable ride, you might want to consider the width of the tyres that can be fitted. I've found an increase from a 28mm tyre to a 32mm "Voyager Hyper",which looks a bit fatter than its nominal size suggests, makes a big difference.

And gears - rule of thumb, I need a bike where at least 2 of the rear sprockets are bigger than the smallest chainwheel!

Mudguards - MUST - and a rack to carry stuff, much better than a rucksack on your back.
Brompton, Condor Heritage, creaky joints and thinning white (formerly grey) hair
""You know you're getting old when it's easier to ride a bike than to get on and off it" - quote from observant jogger !
reohn2
Posts: 45186
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: Which bike is better?

Post by reohn2 »

rmurphy195 wrote:If yu are looking for a comfortable ride, you might want to consider the width of the tyres that can be fitted. I've found an increase from a 28mm tyre to a 32mm "Voyager Hyper",which looks a bit fatter than its nominal size suggests, makes a big difference.

And gears - rule of thumb, I need a bike where at least 2 of the rear sprockets are bigger than the smallest chainwheel!

Mudguards - MUST - and a rack to carry stuff, much better than a rucksack on your back.

And to add that unless you're young and fit and used to folding up your body whilst pedalling for hours on end,don't buy a bike with the tops of the handlebars much below the height of the saddle when it's set at the correct height for you.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
flat tyre
Posts: 565
Joined: 18 Jul 2008, 1:01pm

Re: Which bike is better?

Post by flat tyre »

If you're serious about getting miles in then get 2 bikes, one with mudguards for wet days and one without for fine days. Oh, and don't clutter a nice road bike up with a rack, just make sure you carry any emergency kit in a small saddle bag.
Post Reply