Brooks B17 Standard width?

General cycling advice ( NOT technical ! )
Post Reply
User avatar
deliquium
Posts: 2354
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 3:40pm
Location: Eryri

Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by deliquium »

Brooks' website states their B17 Standard saddles are 175mm wide.

I wonder why all 7 of mine, ranging from 1992 to present day, including normal, titanium and Imperial, measure 170mm at their widest part?
Current pedalable joys

"you would be surprised at the number of people in these parts who nearly are half people and half bicycles"
Jezrant
Posts: 884
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 8:11pm

Re: Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by Jezrant »

You're right. Why do you have 7 of them? And why do the ladies saddles end with an "S"?
reohn2
Posts: 45185
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by reohn2 »

Jezrant wrote:You're right. Why do you have 7 of them? And why do the ladies saddles end with an "S"?

S is for Short as they're shorter than mens
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
Jezrant
Posts: 884
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 8:11pm

Re: Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by Jezrant »

reohn2 wrote:
Jezrant wrote:You're right. Why do you have 7 of them? And why do the ladies saddles end with an "S"?

S is for Short as they're shorter than mens


Thanks R2. Why does Del have 7 Brooks saddles?
amediasatex
Posts: 842
Joined: 2 Nov 2015, 12:51pm
Location: Sunny Devon! just East of the Moor

Re: Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by amediasatex »

I would presume for 7 bikes.

Seems reasonable to me, if you find a saddle that works for you makes sense to have them on all your bikes. It’s what I do too, and always useful to have a spare as well ;-)
Last edited by amediasatex on 17 Aug 2018, 9:06am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
deliquium
Posts: 2354
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 3:40pm
Location: Eryri

Re: Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by deliquium »

Soon to be 8 :shock:

A lightly used brown B17 Imperial should be with me soon, courtesy of gelvis OTP

The thing is, bikes don't look right without saddles and it's good to have a spare + they must have shiny silver chrome rails 8)
Current pedalable joys

"you would be surprised at the number of people in these parts who nearly are half people and half bicycles"
colin54
Posts: 2544
Joined: 24 Sep 2013, 4:34pm

Re: Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by colin54 »

I thought that 'Seven Brooks For Seven Bicycles' would make

a good title for a musical.

One of the songs has already been written...'Bless Your Beautiful Hide'!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7OEKs7hAEk

From Seven Brides For Seven Brothers naturally.
Nu-Fogey
User avatar
gaz
Posts: 14664
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent

Re: Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by gaz »

deliquium wrote:The thing is, bikes don't look right without saddles ...

For the most part they don't ride too well without saddles either :wink: .
Jezrant
Posts: 884
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 8:11pm

Re: Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by Jezrant »

colin54 wrote:I thought that 'Seven Brooks For Seven Bicycles' would make

a good title for a musical.

One of the songs has already been written...'Bless Your Beautiful Hide'!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7OEKs7hAEk

From Seven Brides For Seven Brothers naturally.


I think we've got a hit. 'Seven Brooks for Seven Bikes'. I'm ringing Ed Balls' and Clare Balding's agents right now.
User avatar
Spinners
Posts: 1678
Joined: 6 Dec 2008, 6:58pm
Location: Port Talbot

Re: Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by Spinners »

colin54 wrote:I thought that 'Seven Brooks For Seven Bicycles' would make

a good title for a musical.

One of the songs has already been written...'Bless Your Beautiful Hide'!



Love that. :D
Cycling UK Life Member
PBP Ancien (2007)
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 15215
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by Cyril Haearn »

Hehe

But why are they 170 mm wide not 175 mm?
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
User avatar
deliquium
Posts: 2354
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 3:40pm
Location: Eryri

Re: Brooks B17 Standard width?

Post by deliquium »

Cyril Haearn wrote:Hehe

But why are they 170 mm wide not 175 mm?


I've just emailed Brooks to find out :D
Current pedalable joys

"you would be surprised at the number of people in these parts who nearly are half people and half bicycles"
Post Reply