Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
it is not known whether you did or didn't get wafers with it
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
Audax67 wrote:I've had this one on my office wall for a few years now:
Still trying to work out which handle works the stirrup-pump and which one turns on the gas.
Snap! Brucey mentioned that Howes one in his OP, and pasted an image of it later on page 1. However, I'll never be able to look at my copy of it the same way, after your comment
- kylecycler
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 4:09pm
- Location: Kyle, Ayrshire
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
Sweep wrote:That parabike was of course given a fashion makeover by the italians - can't remember the italian company.
Trussardi. Very swanky.
This is a modern appreciation of the parabike by the British artist Mark Jones:
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
trickiest sky-writing ever
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
Brucey wrote:trickiest sky-writing ever
RubaDub -
Compare the girl, the hat, the jacket, the bike except for the strange artistry around the front brake, even down to the gloves, with the view we've discussed, ostensibly from the Dutch Raleigh catalogue, and aren't they the same - only the pose and location different?
I'd guess (but not with any real knowledge) that the airplane is later than 1922 though.
Last edited by JohnW on 26 Aug 2019, 2:19pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
Brucey wrote:................
cheers
................this is the previous one RubaDub - the one I'm referring to.
I wonder whether the artist was commissioned to paint a number of scenes for Raleigh to archive and use later, and he used the same model from them all?
Maybe your contact has more interesting info for us?
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- kylecycler
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 4:09pm
- Location: Kyle, Ayrshire
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
The Raleigh girl's name is Mabel. Seriously, I've got a copy of the first one, downloaded it somewhere years ago and it's captioned 'Mabel'.
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
have we had this one already? -I'm beginning to lose track....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
kylecycler wrote:The Raleigh girl's name is Mabel. Seriously, I've got a copy of the first one, downloaded it somewhere years ago and it's captioned 'Mabel'.
That's a good post kyle - I tried to find "Raleigh Girl - Mabel" but the search-engine couldn't find anything. One of the (so called associated) sites that came up was a dating site with single girls called Mabel.
And no - I didn't click on it
- kylecycler
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 4:09pm
- Location: Kyle, Ayrshire
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
JohnW wrote:kylecycler wrote:The Raleigh girl's name is Mabel. Seriously, I've got a copy of the first one, downloaded it somewhere years ago and it's captioned 'Mabel'.
That's a good post kyle - I tried to find "Raleigh Girl - Mabel" but the search-engine couldn't find anything. One of the (so called associated) sites that came up was a dating site with single girls called Mabel.
And no - I didn't click on it
I thought they were all (blonde and) called Olga!
Mabel was still a popular girl's name in the UK in the 1920s (and very possibly in Holland, who knows?).
As for the monoplane in the illustration, maybe a Fokker (Fokker being Dutch), or maybe not - it's very distinctive - perhaps aviation enthusiasts might know?
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
more lady in red. Was she the one in the song, too...?
[flippant question BTW...]
no wonky front brake in this version
last seen on a low-flying motorcycle
no relation
[flippant question BTW...]
no wonky front brake in this version
last seen on a low-flying motorcycle
no relation
Last edited by Brucey on 27 Aug 2019, 8:18am, edited 1 time in total.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
'frictionless' is stretching a point
insert your own joke here; (its just too easy, like shooting fish in a barrel)
the photo above is, I think, advertising a Pye Unicam radio; the chopper is there to lend an aura of modernity to the radio...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...
This thread - which is absolutely brilliant - demonstrates (imv) just how nostalgic cyclists are. For all the vast array of modern cycling technology available, there appears to be a remarkable hankering for the past.
Simpler, gentler times? If you had the means, that is, then and now.
Simpler, gentler times? If you had the means, that is, then and now.
John