Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

General cycling advice ( NOT technical ! )
bagpussctc
Posts: 151
Joined: 27 Oct 2009, 6:45pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by bagpussctc »

During my audax days, there was a chap who often had a pipe on the go as he rode along . He was an amazing chap and rider.
Trying to remember his name?
JohnW
Posts: 6667
Joined: 6 Jan 2007, 9:12pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by JohnW »

bagpussctc wrote:During my audax days, there was a chap who often had a pipe on the go as he rode along . He was an amazing chap and rider.
Trying to remember his name?

Yeah - but did his pipe ever dropout? :lol: :lol: :lol:
JakobW
Posts: 427
Joined: 9 Jun 2014, 1:26pm
Location: The glorious West Midlands

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by JakobW »

bagpussctc wrote:Elswick Hopper at a price .
Image1937_Elswick_Hopper_44 by rebalrid, on Flickr

Another British brand consigned to the pages of history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elswick_Hopper


Interesting triangulation there of the tubes on the step-through frame; don't think I've seen that particular type before.

I also note the different location of the mudguard mounts on the two bicycles; the mid-fork mount is something I associate with clubman-style cycles, but is there any advantage over having them at the dropouts?
Brucey
Posts: 44708
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

good spots both.
The frame triangluation as depicted is (IMHO) basically pointless; the conventional place for a lady's frame to break is where the top tube joins the seat tube. I don't think that will be altered in any way by the added stays. As depicted, the frame will probably just be less comfortable to ride.

Having the mudguard stay mounts set two or three inches up the fork both allows the stays to be a little shorter and provides some improvment in the chances of avoiding a mudguard jam; if there is something that starts to jam, it may release itself, because the gap between the mudguard and the tyre will open up slightly as the mudguard moves, initially.

However a frame with a mudguard fitting at the dropout is (very simply) a lot cheaper to make, so that is what we are likely to end with....

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brucey
Posts: 44708
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

another "Happy Couple" advertisement.

Interesting that they have written "B.S.A" rather than "B.S.A." on the poster.

Today I think the ASA might have something to say about 'perfect in every part'

Image

Image

Image
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brucey
Posts: 44708
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

'perfection' varies; check out the shape of those fork ends...

Image

Image

Image

from 1903
Image

from 1951
Image

Image
70' is £3.50. This would have made it a very inexpensive new bike at the time.
Image
Last edited by Brucey on 26 Aug 2019, 9:42am, edited 1 time in total.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
bagpussctc
Posts: 151
Joined: 27 Oct 2009, 6:45pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by bagpussctc »

JohnW wrote:
bagpussctc wrote:During my audax days, there was a chap who often had a pipe on the go as he rode along . He was an amazing chap and rider.
Trying to remember his name?

Yeah - but did his pipe ever dropout? :lol: :lol: :lol:


I am on my bike . :lol:
Brucey
Posts: 44708
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

we've had the 'happy couple' several times over. This is different; a chaperon or, er, the happy threesome...?

Image

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by Brucey on 26 Aug 2019, 10:24am, edited 3 times in total.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oldjohnw
Posts: 7764
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: South Warwickshire

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Oldjohnw »

Brucey wrote:we've had the happy couple several times over. This is different; a chaperon or, er, the happy threesome...?




Looks like the Cotswolds.
John
User avatar
Sweep
Posts: 8449
Joined: 20 Oct 2011, 4:57pm
Location: London

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Sweep »

Mm
That is odd.
Maybe even a bit spooky.
The norm in ads of a certain age is to have two women looking admiringly at a single man who has been wise/refined enough to buy a particular product.
Edit
Agh, just seen the second ad in that post.
That's the norm.
Sweep
Brucey
Posts: 44708
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

Sweep wrote:Mm
That is odd.
Maybe even a bit spooky.
The norm in ads of a certain age is to have two women looking admiringly at a single man who has been wise/refined enough to buy a particular product.
Edit
Agh, just seen the second ad in that post.
That's the norm.


spooky indeed! I just put that in as a contrast!

More;

Image
Image
Image
Last edited by Brucey on 26 Aug 2019, 10:18am, edited 1 time in total.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
Sweep
Posts: 8449
Joined: 20 Oct 2011, 4:57pm
Location: London

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Sweep »

That parabike was of course given a fashion makeover by the italians - can't remember the italian company.
Sweep
Brucey
Posts: 44708
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Brucey »

Sweep wrote:That parabike was of course given a fashion makeover by the italians - can't remember the italian company.


there have been many versions; I'm not even sure the frame layout was first used by BSA, with or without hinges.

In more recent times Pashley have made this frame design, but without hinges. The result is something that is comfy to ride, but it is not a partcularly durable frame design.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
JohnW
Posts: 6667
Joined: 6 Jan 2007, 9:12pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by JohnW »

Sweep wrote:Mm
That is odd.
Maybe even a bit spooky.
The norm in ads of a certain age is to have two women looking admiringly at a single man who has been wise/refined enough to buy a particular product.
Edit
Agh, just seen the second ad in that post.
That's the norm.

Nah - they're laughing at his tie. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Audax67
Posts: 6035
Joined: 25 Aug 2011, 9:02am
Location: Alsace, France
Contact:

Re: Vintage Bicycle Advertisements; good, bad. ugly...

Post by Audax67 »

Brucey wrote:we've had the 'happy couple' several times over. This is different; a chaperon or, er, the happy threesome...?

Image


...or the two at the back saying "wot about her, then?"


---o0o---

I've had this one on my office wall for a few years now:

Image

Still trying to work out which handle works the stirrup-pump and which one turns on the gas.
Have we got time for another cuppa?
Post Reply