Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

General cycling advice ( NOT technical ! )
Brucey
Posts: 44705
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by Brucey »

comment re the 'good, bad, ugly' thread has spurred me to start another thread that invites contributions and links to similar resources on the internet. Anyone who has ever looked at an old bicycle catalogue has probably seen Rebour's wonderful line drawings. There is at least one book of them published now and there are plenty on the internet. So anything goes so long as it is Rebour-related/

Here's a few for starters;

Image

Image

Image
Mid 1960s campagnolo equipment

Image
shimano 600EX (from the mid-80's) somehow looks retro, in Rebour style

Image
first generation shimano XT; originally conceived as a touring groupset, but caught the MTB wave

cheers
Last edited by Brucey on 8 Jul 2020, 6:48pm, edited 1 time in total.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brucey
Posts: 44705
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by Brucey »

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brucey
Posts: 44705
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by Brucey »

Image
stronglight 99

Image
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pga
Posts: 302
Joined: 6 Feb 2007, 9:40pm

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by pga »

Thanks Brucey for taking me back to the wonderful world of Rebour. I have been a fan for years.
Brucey
Posts: 44705
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by Brucey »

Image

when did you last see someone pulling one of these out by the side of the road?

Image
"easy to service" cabling....?
Last edited by Brucey on 8 Jul 2020, 8:07pm, edited 2 times in total.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
thirdcrank
Posts: 36781
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by thirdcrank »

I used to have one that came in a swish plastic pouch but I think it was an early lesson in cognitive dissonance, even before I knew what it meant. Apart from the box spanner which was ideal for dealing with fitting Racer brake levers, I don't remember any of the tools being any use at all. In particular, those large spanner sizes in short, flimsy tools were in chocolate teapot territory. But these were MAFAC tools so they must be just the ticket.
JakobW
Posts: 427
Joined: 9 Jun 2014, 1:26pm
Location: The glorious West Midlands

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by JakobW »

Brucey wrote:Image

when did you last see someone pulling one of these out by the side of the road?

Image
"easy to service" cabling....?


Interesting placement of the bell as well - guessing this might be a case of one being a legal requirement but not wanting to take up space on the bars?
LuckyLuke
Posts: 374
Joined: 10 Jun 2010, 11:54am

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by LuckyLuke »

Interesting mini biography here, and more beautiful illustrations.

https://janheine.wordpress.com/2012/05/ ... =true/amp/

Apparently, on their honeymoon in 1948, him and his missus set a new mixed tandem record in Paris-Brest-Paris! Chapeau to both.

I often refer to "Zinn and the Art of Road Bike Maintenance" when tinkering. It's illustrated throughout by a chap called Todd Telander. I do find illustrations much clearer than photos to work from.

Best wishes,

Luke
Brucey
Posts: 44705
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by Brucey »

JakobW wrote: Interesting placement of the bell as well - guessing this might be a case of one being a legal requirement but not wanting to take up space on the bars?


well yes I suppose so, either that or it is some kind of early warning system in case of imminent underpant failure...?

FWIW there is no way I could ride with a bell there, my thighs would hit it.

Image
brings a whole new dimension to the phrase 'breast pocket'

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
jimlews
Posts: 1483
Joined: 11 Jun 2015, 8:36pm
Location: Not the end of the world.

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by jimlews »

Brucey wrote:Image

when did you last see someone pulling one of these out by the side of the road?



Yesterday afternoon.
But it was me who "pulled one of those out". But the MAFAC tools are in the (later?)plastic pouch.
A cycling chum has the same but, in a MILREMO branded pouch.

Well done Brucey, for reminding us of DR, He was an excellent technical illustrator.
Brucey
Posts: 44705
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by Brucey »

jimlews wrote:...Yesterday afternoon. ....


good work fella! I must say that I always thought they would be of most use on mafac brakes and perhaps for tightening loose stuff; the chances of getting tight things undone with many of the tools seemed fairly remote to me, but maybe that is OK for a take-along tool kit where weight is at a premium.

Image

Q. is the thing on the frame a quick-acting compressed gas inflation gadget? If so I didn't realise they were around in 1950.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bmblbzzz
Posts: 6325
Joined: 18 May 2012, 7:56pm
Location: From here to there.

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by Bmblbzzz »

Brucey wrote:Image
brings a whole new dimension to the phrase 'breast pocket'

cheers

Interesting cable run.
pwa
Posts: 17428
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by pwa »

Thanks Brucey for these images. They are indeed beautiful. And from the point of view of information imparted they pick out detail that a photo might not, so they have a value beyond aesthetics. I wonder why illustration like this has become so rare, because it is widely recognised that people like it. We only have to think of Wainwright's walking guides, the appeal of which is just as much in the hand drawn illustrations as in the walks they describe.
thirdcrank
Posts: 36781
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by thirdcrank »

Brucey wrote: ... Q. is the thing on the frame a quick-acting compressed gas inflation gadget? If so I didn't realise they were around in 1950
...


AFAIK, they were around long before that. Quite a while ago we had a thread where this type of equipment was discussed and I dug out some souvenir editions of the comic with reproductions of old pics. There was one dating back to the early days of the TdeF when riders were not allowed any mechanical assistance. As I type, it's occurred to me that the thread topic was tyresavers. The pic was so fuzzy I could not do a worthwhile scan to illustrate the tyresavers. The riders was festooned with spare tubs and had both a normal pump and a compressed gas thing: not a titchy one but the size of a small fire extinguisher - similar to that pic but bigger.
==========================================================
viewtopic.php?p=126613#p126613

That's the earlier thread about tyresavers.

The rider was Lucien Buysse and I've even quoted the page in the comic where it was printed - pp40-41 June 24 2000 Tour special - I've had a qick look at images online and can't find it. But does it matter?
JakobW
Posts: 427
Joined: 9 Jun 2014, 1:26pm
Location: The glorious West Midlands

Re: Daniel Rebour; a cyclist's eye view

Post by JakobW »

pwa wrote: I wonder why illustration like this has become so rare, because it is widely recognised that people like it. We only have to think of Wainwright's walking guides, the appeal of which is just as much in the hand drawn illustrations as in the walks they describe.


I think the short answer is 'it requires a skilled illustrator and is therefore more expensive (in time and money) than taking a photo'. (And these days digital renders are starting to displace photos in a surprisingly large number of places.)

I've had that Rebour book on a list for years to see if a cheap second-hand copy pops up; I may have to bite the bullet and go for a new one...
Post Reply