... who made this bike, and why?

General cycling advice ( NOT technical ! )
Sid Aluminium
Posts: 255
Joined: 26 Feb 2019, 7:38pm
Location: Beyond the edge of the wild

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by Sid Aluminium »

LollyKat wrote: 15 Jun 2021, 4:21pmPrice included a helmet - so pretty moderate for these days.
The SRAM AXS wireless gearset alone has a street price more than that. The Biden administration, whose unofficial motto seems to be 'good union jobs for all', chiseled the artisan frame shop with the classic 'we can't pay you what you're worth, but think of the exposure you'll get'.

The odd mix of black and brightwork componentry might be the signature look for 2022 as OEMs scramble to build with any parts they can get.
User avatar
kylecycler
Posts: 1384
Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 4:09pm
Location: Kyle, Ayrshire

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by kylecycler »

Sid Aluminium wrote: 18 Jun 2021, 1:55pm
LollyKat wrote: 15 Jun 2021, 4:21pmPrice included a helmet - so pretty moderate for these days.
The SRAM AXS wireless gearset alone has a street price more than that. The Biden administration, whose unofficial motto seems to be 'good union jobs for all', chiseled the artisan frame shop with the classic 'we can't pay you what you're worth, but think of the exposure you'll get'.

The odd mix of black and brightwork componentry might be the signature look for 2022 as OEMs scramble to build with any parts they can get.
Suppose it's the definition of a 'loss leader', not that they had any option other than to turn the job down.

Mind you, I've got the feeling that whoever it was in the Biden administration who 'costed' the deal, at least from their point of view, might not even have had a clue what custom built bikes, or just bikes in general, cost these days (although I think the cost of high end carbon road bikes from the likes of Trek, Specialized, Pinarello, etc. is just obscene now, however you define 'obscene') - my neighbour over the back fence freaks out even when I talk about paying £1000 for a bicycle (not that I ever have! :))...
User avatar
Hellhound
Posts: 756
Joined: 19 May 2021, 7:39am

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by Hellhound »

It looks like an old 80s ATB frame with modern 1x gearing thrown at it.Horrible.
Probably cost a fortune but looks like £100 :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
kylecycler
Posts: 1384
Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 4:09pm
Location: Kyle, Ayrshire

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by kylecycler »

Hellhound wrote: 18 Jun 2021, 4:48pm It looks like an old 80s ATB frame with modern 1x gearing thrown at it.Horrible.
Probably cost a fortune but looks like £100 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Doesn't do it for me either, tbh. Bilenky do excellent, practical, down-to-earth, do-everything bikes, though - the kind of bikes the folk on this forum would be more inclined to identify with - to such an extent that they called this one 'The Brick S***house' (seriously - not swearing, that's what it was called!):
bilenky brick shouse.JPG
bilenky brick shithouse 2.JPG
brick shithouse 3.JPG
thirdcrank
Posts: 36778
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by thirdcrank »

It makes me shudder looking at the angle of the saddle.
User avatar
kylecycler
Posts: 1384
Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 4:09pm
Location: Kyle, Ayrshire

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by kylecycler »

thirdcrank wrote: 18 Jun 2021, 6:59pm It makes me shudder looking at the angle of the saddle.
Same here, absolutely. I really don't get it, but it's not uncommon with Brooks saddles, in fact it seems to be just about the norm to set them up like that, more or less.

I believe the rails don't allow enough setback, which means there tends to be too much weight on the hands - the basic design goes back to the days when seat tube angles were ~ 70 degrees, and they've never been adapted since then - but there surely has to be a better solution.

Mind you, someone on here quite recently suggested that a 'nose up' angle tilts the pelvis back so that the weight is on the sitbones, not the perineum, and I can kinda sorta see the sense in that, but it still doesn't seem right to me.
LollyKat
Posts: 3250
Joined: 28 May 2011, 11:25pm
Location: Scotland

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by LollyKat »

In practice it is fine. IME Brooks saddles become concave in use, so if you don't tilt them up a bit you end up sliding forward all the time.
User avatar
kylecycler
Posts: 1384
Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 4:09pm
Location: Kyle, Ayrshire

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by kylecycler »

LollyKat wrote: 18 Jun 2021, 7:47pm In practice it is fine. IME Brooks saddles become concave in use, so if you don't tilt them up a bit you end up sliding forward all the time.
Well, you've got the experience, LollyKat, I don't (I've never tried a Brooks saddle), so I guess that must be the explanation. Still looks wrong, though.

Mind you, there was a great motorsport race engineer / aerodynamicist called Frank Costin who said something like, "Lord save me from the expression, 'What looks right, is right.'" And vice versa, I suppose.
thirdcrank
Posts: 36778
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by thirdcrank »

I must have led a sheltered existence. If a saddle at that angle was familiar, I'd not have commented.
User avatar
kylecycler
Posts: 1384
Joined: 12 Aug 2013, 4:09pm
Location: Kyle, Ayrshire

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by kylecycler »

thirdcrank wrote: 18 Jun 2021, 8:02pm I must have led a sheltered existence. If a saddle at that angle was familiar, I'd not have commented.
Some things are better not to know - still looks wonky to me. Jan Heine, who you might be familiar with (Bicycle Quarterly, Compass / René Herse Cycles) sets his saddles up like that, though not so extreme, and does mega miles so it must work for him:

Calfee Adventure:
calfee adventure side.jpg
Weigle Randonneur:
weigle_concours_profile.jpg

Still doesn't look right!
LuckyLuke
Posts: 374
Joined: 10 Jun 2010, 11:54am

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by LuckyLuke »

rogerzilla wrote: 15 Jun 2021, 7:54am It's expensive, ungainly, useless for its intended purpose, and probably rather heavy.
Enough about Boris, what about the bike? :lol: :lol:

I actually saw Boris on the first Ride London 100 miler, ?2013. He was London Mayor at the time. He was riding his Boardman hybrid and had a police escort of 3 plain clothes coppers also on bikes. They were like his domestiques, forming a protective ring around their GC man.

For someone associated with cycling, as London Mayor he wasn’t too good at promoting it. Boris Bikes and Cycle Superhighways began under Ken Livingstone, somehow Boris got the credit. Johnson also scrapped the westward extension of the Congestion Charge, (Kensington & Chelsea NIMBYISM no doubt influential), which would have boosted cycling.

Best wishes

Luke
Postboxer
Posts: 1929
Joined: 24 Jul 2013, 5:19pm

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by Postboxer »

He also pulled out from London hosting the Tour de France last minute.
LuckyLuke
Posts: 374
Joined: 10 Jun 2010, 11:54am

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by LuckyLuke »

Postboxer wrote: 24 Jun 2021, 8:37am He also pulled out from London hosting the Tour de France last minute.
He doesn’t do that often, hence the 7 kids… :lol:
User avatar
hujev
Posts: 133
Joined: 19 Jun 2015, 7:45pm
Location: Lake Superior, North America
Contact:

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by hujev »

[quote="Mick F"]
I notice the wheels.
If you have the same spoke-count front and rear, you either have too few at the rear, or too many at the front ...
[/quote]

[color=#8000BF]Or, like me, you're a 40/40 freak who digs symmetry![/color]
[color=#008080][size=85](reluctantly building a 40/36 set because of a 36° dynamo hub)[/size][/color]
User avatar
hujev
Posts: 133
Joined: 19 Jun 2015, 7:45pm
Location: Lake Superior, North America
Contact:

Re: ... who made this bike, and why?

Post by hujev »

A couple other observations:
1) that seat ('saddle') is designed for a hardass... Perhaps putin would have one of Great Soviet Concrete, but comparatively anyway,
2) it's just like the US Government to have the taxpayers buy a bike that'll probably never get used for a rich guy to give to another rich guy, then stiff the artist who built it for most of the actual cost,
3) I like Bilenky even more since he's got an orange Cat,
4) I didn't know he was a former popstar .. nor do I know the notekillers though,
5) I can also see the US Government imagining that Sram stuff is US made since its HQ is here (most Americans have no idea where anything is made nor where it goes when dumped, flushed, or tossed). And too bad they couldn't use True-Temper tubing (though guess at full price and proper pre-order some could have been found). Or they could have gone more 'UK-US' and used Reynolds tubes, a Lion bell, Brooks of course, etc. Maybe under some sort of 'together we are [almost] complete' sloagan.
6) The gearing looks super easy... I wonder if that's based on Boris' preference, or yet more 'duh gee boss, I dunno' US intel...
7) the paint scheme makes it look like not a $4500 bike, nor a $1500 bike, but a $139.99 wal-mart bike!
7.5) Will have to remember which Birmingham builder he studied with...
Post Reply