Helmet Lifetime - Really?

For discussions within the Cycle Training profession.
Claud
Posts: 42
Joined: 19 Nov 2008, 6:54pm

Helmet Lifetime - Really?

Postby Claud » 15 Mar 2011, 9:34pm

I was a bit surprised yesterday that the local Bikeability trainer told my son's class that they needed to check the 'date of manufacture' on their helments, and "should" get new ones if they're more than 3 years old - got me going on a good old rant to my son, that did! Is this really necessary, or have the trainers been duped by helment manufacturers who just want to increase their profits by getting people to dump a piece of kit that's pretty much as good as it was when new? Is there some genuinely independent info on this somewhere?

User avatar
hubgearfreak
Posts: 8210
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 4:14pm

Re: Helmet Lifetime - Really?

Postby hubgearfreak » 15 Mar 2011, 9:37pm

Claud wrote:Is there some genuinely independent info on this somewhere?


yes, i think that there's some quite thorough research about the effectiveness of helmets.
i don't think that old ones are less effective than new though :wink:

stewartpratt
Posts: 2566
Joined: 27 Dec 2007, 5:12pm

Re: Helmet Lifetime - Really?

Postby stewartpratt » 15 Mar 2011, 9:44pm

Polystyrene degrades in an outdoor environment, mainly through UV exposure, does it not? Plus there's also the potential cumulative effect of knocks over time which can also reduce the capacity to absorb energy.

Three years is going to be an "on the safe side" figure, but I think the principle has foundation.

Vorpal
Moderator
Posts: 18487
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 3:34pm
Location: Not there ;)

Re: Helmet Lifetime - Really?

Postby Vorpal » 16 Mar 2011, 8:02am

The plastic outer shell deteriorates more quickly than the polystyrene. UV will make it more brittle with time. If the wearer is not a frequent cyclist and has stored the helmet out of direct sunlight, it is reasonable to assume a longer life than 3 years. Additionally, older helmets (more than 10 years old) have designs that perform better in laboratory tests. Although the plastic may have become more brittle, the protection may still be comparable to a new helmet (if it's been looked after, not dropped or bumped, etc.)

However, children are rougher on helmets, and less likely to ensure that they aren't dropped or bumped. If you believe that your son needs a helmet, it's probably a good idea to replace it at least every 3 years.

cyclehelmets.org used to have some information about replacing helmets, but I can't find it on their site.
“In some ways, it is easier to be a dissident, for then one is without responsibility.”
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom

xpc316e
Posts: 293
Joined: 5 Sep 2008, 11:10pm
Location: Bury St Edmunds, UK

Re: Helmet Lifetime - Really?

Postby xpc316e » 28 Mar 2011, 11:00am

I saw a woman yesterday in Cambridge who had a helmet that was obviously bought when God was a boy. Nearly all of the outer plastic shell was missing and as I understand it, this serves to distribute forces over a larger area should the helmet be impacted. This particular helmet needed to be replaced, but sadly any new one would probably be worn as this one was - on the back of the head and with straps so loose as to render it useless. This kind of report needs to be more widely brought to notice.
Last edited by xpc316e on 7 Apr 2011, 8:47am, edited 1 time in total.
Riding a Dahon Jetstream P9 folder, a Claud Butler Cape Wrath MTB, and the latest acquisition, an early 90s Vision R30 above seat steered recumbent.

User avatar
Steve Kish
Posts: 714
Joined: 11 Sep 2010, 9:50pm

Re: Helmet Lifetime - Really?

Postby Steve Kish » 28 Mar 2011, 10:28pm

FWIW, my 1991 Spesh Sub Zero is still in active service but if I ever have a wallop in one, it's a one way trip to Dustbin City for it! 8)
Old enough to know better but too young to care.

User avatar
NUKe
Posts: 3986
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 11:07pm
Location: Suffolk

Re: Helmet Lifetime - Really?

Postby NUKe » 29 Mar 2011, 12:13am

xpc316e wrote:. Nearly all of the outer plastic shell was missing and as I understand it, this serves to distribute forces over a larger area should the helmet be impacted.

The plastic on cycle helmet is little more than decorative. The forces dispersion idea comes from Motorcycle helmets, where the shell is much harder and designed to disperse forces. As does the 3 year rules which comes from ACU racing rules of the 90's. They may be even stricter now.
NUKe
_____________________________________