pete75 wrote:Though really the old anarchist saying "don't vote it only encourages them" is most appropriate here.
There is a 60's Si Fi story about a stable anarchist society whose only tender is "myob" , my obligation. If some one does something for you, you must do something for them ... Do you think we can slip this past the trustees ...????
I like that - but I prefer "someone does something for you, and you do something for someone else". In other words, the 'debt' is to the community rather than to the person who did you the favour. I speak as a pragmatic anarchist,
There was a film about a school kid in.America who did good deeds for people then asked them to "pay it forward". Basically that created a domino effect of good deeds without rewards. You do a good deed in the knowledge you will not get anything back.directly for it. No thank you nothing but the satisfaction of doing good.
It was a heart warming film but I can't remember the name of it. I seem to remember the kid was going through a hard time when he was doing this. Also the pay it forward started a movement in that small town America which spread across USA i believe. All a story though.
Personally I've done good deeds kind of like that and you do get something back. It feels good to do good without acknowledgement or gain.
I've chafed a few times from moderator intervention, usually for using over-expressive terminology.
However, I can only applaud the CTC oops CUK for even having a forum: when I suggested the same thing to the FFCT's Departmental Committee years ago the reaction was (paraphrase) "Good God no! People could criticise us!"
Providing a platform for discussion and informal exchanges is a sign of a (relatively) healthy organisation, whether or not you agree with its policies or the callous junking of a name with a long and noble history**.
**you'll gather that I don't. My father's pre-WW2 CTC badge is one of our prized heirlooms.
Audax67 wrote:I've chafed a few times from moderator intervention, usually for using over-expressive terminology.
However, I can only applaud the CTC oops CUK for even having a forum: when I suggested the same thing to the FFCT's Departmental Committee years ago the reaction was (paraphrase) "Good God no! People could criticise us!"
Providing a platform for discussion and informal exchanges is a sign of a (relatively) healthy organisation, whether or not you agree with its policies or the callous junking of a name with a long and noble history**.
**you'll gather that I don't. My father's pre-WW2 CTC badge is one of our prized heirlooms.
But we should be allowed to criticise freely without the Fear of excommunication................... based on the rather undemocratic power?
NA Thinks Just End 2 End Return + Bivvy - Some day Soon I hope You'll Still Find Me At The Top Of A Hill Please forgive the poor Grammar I blame it on my mobile and phat thinkers.