bovlomov wrote:Did they?
Discuss.
The referendum simply asked us whether we wanted to leave or to remain.That leaves May a lot of room for negotiation, but she shouldn't claim a mandate for anything further than that. What we think about immigration, free movement, trade terms or treaties is simply her interpretation. The Leave result can be respected just as faithfully under the Norwegian model (free trade and free movement) as it can under an isolationist model. The will of the people is not part of the decision, because the people weren't asked.
This is May though.
A woman that introduced the "psychoactive substances bill", a bill that effectively makes almost everything illegal so broad is its scope (despite evidence from experts).
She's also responsible for the "Surveillance Bill", another roundly condemned by experts as being impossible to implement. (Requiring internet providers to provide access to encrypted communications - you don't need to be much of an expert to realise communications are encrypted between peers and the provider couldn't break them if they wanted to).
They're not the only two where she roundly ignores experts and other opinions, so in that respect I'd fully expect her to use the vote to push through whatever agenda suits herself rather than what anyone actually wants.