reohn2 wrote:Bonefishblues wrote:I admit I try, and also guilty as charged of generally trying to impute the best motives in people, and certainly guilty of trying to counteract some of the lazy and usually unhelpful stereotyping of the "opposition" by either "side". I think that most people are fundamentally decent, even where their views differ.
I've just started a thread about surgeons who tattoo their patients on the inside of their bodies without their consent.
Based on a current news story,after listing to the JV phone in on R2,it seems,going off the callers it's quite reasonable for a surgeon like any "artist" to sign his work,those callers would term themselves as reasonable decent citizens with balanced views.
I think those people are unbalanced to think the way they do........
...or those callers might be wholly unrepresentative, hand picked for just those views even, which might just be a way for the Former Journalist called Jeremy Vine to drive ratings and try to justify his 800K (or so, I forget) stipend from the BBC annually. I know I sound like a cracked record on this critical examination lark, but it really is so necessary with our being fed carp day and night.