Meanwhile, in other news (armed police.)

Use this board for general non-cycling-related chat, or to introduce yourself to the forum.
thirdcrank
Posts: 36780
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Meanwhile, in other news (armed police.)

Post by thirdcrank »

irc wrote: ... Pretty rare. There was also the attempted kidnap of Princess Anne in 1974. her bodyguard was armed. ...


An excellent example and one from which lessons were learned. A lot of bravery also from members of the public.

BTW, you probably n0ticed I restricted my comments to E&W. I believe Police Scotland introduced a policy of routinely arming officers working in remote areas which was controversial. Completely outside my knowledge so I didn't refer to it.
User avatar
bovlomov
Posts: 4202
Joined: 5 Apr 2007, 7:45am
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile, in other news (armed police.)

Post by bovlomov »

Barks wrote:No-one in the UK Police Forces and the Military takes this subject lightly and it is important that the general public, including those that might have an anti-establisment philosophical view, recognise that.

The police have shot few people in mainland Britain in my lifetime, which indicates that procedures are working pretty well. But if the state wants the trust of those with anti-establishment views, it should do a better job at investigating its officers.

Whether or not the courts were right to find that Duggan and De Menezes were lawfully killed, in both cases police evidence was inconsistent and there are strong grounds to suppose that there was a cover up. Even pro-establishment people should worry about that.
Shootist
Posts: 537
Joined: 20 Sep 2012, 8:50pm
Location: Derby

Re: Meanwhile, in other news (armed police.)

Post by Shootist »

bovlomov wrote:Whether or not the courts were right to find that Duggan and De Menezes were lawfully killed, in both cases police evidence was inconsistent and there are strong grounds to suppose that there was a cover up. Even pro-establishment people should worry about that.


On that. at least, We agree completely.
Pacifists cannot accept the statement "Those who 'abjure' violence can do so only because others are committing violence on their behalf.", despite it being "grossly obvious."
[George Orwell]
thirdcrank
Posts: 36780
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Meanwhile, in other news (armed police.)

Post by thirdcrank »

Flinders wrote: ... I'd far rather trust the military than the police when it comes to situations with firearms. It seems to me that's more in their line of work, and I'm all for specialisation..................


Sorry to be winding back, but I'd prefer to concentrate on things that have happened rather than speculative scenarios.

I've little experience of the armed services and most of what little I have had has been with what are colloquially known as bomb disposal. I can only say that their skill and bravery seem only to be matched by their modesty. However, I don't observe the armed forces more generally through tinted specs.

It must be obvious that more firearms = a greater risk of firearms related trouble - one of the biggest advatages IMO of police who are not routinely armed - but some of the armed forces' reported incidents don't instil confidence. This report about the murder of a Royal Navy submarine's commanding officer by an armed naval guard has some amazing evidence about who is considered suitable to carry firearms.

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/1014082 ... _revealed/

There's been a lot of media publicity recently about deaths of soldiers at Deepcut Barracks. It seems a common pattern has been that young, inexperienced people still in training have been posted alone on nightime guard duty with a powerful firearm. There must have been countless times when such sentries have completed a period of duty alive and well and emerged with that bit more experience but it does seem to be risky.

The only terrorist incident I can immediately remember in England when the police handed over control to the Army was at the siege of the Iranian Embassy. Tactically brilliant (a phrase I've chosen to keep it to the way firearms are used) but if canteen gossip remembered from that time is correct, it was officially considered something of a failure to the extent that one of the hostage-takers "mingled with the crowd" and so was not killed with all his fellow conspirators.

Since I retired, there have been proposals for direct entry to the senior ranks of English police forces: former services officers and American police chiefs have been offered as examples of the type of people who would be ideal. Perhaps the govt., feels that people experienced in using firearms as a first option are better able to lead in these troubled times than are those still more used to other approaches. :?:
===================================================================
Forgot this:

the police had not cordoned off the area before starting their fun and games.


With no knowledge of what started this incident it's only possible to offer general comment, but I cannot see how if something starts unexpectedly, it's possible to arrange things like a cordon. Where would the people be found to do it so quickly? AFAIK, the general arrangement now for dealing with unplanned firearms incidents is that armed officers attend in incident cars - prompt attendance being of the essence. Without wanting to sound facetious, I can't see how it would be possible to replace them with personnel carriers, with a dozen people in the back.

What brought me back to this was thinking about the only firearms incident I've witnessed as a passer-by. Some years ago, before Sunday trading, we were driving back from holiday along Wetherby Road in Leeds approaching the major junction commonly known as the Fforde Grene (after the pub.) Traffic was held up and as we slowly moved forward, I eventually saw a police war with beacon flashing. A bit nearer and you could see armed uniform police challenging the occupants of a car. Nearer still and looking ahead instead of at the action, I saw somebody in plain clothes (presumably a policeman) trying to direct traffic. Not text book. I checked afterwards and it was an unplanned but operationally necessary action against people with firearms. Unlike films, there's not always time to plan the set nor to do a few retakes till it seems OK.

One of the things I realised seeing that was how complicated things would have become on a busier day if a sympathetic crowd had formed with some deciding to get involved.
thirdcrank
Posts: 36780
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Meanwhile, in other news (armed police.)

Post by thirdcrank »

The BBC News www has carried two stories on the subject of more armed police for London today (26 October) The first seems to have been initiated by the Police Federation and slipped off the front page very quickly (am I right that this indicates few clicks?)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-37762369

The second seems to have been initiated by the British Transport Police and seems to contradict itself:

(The British Transport Police) says the presence of uniformed marksmen on the Underground will reassure the public and allow them to reach their destinations more quickly.

BTP insists there will not be armed patrols in carriages, but rather a new way for officers moving between jobs.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-37778096

Both items are illustrated with the same pic from the Met commissioner's photo opportunity of armed police, and the BTP report has two heavily armed officers in front of the thin blue line version of the Union Flag.
User avatar
bovlomov
Posts: 4202
Joined: 5 Apr 2007, 7:45am
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile, in other news (armed police.)

Post by bovlomov »

A story in today's Guardian: UK border security gaps could let terrorists bring in weapons, says report

"Our borders are not as secure as they should be and much greater efforts should be made to prevent the illegal transportation of weapons and people into the country.

“It would be naive in the extreme to assume that would-be terrorists will not attempt to exploit any such weaknesses.

The mayor should seek, nationally, assurances that the routine screening and searching of cars and freight entering the country is being significantly enhanced, with an uplift in land-based and sea-based border force coverage"


If there's a man to spare*, is he better used in armed response or in border protection?
*or a woman to spare
thirdcrank
Posts: 36780
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Meanwhile, in other news (armed police.)

Post by thirdcrank »

On a more important note,

Supermarket chain Morrisons has increased the cost of a jar of Marmite by 12.5%, say retail industry experts.
(My emphasis.)


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37801847
User avatar
bovlomov
Posts: 4202
Joined: 5 Apr 2007, 7:45am
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile, in other news (armed police.)

Post by bovlomov »

thirdcrank wrote:On a more important note,

Supermarket chain Morrisons has increased the cost of a jar of Marmite by 12.5%, say retail industry experts.
(My emphasis.)


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37801847

We know not to believe experts. We need a second opinion - will someone check the shelves at Morrisons?
Shootist
Posts: 537
Joined: 20 Sep 2012, 8:50pm
Location: Derby

Re: Meanwhile, in other news (armed police.)

Post by Shootist »

I hear imported snuff has gone up by four pence. :shock:
Pacifists cannot accept the statement "Those who 'abjure' violence can do so only because others are committing violence on their behalf.", despite it being "grossly obvious."
[George Orwell]
thirdcrank
Posts: 36780
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Meanwhile, in other news (armed police.)

Post by thirdcrank »

Another relatively minor news item today floating the possibility of routinely-armed police in rural areas. It's not actually happening, of course, but possible by drift, rather than a formal decision.

Rural police 'could routinely carry guns'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44151242

Briefly, the logic seems to be it's the cheapest way to do it, without openly accepting that it must mean that firearms are routinely carried by people trained to a lower standard.
Post Reply