Bonefishblues wrote:Was it not Tina Turner who sang "What's Policy got to do, got to do with it?" or do I misremember
But did you see her hairstyle
Bonefishblues wrote:Was it not Tina Turner who sang "What's Policy got to do, got to do with it?" or do I misremember
pliptrot wrote:old_windbag wrote:Vorpal I'm beginning to think we should ring fence london off( m25 is useful boundary ) and declare it a country in it's own right. We can then look after the needs of the rest of the uk( maybe have manchester as capital ) and let the new country londinium govern itself and fund it's infrastructure needs.
Not the first time such a good idea has been posited. Some have made the comparison with Singapore, and those who think Singapore is a good example of -err,- anything, clearly don't know the place. There, as elsewhere it seems, anyone who actually does anything is astonishing badly rewarded. How people survive in the place is beyond me. London will be much like that before long (it is a bit like that now) and I cannot see how that is a good thing for us not in London, nor for the majority in London. What people miss is that wealth is created by adding value to something - passing money around between banks and bumping along on the bottom selling each other houses do not do that. The quicker we isolate London and gept on with what matters the better.
Bonefishblues wrote:Indeed, of all the political backfires in recent times, that one's right up there!
Psamathe wrote:But the issue is more that O actually don't really have a choice because rightly or wrongly enough of the electorate think he is such a disaster (as in him personally, his skills as a leader, how he comes across, etc.) that it seems he will not get elected. However excellent his policies, he is so bad at talking nobody listens.
mjr wrote:But the key issue is: we know Corbyn cycles, we know Farron cycles viewtopic.php?f=6&t=77250 , we know Lucas cycles https://www.carolinelucas.com/latest/cy ... e-seagulls but I'm not sure about Bartley. Why should we vote for a party led by someone who doesn't cycle?
Cyril Haearn wrote:mjr wrote:But the key issue is: we know Corbyn cycles, we know Farron cycles viewtopic.php?f=6&t=77250 , we know Lucas cycles https://www.carolinelucas.com/latest/cy ... e-seagulls but I'm not sure about Bartley. Why should we vote for a party led by someone who doesn't cycle?
Who is Bartley?
Does UK€P cycle?
Does Leanne Wood cycle?
bovlomov wrote:Bonefishblues wrote:Indeed, of all the political backfires in recent times, that one's right up there!
Both sides, the members and the PLP, are merely exercising their rights under the Labour constitution.
The root of the problem is a rule change that has set the scene for a conflict between the members and the PLP, that apparently no one foresaw. As far as I remember, the change was supported across the party, from Blair to Ed Miliband.
Unintended consequences.