Boyd wrote:bovlomov wrote:francovendee wrote:The UK, the USA and now France, whatever else it does, it points to the political establishment having failed to connect with the voters
There's certainly an element of that. But these movements are a lot more complicated than the cry of the dispossessed. They are partly driven by rich and powerful interests in anti-establishment fancy dress, using the media they control, to promote their own agendas.
I agree that Trump, Putin, hedge fund managers, Dacre, press barons and assorted billionaires, have connected with the voters. I question their anti-establishment credentials, and whether many of the voters have been disconnected hitherto. For example, you could hardly describe all those Home Counties Leave supporters as politically disconnected.
"hedge fund managers" have connected with voters? Seriously? I am ignoring your other "connected with voters"
"you could hardly describe all those Home Counties Leave supporters as politically disconnected" Is Lincolnshire in the home counties? Is all the working class (the actual disposed) areas who voted decisively to leave in the in the home counties? Did the home counties actually vote to leave? Do you really think "hedge fund managers, Dacre, press barons and assorted billionaires," connected with voters....ludicrous they are the remainers.
I'm not sure what you mean. Some punctuation would help.
To clarify my post:
I'm saying that Brexit supporters come in many forms, and they are as present among the rich and comfortably off as they are among the poor and dispossessed.
I'm sure some hedge fund billionaires backed Remain, but some certainly funded UKIP and the Leave campaign. Dacre, Rothermere, Murdoch, Desmond, and the Barclay twins backed Leave.
The status of Lincolnshire and its electorate is not relevant to my post.
Can you explain what is ludicrous?