Why can't cyclists spell?

Use this board for general non-cycling-related chat, or to introduce yourself to the forum.
MikeF
Posts: 4347
Joined: 11 Nov 2012, 9:24am
Location: On the borders of the four South East Counties

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by MikeF »

"Your" instead of "You're" is my gripe. I don't even pronounce them the same, so I'm always puzzled why the error is so frequent! However I know some people have difficulty with spelling many words for various reasons, so I have to accept that. I'm not immune to errors either even if I do know the mistake. :wink:
"It takes a genius to spot the obvious" - my old physics master.
I don't peddle bikes.
keyboardmonkey
Posts: 1123
Joined: 1 Dec 2009, 5:05pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by keyboardmonkey »

Who doesn't enjoy sitting down with a hot drink to pour over a map?
PH
Posts: 13122
Joined: 21 Jan 2007, 12:31am
Location: Derby
Contact:

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by PH »

I wish people wouldn't think of cyclists as some sort of homogenised group.
I'm a cyclist, you're a cyclist, why anyone would think we have anything else in common is beyond me.
User avatar
gaz
Posts: 14664
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by gaz »

keyboardmonkey wrote:Who doesn't enjoy sitting down with a hot drink to pour over a map?

To quote Officer Crabtree,
I have a mop. Would you like to take a leak?
High on a cocktail of flossy teacakes and marmalade
Bonefishblues
Posts: 11043
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by Bonefishblues »

PH wrote:I wish people wouldn't think of cyclists as some sort of homogenised group.
I'm a cyclist, you're a cyclist, why anyone would think we have anything else in common is beyond me.

Other than our common intent to kerb our instinct to ride into a curb :D
Ben@Forest
Posts: 3647
Joined: 28 Jan 2013, 5:58pm

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by Ben@Forest »

Eye halve a spelling chequer
It came with my pea sea
It plainly marques four my revue
Miss steaks eye kin knot sea.
Eye strike a quay and type a word
And weight four it two say
Weather eye am wrong oar write
It shows me strait a weigh.
As soon as a mist ache is maid
It nose bee fore two long
And eye can put the error rite
Its really ever wrong.
Eye have run this poem threw it
I am shore your pleased two no
Its letter perfect awl the weigh
My chequer tolled me sew.

(Sauce unknown)


The above is old and pre-dates the fact that word processing software often 'checks' grammar as well nowadays, which would recognise that many of the constructions do not make sense. But to some extent we're all guilty, recently I saw a sandwich shop sign which stated 'Sandwiches, Baguettes, Toasties and Panini's'. Why the last rogue apostrophe? But also 'panini' is plural anyway - every time we order one such item we should say ''panino' - but (probably excepting Italian tourists) who does?
mercalia
Posts: 14630
Joined: 22 Sep 2013, 10:03pm
Location: london South

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by mercalia »

well I think the tyranny of dictionaries is a modern thing? in days gone by spelling was more fluid? and any way you cant trust spell checkers I seem to to remember is it surprize or surprise? I seem to read that the Z one is now archaic but why as it writes as you sound it? with a "z" not an "s" sur-price silly, I always used the Z one.

Image

We shouldnt let the BBC/"Educated"/Oxford/Cambridge tyrants cajole us into their versions - eg my home town Lowestoft is pronounced ( by fewer these days due to the said tyranny ) with 2 syllables Lowsss-tugh+f ( with a long s) not low-es-toft with a "t" at the end - I think old maps have it Lestoft. Fortunately even they havent been able to "adjust" Happisburgh a town in Norfolk to happ-is-burg - (Pronounced "Haze-bruh", and spelt 'Hapesburg' in the Domesday Book). As I said else where dictionaries and grammar books should be regarded as scientific theories not rods to beat people with eg "earnt" if it aint in the OED, the dictionary is just wrong?
Last edited by mercalia on 4 Aug 2017, 12:24pm, edited 5 times in total.
Ben@Forest
Posts: 3647
Joined: 28 Jan 2013, 5:58pm

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by Ben@Forest »

mercalia wrote:well I think the tyranny of dictionaries is a modern thing? in days gone by spelling was more fluid? and any way you cant trust spell checkers I seem to to remember is it surprize or surprise? I seem to read that the Z one is now archaic but why as it writes as you sound it? with a "z" not an "s" sur-price silly I always used the Z one


I think you're right about 'surprize' being an archaic spelling, but I suppose it depends whether you want to conform with what is accepted today. Certainly up to the 18th century we said 'sennight' to describe a week (a shortening of seven nights just as fortnight is a shortening of fourteen nights) but if you said 'sennight' to anyone now they'd just give you a confused look.
mercalia
Posts: 14630
Joined: 22 Sep 2013, 10:03pm
Location: london South

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by mercalia »

whoof wrote:I wish that people would stop saying things such as 'you will be walking up the hills in that gear' or '23mm tyres will rattle your fillings out' when they mean 'I would be walking up the hills in that gear' and '23mm tyres will rattle out my fillings'.



that would be wrong and not say the same thing? the "you" is more like the French "vous" than "tu"? Posh so-and-sos could say "one will be walking.."
cotterpins
Posts: 221
Joined: 6 Apr 2016, 9:38pm

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by cotterpins »

"Tour De Frances" gets me!
gbnz
Posts: 2560
Joined: 13 Sep 2008, 10:38am

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by gbnz »

foxyrider wrote:One regular of course is breaking performance, there are some destructive people out there - must be due to not using their brakes!


To be fair, braking with your breaks appears to be fairly common.
whoof
Posts: 2519
Joined: 29 Apr 2014, 2:13pm

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by whoof »

mercalia wrote:
whoof wrote:I wish that people would stop saying things such as 'you will be walking up the hills in that gear' or '23mm tyres will rattle your fillings out' when they mean 'I would be walking up the hills in that gear' and '23mm tyres will rattle out my fillings'.



that would be wrong and not say the same thing? the "you" is more like the French "vous" than "tu"? Posh so-and-sos could say "one will be walking.."



I know it's not the same thing that's the point.
gbnz
Posts: 2560
Joined: 13 Sep 2008, 10:38am

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by gbnz »

TrevA wrote:Breaks instead of Brakes is another favourite!


My apologies, I hadn't read that far through the replies
Vorpal
Moderator
Posts: 20720
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 3:34pm
Location: Not there ;)

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by Vorpal »

How about, why can't people spell? Maybe because some people find it difficult and others just aren't bothered as long other understand them?

Maybe because there are more important things in life for many people?

I'm a professional, so I need to be able to use good spelling and grammar, but outside of professions where that is required, I don't see that it makes any difference unless it interferes with understanding. My mother was a pendant, and I used to be one, but after years of working with people who communicate effectively in multiple languages, I really don't see how it matters, as long as people can still communicate.

I generally find cyclists to be somewhat better at spelling than a random group of people.
“In some ways, it is easier to be a dissident, for then one is without responsibility.”
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
mercalia
Posts: 14630
Joined: 22 Sep 2013, 10:03pm
Location: london South

Re: Why can't cyclists spell?

Post by mercalia »

Vorpal wrote:How about, why can't people spell? Maybe because some people find it difficult and others just aren't bothered as long other understand them?

Maybe because there are more important things in life for many people?

I'm a professional, so I need to be able to use good spelling and grammar, but outside of professions where that is required, I don't see that it makes any difference unless it interferes with understanding. My mother was a pendant, and I used to be one, but after years of working with people who communicate effectively in multiple languages, I really don't see how it matters, as long as people can still communicate.

I generally find cyclists to be somewhat better at spelling than a random group of people.


I have noticed as I get older my spelling a bit off some times
Post Reply