Individuals

Use this board for general non-cycling-related chat, or to introduce yourself to the forum.
thirdcrank
Posts: 36781
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Individuals

Post by thirdcrank »

Burchfield's Third Edition of Fowler has a detailed entry on this but it runs to half a page so I don't intend to retype it here or to try to summarize it which would seem impertinent.

Anyway, I see there's now a new edition. They do seem to be published with increasing frequency. £15-86 at Amozon for anybody who likes to feel they've been proved right.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Fowlers-Dictio ... lish+usage
User avatar
661-Pete
Posts: 10593
Joined: 22 Nov 2012, 8:45pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Individuals

Post by 661-Pete »

Mick F wrote:I'm not complaining about the word "individual" but it's use as a noun to describe a single separate person.
Individual is opposite to general. There are many individual things in the world, but they are things, not people. People deserve better than being called "an individual".
"Individual" has since time immemorial been used as a noun, to refer to a person, etc. From my copy of Chambers:
Individual n a single person, animal, plant or thing considered as a separate member of its species or as having an independent existence; a person (inf)
Note that the "(inf)" means "informal", but informal language still has its place.

Talking of which, and seeing as this is a thread essentially about English usage, it would not be out-of-place, surely, to draw attention to the incorrect use of apostrophes...? :lol:
Suppose that this room is a lift. The support breaks and down we go with ever-increasing velocity.
Let us pass the time by performing physical experiments...
--- Arthur Eddington (creator of the Eddington Number).
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56367
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: Individuals

Post by Mick F »

Yes, informal it's fine.
Not formal.

"Its use" is correct.

"Its" is used but when "it's" refers to "it is" ............ and to use the possessive apostrophe would be confusing.
Mick F. Cornwall
thirdcrank
Posts: 36781
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Individuals

Post by thirdcrank »

Mick F wrote: ... but it's use as a noun ...


I speak as a mere foot soldier in the Greengrocers Patrol, of which my wife is regimental colonel.
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56367
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: Individuals

Post by Mick F »

I would agree if I'd said it's used as a noun, but I said its use as a noun.

You don't insert an apostrophe in its when it's a possessive. It confuses the reader. :wink:


Edit:
I made a mistake. :oops:
I meant to mean its, but said it's. :oops:
Typo.
Mick F. Cornwall
User avatar
661-Pete
Posts: 10593
Joined: 22 Nov 2012, 8:45pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Individuals

Post by 661-Pete »

Hooray! Mick F got there in the end! :lol:
Suppose that this room is a lift. The support breaks and down we go with ever-increasing velocity.
Let us pass the time by performing physical experiments...
--- Arthur Eddington (creator of the Eddington Number).
User avatar
Cugel
Posts: 5430
Joined: 13 Nov 2017, 11:14am

Re: Individuals

Post by Cugel »

Is there such a thing as an individual? I've never met one. Every person I meet seems composed of, and enmeshed in, a great vortex of other persons, not to mention the historical meme-nets in which we all are caught, via the language and all it's Pandora escapees.

Including "me" (whatever that is).

Mind, there is the odd wolf-boy ... but even those lads tend to be part of a pack.

Even our physical singularity is an illusion, since a large percentage of "me" is composed on various bugs and bits with a life of their own, including the gut-bugs who will help you digest your meat & three veg one day but consume the rest of your body should you weaken to a significant degree! They don't mind if "you" die as you are as delicious as the three veg or perhaps more so.

As to the Ayn Rand heroic variety of individual, supposedly generating wonderful new stuff in top-entrepreneur fashion entirely out of their own clever heads with no reference to the other humans or cultures or societies or their parents or their teachers or.... anyone - why, the rascals are actually stealing the notions and designs of countless others who went before them, back to the year dot! Then they paint them a different colour and call them Apple.........

Individuals? Pah! :-)

Cugel, just another cipher in The Great Human Spectacle.
“Practical men who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence are usually the slaves of some defunct economist”.
John Maynard Keynes
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 15215
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Individuals

Post by Cyril Haearn »

thirdcrank wrote:
Mick F wrote: ... but it's use as a noun ...


I speak as a mere foot soldier in the Greengrocers Patrol, of which my wife is regimental colonel.

Perhaps you could help younger fora members by explaining what a Greengrocer is (was?) :wink:
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 15215
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Individuals

Post by Cyril Haearn »

I love the diversity of language, even police language
Proceed, individual, alleged offence. There must be plenty more, +99
..
I prefer to get heated up about incorrect use of language, people write about "keeping to the speed limit" when I think they should be using "below" and "maximum"
Unless they are writing about *minimum* speed limits of course :?
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56367
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: Individuals

Post by Mick F »

What about "persons or persons unknown"?
Why not "individuals or individuals unknown"? Too long and difficult to say perhaps.

If they can use "person", why do they use "individual" at all?
Mick F. Cornwall
User avatar
661-Pete
Posts: 10593
Joined: 22 Nov 2012, 8:45pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Individuals

Post by 661-Pete »

Cyril Haearn wrote:
thirdcrank wrote:I speak as a mere foot soldier in the Greengrocers Patrol, of which my wife is regimental colonel.

Perhaps you could help younger fora members by explaining what a Greengrocer is (was?) :wink:

That's easy! Greengrocer's were friendly high-street purveyor's of apple's, pear's, potato's, cabbage's, and apostrophe's. Those last were indisputably their biggest-selling and most popular produce...
Suppose that this room is a lift. The support breaks and down we go with ever-increasing velocity.
Let us pass the time by performing physical experiments...
--- Arthur Eddington (creator of the Eddington Number).
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56367
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: Individuals

Post by Mick F »

There's a pub in the village.
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@50.52443 ... 312!8i6656
They now have a blackboard outside advertising eat-in or take-away pasty's.
Mick F. Cornwall
philvantwo
Posts: 1730
Joined: 8 Dec 2012, 6:08pm

Re: Individuals

Post by philvantwo »

You'll have to grow a beard Mick F, then you can go to that pub for a hairy biker breakfast!! :lol: :lol:
Post Reply