mercalia wrote:
"I told you so," is an unattractive gloat.
maybe. As bad as those saying he was an innocent cherub.[/quote]
I don't find gloating over something like this shows the gloater in a pleasant light.
mercalia wrote:
"I told you so," is an unattractive gloat.
Mike Sales wrote:Mike Sales wrote:
"I told you so," is an unattractive gloat.mercalia wrote:maybe. As bad as those saying he was an innocent cherub.
I don't find gloating over something like this shows the gloater in a pleasant light.
Exactly.reohn2 wrote:Such cases beg the question,why?
Why did he deal drugs?
Why did he get sucked into such a lifestyle?
Why weren't the police able to stop it?
Why wasn't there support in the community to help him ?
Why are drugs needed to cope with life?
Why isn't there an alternative to violence?
Mick F wrote:Exactly.reohn2 wrote:Such cases beg the question,why?
Why did he deal drugs?
Why did he get sucked into such a lifestyle?
Why weren't the police able to stop it?
Why wasn't there support in the community to help him ?
Why are drugs needed to cope with life?
Why isn't there an alternative to violence?
Even the murderers are victims.
Mike Sales wrote:Mick F wrote:Exactly.reohn2 wrote:Such cases beg the question,why?
Why did he deal drugs?
Why did he get sucked into such a lifestyle?
Why weren't the police able to stop it?
Why wasn't there support in the community to help him ?
Why are drugs needed to cope with life?
Why isn't there an alternative to violence?
Even the murderers are victims.
To write a child off at fourteen, to refuse him sympathy, well, I am lost for a word to describe that attitude.
Do these people know any fourteen year olds? Do they have no imagination?
100%JR wrote:Well,well,well.....
It transpires this model citizen was indeed a drug dealer!
Killed by a rival drug gang.
Some of us see the blindingly obvious,others decide to try to see the best in things and accuse us of jumping the gun and stereotyping
As I said upthread months ago he wasn’t the little innocent his family portrayed.
Vorpal wrote:Does he have to be an innocent cherub to deserve justice?
To be honest, I don't think that the background of victims of violence should be published. It's common practice in the USA, when the police kill someone, to release all of the 'smear' facts they can, as if it somehow justifies taking a life.
mercalia wrote:Vorpal wrote:Does he have to be an innocent cherub to deserve justice?
To be honest, I don't think that the background of victims of violence should be published. It's common practice in the USA, when the police kill someone, to release all of the 'smear' facts they can, as if it somehow justifies taking a life.
who is saying they dont deserve justice? Some here have rose tinted spectacles about "children" The idea of chiidhood is a modern invention that didnt use to exist - there was the childrens crusade ( which ended badly). Look at the life of Joan of Arc who was 13 when she started to have visions and 16 when she became active. ( burnt at the stake when 19 ( she claimed she was)).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_of_Arc
A more recent example is Greta Thunberg born 3 January 2003 so is only 16 became active when she was 15
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greta_Thunberg
At that recent todo outside that cinema showing that film about gangs one of the "children" was a young girl of 13 I believe with a machete.
Mike Sales wrote:To write a child off at fourteen, to refuse him sympathy, well, I am lost for a word to describe that attitude.
Do these people know any fourteen year olds? Do they have no imagination?
roubaixtuesday wrote:Your attempt to condemn the victim only results in you condemning yourself.
Mike Sales wrote:mercalia wrote:Vorpal wrote:Does he have to be an innocent cherub to deserve justice?
To be honest, I don't think that the background of victims of violence should be published. It's common practice in the USA, when the police kill someone, to release all of the 'smear' facts they can, as if it somehow justifies taking a life.
who is saying they dont deserve justice? Some here have rose tinted spectacles about "children" The idea of chiidhood is a modern invention that didnt use to exist - there was the childrens crusade ( which ended badly). Look at the life of Joan of Arc who was 13 when she started to have visions and 16 when she became active. ( burnt at the stake when 19 ( she claimed she was)).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_of_Arc
A more recent example is Greta Thunberg born 3 January 2003 so is only 16 became active when she was 15
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greta_Thunberg
At that recent todo outside that cinema showing that film about gangs one of the "children" was a young girl of 13 I believe with a machete.
Thompson and Venables were even younger when they killed Jamie Bulger.
What do you deduce from that?
That children of that age should be treated as adult?
mercalia wrote:.....maybe children should be treated more like adults and adults like children?
100%JR wrote:For me it's one less scumbag off the streets.
As we see with all the recent stabbings at least the scum are doing the Tax payer a service by killing each other.
He was a thief,a drug dealer and gang member so it's actually quite fitting his life ended as it did.
I have absolutely no sympathy for him and his ilk.
Good riddance.
Do any of you actually know anyone who's died as a result of drugs?
Do any of you know anyone killed by "postcode" gangs?
These parasites deserve everything they get whether they're 14,24 or 44