windmiller wrote:ok I won and you didn't.
Democacy did win though and thank the Gods' for that.
None of this is a surprise to me, just a shame that the country took so long to come to its' senses
Apostrophe's is a different thread.
windmiller wrote:ok I won and you didn't.
Democacy did win though and thank the Gods' for that.
None of this is a surprise to me, just a shame that the country took so long to come to its' senses
pete75 wrote:kwackers wrote:pete75 wrote:Well you're probably a lot more wealthy than me. I'm retired and on a pension which is no more than the national average salary so my income is er average.
I think if you're retired and on an average wage that makes you a pretty wealthy pensioner.
I don't know any pensioners that even come close (if they do they keep it quiet).
How big a pension pot would one need to get an average (£25k?) wage? Hmm, £500k according to the online calculators.
I wonder how many folk have a pot that big...
It's a work pension not from a so called pension pot. I know quite a few pensioners who have a hell of a lot more than me. Anyhow wealth is nothing to do with whether or not you're a pensioner it's to do with what your income is. If someone earns say £30,000 a year they're not wealthy. If they were to retire and, for some reason, have a retirement income of £30,000 they haven't suddenly become wealthy , they've stayed the same.
pete75 wrote:kwackers wrote:It's a work pension not from a so called pension pot. I know quite a few pensioners who have a hell of a lot more than me. Anyhow wealth is nothing to do with whether or not you're a pensioner it's to do with what your income is. If someone earns say £30,000 a year they're not wealthy. If they were to retire and, for some reason, have a retirement income of £30,000 they haven't suddenly become wealthy , they've stayed the same.
Polisman wrote:
5. Goodbye food standards and animal welfare. Rees Mogg said as much in April. Food 'checked' in other countries ie Australian beef of American chlorinated chicken will not be checked again on entering the UK. Hello food poisoning and meat full of steroids and other big pharma junk.
bovlomov wrote:windmiller wrote:ok I won and you didn't.
Democacy did win though and thank the Gods' for that.
None of this is a surprise to me, just a shame that the country took so long to come to its' senses
Apostrophe's is a different thread.
kwackers wrote:pete75 wrote:kwackers wrote:It's a work pension not from a so called pension pot. I know quite a few pensioners who have a hell of a lot more than me. Anyhow wealth is nothing to do with whether or not you're a pensioner it's to do with what your income is. If someone earns say £30,000 a year they're not wealthy. If they were to retire and, for some reason, have a retirement income of £30,000 they haven't suddenly become wealthy , they've stayed the same.
I agree, but for a pensioner to be on average wage is still pretty good. Might make you an average earner but you're by no means an average pensioner.
The one plus is that by the time you retire you've hopefully paid off your mortgage and have enough savings for capital expenditure. (That's my hope anyway).
Polisman wrote:
Here's a few things to look forward to:
1. Brexit and a trade deal with Europe kicked into the long grass. Brexit wont get 'done' effectively till at least 2025 but more likely 2030. It took Canada 7 years to get a trade deal with the EU and that was infinitely easier to conclude.
2. Mandatory health insurance. Piece by piece the NHS will be dismantled and flogged to the Americans, slowly at first, so as you don't realise what's going on. Till its to late.
3. 40-60% increase in prescription charges. The gloves are off now and no more pesky patents legislation to bother our US providers.
4. No more paid holidays or sick leave. We have a new partner to get into alignment with, their boss goes by the name of Donald. We just swap one centralised dictator for another.
5. Goodbye food standards and animal welfare. Rees Mogg said as much in April. Food 'checked' in other countries ie Australian beef of American chlorinated chicken will not be checked again on entering the UK. Hello food poisoning and meat full of steroids and other big pharma junk.
6. 10 more years of brutal cuts and austerity. The national debt has grown in the past three years not shrunk.
7. Retirement age increased across the board, probably tax increases on pensions also.
pwa wrote:roubaixtuesday wrote:I go simply on his record and the people in his cabinet and in parliament.
I don't think there is the smallest smidgen of a chance of a "one nation" government. He is surrounded by hard right libertarian ideologues.
I predict much propaganda on "one nation ", investment and the like, together with a reality of a power grab constitutionally and continued austerity across the public sector compared to historical norms.
Oh, and continued "nudge nudge, wink wink" racism.
The cabinet you refer to is the old one. There will be a new one. He is now a lot less reliant on the likes of JRM to keep him in power and can, if he chooses, look for new cabinet faces with a more One Nation agenda. We will have to wait and see.
Boris's non-PC language and flippant remarks are a problem and I hope he has come to realise that. It shows an immature and unpleasant side, and it is also unprofessional. You see a high degree of genuine bigotry behind the words, and you may be right. On the other hand he may just be saying what seems funny to him and voicing a more superficial bigotry that does not go deep. Either way, he does need to get a grip on it.
windmiller wrote:pwa wrote:Philosophical question.
Why is it okay to refer to other human beings as "turkeys" but not okay to refer to other human beings as "pillar boxes"? Neither shows respect for other folk or for diversity of opinion.
I suppose calling a person a "gammon" which refers to skin colour is much worse and actually racist rather than derogatory. has the term "gammon" been used in such a way in this forum and if so why has it not been addressed as a racist slur?
windmiller wrote:pwa wrote:Philosophical question.
Why is it okay to refer to other human beings as "turkeys" but not okay to refer to other human beings as "pillar boxes"? Neither shows respect for other folk or for diversity of opinion.
I suppose calling a person a "gammon" which refers to skin colour is much worse and actually racist rather than derogatory. has the term "gammon" been used in such a way in this forum and if so why has it not been addressed as a racist slur?
pete75 wrote:
I've never met anyone who chants "four legs good, two legs bad. You must know some strange people if you have.
al_yrpal wrote:pete75 wrote:
I've never met anyone who chants "four legs good, two legs bad. You must know some strange people if you have.
You never read Animal Farm then? Or lived in a coalfield, or a real working class area? They don't chant that, but they never look at things objectively and just mindlessly chant endlessly repeated slogans! My pensions add up to much less than the average wage but they get supplemented by dividends from invested savings on which you pay little tax. Prudence finally pays off...
Al
Marcus Aurelius wrote:Well at least BoJo has a proper mandate to get stuff done, without interference from hand wringers. I’m not 100 percent comfortable with everything the Conservatives have planned, but it’s a lot better than what Labour had in mind.