Flying.. why? why not?

Use this board for general non-cycling-related chat, or to introduce yourself to the forum.
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 14165
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Location: Leafy suburbia

Flying.. why? why not?

Postby Cyril Haearn » 11 Feb 2020, 7:52pm

The UK government plans to financially help an airline that goes from London to Exeter + Newquay
British people fly far too much according to Molly Scott Cato, green MEP for sw England + Gibraltar, she has pledged not to fly at all in 2020

I think people should accept that Newquay is far from London
Entertainer, intellectual, idealist, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies

francovendee
Posts: 1525
Joined: 5 May 2009, 6:32am

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby francovendee » 11 Feb 2020, 8:17pm

I hate airports, not the flying.
Getting from France to the UK with one of the budget airlines can cost as little as 20 euros return.
Taking the car the ferry costs around 200 euros out of season for the car and two passengers.
I usually fly, it's cheaper and cuts out the 5 hour drive to the port.
I'm never sure which form of transport leaves the worse carbon footprint but at least the airline isn't being directly subsidised..

Bonefishblues
Posts: 8210
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby Bonefishblues » 11 Feb 2020, 8:33pm

It's a vital service to get to one's holiday home.

landsurfer
Posts: 5182
Joined: 27 Oct 2012, 9:13pm

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby landsurfer » 11 Feb 2020, 8:55pm

So ... Engineering meeting with CAF in Belfast;

Flying ..... Staff drive to EMA ... catch plane, £168 return, met at airport by customer, meeting, lunch, return to airport by customer, staff collection from airport. Total time 1 day.

Drive .....Drive to Dumfries in diesel vehicle (37 miles / gallon) .. night stop at Premier Inn. Next morning .. 0430hrs .. drive to Cairnrayan ... Ferry travel to Belfast ..£340 .... Meeting. Return ... to Sheffield. .. Total cost ... > £1000.

Now folks guess, which has the lowest carbon footprint / cost.

FLY ??
"There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph." Guess Who ...
The Road Goes On Forever

carpetcleaner
Posts: 920
Joined: 14 Nov 2019, 1:25pm

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby carpetcleaner » 11 Feb 2020, 9:07pm

francovendee wrote:I hate airports, not the flying.
Getting from France to the UK with one of the budget airlines can cost as little as 20 euros return.
Taking the car the ferry costs around 200 euros out of season for the car and two passengers.
I usually fly, it's cheaper and cuts out the 5 hour drive to the port.
I'm never sure which form of transport leaves the worse carbon footprint but at least the airline isn't being directly subsidised..


Air travel is effectively subsidised by the low or zero taxes applied to aeroplane fuel. If it was taxed like motor fuel flying would once again be only for the rich and airports would become elegant, luxury establishments made to cater for them.

peetee
Posts: 2335
Joined: 4 May 2010, 10:20pm
Location: Cornwall

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby peetee » 11 Feb 2020, 9:49pm

landsurfer wrote:So ... Engineering meeting with CAF in Belfast;

Flying ..... Staff drive to EMA ... catch plane, £168 return, met at airport by customer, meeting, lunch, return to airport by customer, staff collection from airport. Total time 1 day.

Drive .....Drive to Dumfries in diesel vehicle (37 miles / gallon) .. night stop at Premier Inn. Next morning .. 0430hrs .. drive to Cairnrayan ... Ferry travel to Belfast ..£340 .... Meeting. Return ... to Sheffield. .. Total cost ... > £1000.

Now folks guess, which has the lowest carbon footprint / cost.

FLY ??


What sort of diesel vehicle only does 37mpg? :shock:
Current status report:
Back on two wheels in deepest Pastyland and loving every minute. Mission: to enjoy big, bad hills again.

User avatar
Cugel
Posts: 3405
Joined: 13 Nov 2017, 11:14am

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby Cugel » 11 Feb 2020, 10:10pm

peetee wrote:
landsurfer wrote:So ... Engineering meeting with CAF in Belfast;

Flying ..... Staff drive to EMA ... catch plane, £168 return, met at airport by customer, meeting, lunch, return to airport by customer, staff collection from airport. Total time 1 day.

Drive .....Drive to Dumfries in diesel vehicle (37 miles / gallon) .. night stop at Premier Inn. Next morning .. 0430hrs .. drive to Cairnrayan ... Ferry travel to Belfast ..£340 .... Meeting. Return ... to Sheffield. .. Total cost ... > £1000.

Now folks guess, which has the lowest carbon footprint / cost.

FLY ??


What sort of diesel vehicle only does 37mpg? :shock:


A geet guzzling SUV with a teeny yet heavy-footed dasher in it. (Generally only one dasher). The roads are full of singleton dashers on a mission of no importance whatsoever. The skies also. But soon they will all be dead of weather. Mind, so will the rest of us.

Cugel

roubaixtuesday
Posts: 3277
Joined: 18 Aug 2015, 7:05pm

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby roubaixtuesday » 11 Feb 2020, 10:15pm

landsurfer wrote:So ... Engineering meeting with CAF in Belfast;

Flying ..... Staff drive to EMA ... catch plane, £168 return, met at airport by customer, meeting, lunch, return to airport by customer, staff collection from airport. Total time 1 day.

Drive .....Drive to Dumfries in diesel vehicle (37 miles / gallon) .. night stop at Premier Inn. Next morning .. 0430hrs .. drive to Cairnrayan ... Ferry travel to Belfast ..£340 .... Meeting. Return ... to Sheffield. .. Total cost ... > £1000.

Now folks guess, which has the lowest carbon footprint / cost.

FLY ??


Now folks guess, how long the earth's resources can support this?

iandriver
Posts: 2358
Joined: 10 Jun 2009, 2:09pm
Location: Cambridge.

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby iandriver » 11 Feb 2020, 10:22pm

As ever I feel the truth is usually somewhere in the middle. One foreign holiday a year perhaps. Treating planes like busses and doing 5 weekend breaks a year, probably ott.
Supporter of the A10 corridor cycling campaign serving Royston to Cambridge http://a10corridorcycle.com. Never knew gardening secateurs were an essential part of the on bike tool kit until I took up campaigning.....

100%JR
Posts: 1138
Joined: 31 May 2016, 10:47pm
Location: High Green,Sheffield.

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby 100%JR » 12 Feb 2020, 12:42am

peetee wrote:
landsurfer wrote:So ... Engineering meeting with CAF in Belfast;

Flying ..... Staff drive to EMA ... catch plane, £168 return, met at airport by customer, meeting, lunch, return to airport by customer, staff collection from airport. Total time 1 day.

Drive .....Drive to Dumfries in diesel vehicle (37 miles / gallon) .. night stop at Premier Inn. Next morning .. 0430hrs .. drive to Cairnrayan ... Ferry travel to Belfast ..£340 .... Meeting. Return ... to Sheffield. .. Total cost ... > £1000.

Now folks guess, which has the lowest carbon footprint / cost.

FLY ??


What sort of diesel vehicle only does 37mpg? :shock:

I would hazard a guess that in reality quite a few will struggle to achieve that!
My Insignia 2.0 Diesel does sub 30mpg just nipping to work etc.I doubt it would do much more than 35mpg on a run.It might Squeeze 40mpg on a run if I tickled it and drove at 60mph.

pwa
Posts: 12715
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby pwa » 12 Feb 2020, 6:03am

francovendee wrote:I hate airports, not the flying.
Getting from France to the UK with one of the budget airlines can cost as little as 20 euros return.
Taking the car the ferry costs around 200 euros out of season for the car and two passengers.
I usually fly, it's cheaper and cuts out the 5 hour drive to the port.
I'm never sure which form of transport leaves the worse carbon footprint but at least the airline isn't being directly subsidised..

That will be flying. I was listening yesterday to comparisons of flying, train and car in relation to HS2 and flying came out as shockingly bad as a way of getting from one UK city to another. It is easily possible to be a non-car-user and still have a higher carbon footprint from travelling than a regular car user who doesn't fly. I can see why folk fly between UK cities to save on cost, but it does make me wonder why I bother trying to reduce my own carbon footprint when others care so little.

Just for a flavour of the problem of flying:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... -in-a-year

Comparison figures for modes of transport are complex and influenced by seat occupancy, but planes come out poorly. Trains and buses do well, with cars somewhere in between. And best of all is not travelling, or travelling by human power.

landsurfer
Posts: 5182
Joined: 27 Oct 2012, 9:13pm

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby landsurfer » 12 Feb 2020, 6:59am

peetee wrote:What sort of diesel vehicle only does 37mpg? :shock:

I would hazard a guess that in reality quite a few will struggle to achieve that!
My Insignia 2.0 Diesel does sub 30mpg just nipping to work etc.I doubt it would do much more than 35mpg on a run.It might Squeeze 40mpg on a run if I tickled it and drove at 60mph.[/quote]

+1 ... I prefer to use reality milage rather than fantasy milage quoted by vehicle manufactures and those seeking to justify their "green" vehicles.
Which don't actually exist of course.
On my last driven business trip to Belfast i took all 4 children and my wife, 4 Class 3200 hydrostatic hose kits and 4 sets of pumps and motors. Annual family visit and business all in one.
"There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph." Guess Who ...
The Road Goes On Forever

reohn2
Posts: 39825
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby reohn2 » 12 Feb 2020, 8:51am

landsurfer wrote: ... I prefer to use reality milage rather than fantasy milage quoted by vehicle manufactures and those seeking to justify their "green" vehicles. ....

My 10 year old Ford C max 2.0ltr diesel has returned between 50 and 55 mpg regularly over the 5 years I've owned it,mainly motorway miles @ 70/75mph.
I'm expecting the new(to me)S max maybe slightly less but it's a bigger and heavier car.

EDIT,before the current C max I had another 1.8ltre petrol C max which returned a regular 37 to 40 mpg over the 4 years owned.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I cycle therefore I am.

hamster
Posts: 3579
Joined: 2 Feb 2007, 12:42pm

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby hamster » 12 Feb 2020, 9:13am

100%JR wrote:My Insignia 2.0 Diesel does sub 30mpg just nipping to work etc.I doubt it would do much more than 35mpg on a run.It might Squeeze 40mpg on a run if I tickled it and drove at 60mph.


That's incredibly poor.

My 2013 C220 CDi Mercedes estate does 58mpg on a motorway (real figures, not paper), long term average over everything 47mpg.

It gets Tunap injector cleaner into it every year, it always kicks the mpg up by 2mpg or so. It's around £15 a bottle.

Oldjohnw
Posts: 4908
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 4:23am
Location: Northumberland

Re: Flying.. why? why not?

Postby Oldjohnw » 12 Feb 2020, 9:25am

My VW Golf gets 55-65 and 75+ on long journeys. I don't speed but on motorways I don't dawdle either.
John