The utility cyclist wrote:Then we have people on here and elsewhere saying the lock down is the reason for fewer deaths on one hand but saying there's a huge spike of deaths on the other, it can't be both can it?
It is entirely possible both that there has been a huge spike in deaths (there has), and that there would have been far more without social distancing (there would)
The rest of your conspiratorial rant shames cycling uk through allowing their forum to promote it.
I think comments like yours shame Cycling UK by allowing it to promote ignorance of science/facts. But yeah, people like yourself on here don't like opinion if it doesn't match yours, deride it saying it's a conspiracy rant and say it should not be allowed, gotcha.
For one it's not a rant, it's describing exactly what the government and their 'experts' have done, how ONS are representing the deaths precisely as they have done, have you even bothered to look at the release from Thursday for the week 10/4/20? It's describing precisely how WHO have ignored bias data, we know this is true, it describes how WHO take money from big pharmaceutical companies, this is also true, including the monies they try to hide through back door methods. Far from a "rant" every aspect is true, you just chose not to check out the facts or ignore the facts because like many, like Whittey, Vallance (SmithKlineGlaxo employee) they cannot backtrack because you'll look worse than a plum, for them it's a career killer to backtrack and admit their error, same as for WHO, Trump is right in terms of investigating WHO but not for all the right reasons, just as he was correct about herd immunity but again it was to go against the grain rather than him knowing why.
And if you'd read what the forum moderators said a few weeks back, they said they would delete if posters were deliberately saying you should break the new oppressive 'laws', despite the fact that that has been done on here many times previous with regards to contesting and stating UK law is wrong/discriminatory or lacking evidence to make such a law in the first instance - similar to the cycle helmet 'laws' in some places that is costing lives directly and indirectly.
So despite your little attack, hard lines chum, it's staying if the mods actually stick to their word