The utility cyclist wrote:... and the government have also (though not openly) admitted to no isolated new virus as per a FOI request?
That's a secret response to an FoI request? I've never seen of those before. You've clearly got a copy. Please could you post it in full.
for you Jonathan
Why don't you look it up for yourself, it's already widely available online. I've already attached a photo on here previously in the other thread of the admittance of CDC stating no isolation.
As for the sensitivity of the test, again, a search engine is your friend, even Boris Johnson admitted to how flawed the PCR test is, PHE stated that the false positive rate median is 2.3% as high as 4.5%, the lowest figure is 0.8%. You do understand what that actually means right? You understand how dead organic matter triggers a positive, that could be the common cold (which corona viruses cause) you understand how amplifying 45x as the UK currently does has a huge impact on how the test results come out?
Have a read of this, I've linked to it before but you're not interested in real science/numbers like the government so pointless really. https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/cov ... aningless/
So many world leading scientists have stated that RT-PCR is not fit for purpose time and time again, that there has never being a gold standard test. If you look at the notes from CDC meeting they even state that the 'virus' was modelled using a computer algorithm.
You're a typical conspiracy theorist. I hope you get a vaccine to protect you then you'll be completely safe from those of us living in the real world