BTW, apparently half of us are deficient in vitamin D (see here) - how do we know and what do we do about it? (I've never quite got over a work colleague telling me I ought to shine a torch on bare skin behind my knees one winter...

Pebble wrote:pwa wrote:Pebble wrote:Is there really vast amounts of malnourished children out there ? the ones I see seem mostly over-fed, even considerably over-fed. Or is it they have been over-fed on take-aways and crisps and even though they are over weight they are malnourished on good foods?
There genuinely are families where each day decisions are made about who will eat and which meals will be missed. There are parents who miss meals they need so that the kids can eat. Food banks reduce the problem, but it doesn't feel to me to be good that in the UK in the 21st century there are families reliant on charity for their food. But it is better that the charities plug the gap if our society isn't willing or able to fix it properly.
It is just I do not see malnourished people in the Newcastle / Sunderland area which are areas that are far from being well-off. And just wondered if you could be malnourished and over-weight at the same time. I'm always wary of what the media tell me.
Jdsk wrote:Vitamin D: Current NHS advice:
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vitamins-and-minerals/vitamin-d/
That's oral supplementation in winter.
I'd guess that advice will be all year round in the not too distant future as we learn more about the effects of mild deficiency.
Previous discussions:
https://forum.cyclinguk.org/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=138578&hilit=vitamin+jonathan#p1497939
https://forum.cyclinguk.org/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=138578&p=1498797&hilit=vitamin+jonathan#p1498337
Jonathan
Vorpal wrote:Jdsk wrote:Vitamin D: Current NHS advice:
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vitamins-and-minerals/vitamin-d/
That's oral supplementation in winter.
I'd guess that advice will be all year round in the not too distant future as we learn more about the effects of mild deficiency.
Although Norway is further north than most of the UK, and people tend to be outside more (so theoretically should get more natural vitamin D, at least in summer) vitamin D supplementation is recommended year round. I believe it is in Denmark, as well.
reohn2 wrote:Marcus Rashford began his hi-lighting of the plight of poor families children because he's been there and seen it first hand in his own upbringing.
Jdsk wrote:reohn2 wrote:Marcus Rashford began his hi-lighting of the plight of poor families children because he's been there and seen it first hand in his own upbringing.
That's a very impressive piece of campaigning.
IFS analysis:
"No free lunch? Some pros and cons of holiday free school meals"
https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15148
Jonathan
......As of January 2020, 1.4 million pupils – about one-in-six – were eligible for means-tested free meals, bringing the total yearly cost to around £600 million.....
reohn2 wrote:Jdsk wrote:reohn2 wrote:Marcus Rashford began his hi-lighting of the plight of poor families children because he's been there and seen it first hand in his own upbringing.
That's a very impressive piece of campaigning.
IFS analysis:
"No free lunch? Some pros and cons of holiday free school meals"
https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15148
Jonathan
What troubles me is that in the 5th or is it the 6th(?)richest country in the world with a pre covid19 low unemployment level:-......As of January 2020, 1.4 million pupils – about one-in-six – were eligible for means-tested free meals, bringing the total yearly cost to around £600 million.....
What is so wrong with a rich society that parents can't afford to feed their children?
mercalia wrote:reohn2 wrote:Jdsk wrote:That's a very impressive piece of campaigning.
IFS analysis:
"No free lunch? Some pros and cons of holiday free school meals"
https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15148
Jonathan
What troubles me is that in the 5th or is it the 6th(?)richest country in the world with a pre covid19 low unemployment level:-......As of January 2020, 1.4 million pupils – about one-in-six – were eligible for means-tested free meals, bringing the total yearly cost to around £600 million.....
What is so wrong with a rich society that parents can't afford to feed their children?
why do you keep on peddling that old mistaken idea of the "rich country". The Uk state has barely enough money to deal with things most of the riches are either in private hands or locked up in property values
Jdsk wrote:Vorpal wrote:Jdsk wrote:Vitamin D: Current NHS advice:
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vitamins-and-minerals/vitamin-d/
That's oral supplementation in winter.
I'd guess that advice will be all year round in the not too distant future as we learn more about the effects of mild deficiency.
Although Norway is further north than most of the UK, and people tend to be outside more (so theoretically should get more natural vitamin D, at least in summer) vitamin D supplementation is recommended year round. I believe it is in Denmark, as well.
The evidence and discussion is very similar in different countries. There's a fair (!) bit of disagreement in whether the risk of deficiency is better met by oral supplementation at the individual level or by fortification of food. But that involves political issues as well as biochemistry.
Jdsk wrote:Jdsk wrote:Vorpal wrote:Although Norway is further north than most of the UK, and people tend to be outside more (so theoretically should get more natural vitamin D, at least in summer) vitamin D supplementation is recommended year round. I believe it is in Denmark, as well.
The evidence and discussion is very similar in different countries. There's a fair (!) bit of disagreement in whether the risk of deficiency is better met by oral supplementation at the individual level or by fortification of food. But that involves political issues as well as biochemistry.
Sounds as if there's some imminent initiative: (My emphasis)
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/14/covid-uk-government-requests-guidance-on-vitamin-d-use
... People who are able to buy a Vitamin D supplement and start taking them now, ahead of a free delivery, are advised to do so.
Jdsk wrote:Tangled Metal wrote:What's your general approach as what I assume is a medical professional? In my position would you follow restriction boundaries based on actual infection rates in other areas or would you take the advisory wording as a get out to allow a more commonsense personal approach of sticking to areas with similar infection rates irrespective of government imposed tiers?
I think that you're putting too much emphasis on areas with lower or higher rates and the boundaries between them.
My personal approach is to get my volume and closeness and nature of contacts way below the guidance, let alone the law. The lower the better.
Jonathan