Jdsk wrote:Cowsham wrote:Again c19 is not a flu it's DNA is very similar to the common cold.
Coronaviruses are RNA viruses not DNA viruses.
Jonathan
You are right pardon my limited medical knowledge -- but the gist of what I said is still correct it's a long chain RNA which is different from a flu.
This is where I got this information and had it confirmed by my sons consultant after researching it myself for the purpose of eliminating the possibility he had cv19 last November. Yes they wouldn't have known what cv19 was last Nov in NI but the evidence stacked up in favor of a flu as the cause of his near fatal illness.
It was too early for a start then there's the fact that 80% of people are not immune so I and all the nurses would have had a high chance of contracting it. I was by his side 24/7 for a week in icu, hence I picked up on one of the early statistics about how many people would be actually immune. ( I'll try to find the source of this info but I'm sure I heard it on tv ) Then there's the fact that the doctors said they found an H1N1 flu on the swab.
https://www.labnews.co.uk/article/20305 ... ype-of-fluVirology
Both influenza and coronaviruses have a single strand of RNA as their genome, but that is where the genomic similarity ends. The influenza virus genome comprises 7 or 8 segments, while the coronavirus has one long strand. Influenza virus RNA is what is known as ‘negative sense RNA’. This means that its sequence is the mirror image of the correct code for proteins and a complementary strand must be made from it before production of new viruses within a host cell can proceed. In contrast, the coronavirus genome is ‘positive sense’ which means it can act as messenger RNA and code for proteins. So from a virological point of view, coronavirus is
definitely not a type of flu.
I am here. Where are you?