There is a huge moral duty to try to reach those who are vaccine hesitant/resistant and ensure that they have good accurate information about the benefits and about the risks, so that they can make an informed decision. It will appropriate to do that using different formats, because different people will be receptive to different sources, whether that be GPs, politicians, community leaders, religious leaders, media outlets etc. The fact that some of those approaches might put some people's backs up and make them determined to refuse the vaccine is something that probably cannot be avoided: it's not possible to tailor the message for every person individually. If someone decides not have the vaccine for reasons not supported by the medical science, they have to accept the responsibility for that themselves (not say childishly that it's the fault of the GP [or whoever], because they didn't like the manner in which the GP communicated the message to them).
However there are millions who do want the vaccine and can take the place in the queue of those who refuse the vaccine, and the bigger priority must be getting as many people vaccinated as soon as possible, not least teenagers and the young who have had their schooling, employment prospects and lives so disrupted.
But oh the irony of a government composed of politcians who embraced outright lying to achieve their aims and power, and a prime minister who is proud of his ability to get away with lying, now asking people to trust them about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. And even more ironic, the people who voted for them and should be more likely to trust them, are instead much more likely to be vaccine hesitant.
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/health/arti ... K_apr_2021