Thanks. After I'd posted I came to the same conclusion myself.
Covid Booster. Yes/No? *** The Covid Thread ***
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
Consultant Appt this morning, and then a jab.
Ended up being really easy once I actually got to a vaccination centre - getting that far was a journey though.
Ended up being really easy once I actually got to a vaccination centre - getting that far was a journey though.
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 17 Jan 2011, 1:07pm
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
I've read many scholarly articles (and spoken to every doctor I know) to understand why with every jab (flu, COVID, whatever) my wife has a sore arm for a day and I have three days of full-on flu symptoms.
I now have the answer; my immune reaction is apparently a bit extreme.
And the reason for this?
Well to quote both the scholarly articles and my doctor friends (as well as Patrick Moore) "We just don't know"
I now have the answer; my immune reaction is apparently a bit extreme.
And the reason for this?
Well to quote both the scholarly articles and my doctor friends (as well as Patrick Moore) "We just don't know"
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
There just aren't many studies of the between-individual variation, and "different immune reaction" is more of a rewording than an explanation... unless it's supported by something other than what has to be explained. But it's now possible to measure T cell function and markers of immune pathway activation more easily and cheaply than ever before and that could well produce genuine answers explaining the variation.Stradageek wrote: ↑23 Nov 2021, 8:28am I've read many scholarly articles (and spoken to every doctor I know) to understand why with every jab (flu, COVID, whatever) my wife has a sore arm for a day and I have three days of full-on flu symptoms.
I now have the answer; my immune reaction is apparently a bit extreme.
And the reason for this?
Well to quote both the scholarly articles and my doctor friends (as well as Patrick Moore) "We just don't know"
Jonathan
PS: Effects on immune function often come up in these forums in discussions of both nutrition and exercise but they tend not to have much in common with the way that clinical immunologists discuss immune function.
- ncutler
- Moderator
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 5:29pm
- Location: Forest of Bowland Lancashire
- Contact:
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
To temporarily return to the original topic of this thread:
Article in today's Graun: Covid patients in ICU now almost all unvaccinated, says Oxford scientist
Prof Sir Andrew Pollard says most of those infected who are fully vaccinated will experience only mild symptoms
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... -scientist
And incidentally, I had a booster and a 'flu jab together about 4 weeks ago. Neither were the slightest problem apart from a very mild soreness at the injection sites, and if anything the 'flu was a tiny bit more irritating.
Article in today's Graun: Covid patients in ICU now almost all unvaccinated, says Oxford scientist
Prof Sir Andrew Pollard says most of those infected who are fully vaccinated will experience only mild symptoms
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... -scientist
And incidentally, I had a booster and a 'flu jab together about 4 weeks ago. Neither were the slightest problem apart from a very mild soreness at the injection sites, and if anything the 'flu was a tiny bit more irritating.
No pasaran
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
Actually, the original topic of the thread was whether, rather than being used for booster shots, it would be more effective to use the same shots to support overseas programmes in order to reduce the risks of other variants arising. But as usual it veered off course...
...and yes, having had my booster and flu shot over the same weekend, the biggest impact was a tender spot interfering with sleep.
...and yes, having had my booster and flu shot over the same weekend, the biggest impact was a tender spot interfering with sleep.
-
- Posts: 36781
- Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
I've a sneaky suspicion that just having a needle stuck in your arm without an injection would often result in a sore arm at the site of the puncture
That's apart from the sight of the needle :wink:
That's apart from the sight of the needle :wink:
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
Does anyone know how those overseas programmes are going? I've seen more about the PM's Peppa Pig speech than that recently, despite not looking for it.sizbut wrote: ↑23 Nov 2021, 11:17am Actually, the original topic of the thread was whether, rather than being used for booster shots, it would be more effective to use the same shots to support overseas programmes in order to reduce the risks of other variants arising. But as usual it veered off course...
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
Yes but do we really think that the government that ordered doses destroyed rather than using them to vaccinate the workers in the vaccination centres would actually keep their promises to overseas aid?sizbut wrote: ↑23 Nov 2021, 11:17am Actually, the original topic of the thread was whether, rather than being used for booster shots, it would be more effective to use the same shots to support overseas programmes in order to reduce the risks of other variants arising. But as usual it veered off course...
...and yes, having had my booster and flu shot over the same weekend, the biggest impact was a tender spot interfering with sleep.
"The BMA has said it is continuing to hear reports of CCGs ‘demanding that vaccines are thrown away’ rather than being given as second doses or to ‘other cohorts’." (This was early in the rollout)...
Apparently we had, after committing to supply 100 million doses overseas (a pitiful amount really), done nothing until at least July this year.
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
- ncutler
- Moderator
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 5:29pm
- Location: Forest of Bowland Lancashire
- Contact:
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
I expect everyone will enjoy reading:
Four psychology scholars have developed a four-page consumer guide to spotting COVID-19 conspiracies. [Lewandowsky S, and others. How to spot COVID-19 conspiracy theories. https://www.climatechangecommunication. ... eories.pdf ] It describes these seven traits of conspiratorial thinking, each with a COVID-19-related example:
Contradictory logic
Overriding suspicion
Nefarious intent
Something must be wrong
Persecuted victim
Immune to evidence
Re-interpreting randomness
Four psychology scholars have developed a four-page consumer guide to spotting COVID-19 conspiracies. [Lewandowsky S, and others. How to spot COVID-19 conspiracy theories. https://www.climatechangecommunication. ... eories.pdf ] It describes these seven traits of conspiratorial thinking, each with a COVID-19-related example:
Contradictory logic
Overriding suspicion
Nefarious intent
Something must be wrong
Persecuted victim
Immune to evidence
Re-interpreting randomness
No pasaran
- simonineaston
- Posts: 8077
- Joined: 9 May 2007, 1:06pm
- Location: ...at a cricket ground
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
A chum who works for the NHS as a computer programmer and who thinks with Spock-like logic, suggested that those who choose not to avail themselves of the C19 vaccination programme should be treated just like everybody else should they fall ill, but should be charged for their treatment... I pointed out that a lengthy stay in an ICU could turn out v. dear, but he countered by remarking that since the UK is already a credit-rich economy, he could see no reason why the cost of treatment couldn't be the subject of easy, convenient terms, just like, say, leasing a Merc..
S
(on the look out for Armageddon, on board a Brompton nano & ever-changing Moultons)
(on the look out for Armageddon, on board a Brompton nano & ever-changing Moultons)
-
- Posts: 11043
- Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
- Location: Near Bicester Oxon
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
...or obtaining a degree.simonineaston wrote: ↑24 Nov 2021, 11:02am A chum who works for the NHS as a computer programmer and who thinks with Spock-like logic, suggested that those who choose not to avail themselves of the C19 vaccination programme should be treated just like everybody else should they fall ill, but should be charged for their treatment... I pointed out that a lengthy stay in an ICU could turn out v. dear, but he countered by remarking that since the UK is already a credit-rich economy, he could see no reason why the cost of treatment couldn't be the subject of easy, convenient terms, just like, say, leasing a Merc..
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
It has been well publicised that the NHS is under great strain and many workers are burnt out or close to it, with increasing shortages of staff in some sectors, and that there is a huge backlog of treatments. What I have not seen is any attempt to quantify the impact of the diversion of NHS resources to Covid away from other treatments, especially those which require an ICU bed, on the mortality of those with other conditions, e.g. cancer. There was the odd human interest article in the media over the past two years in which some cancer patients described how treatment was stopped/delayed, which suggested to me that the reduction in levels of care would result in a significant number of deaths, i.e. statistically measurable.
If that is the case, I would argue that the decision to continue to prioritise Covid patients for ICU beds (because their need is immediate and acute) over cancer patients (whose need for treatment is not so immediate and acute), needs to be reviewed. Although the Covid patient's need is more immediate when viewed in isolation, in many cases the cancer patient's need will be just as great or greater. The fact that the cancer patient's prospects will not deteriorate if their treatment is delayed another month, or two or six, is a red herring if the continuing resource pressures mean that in another month, or two or six, yet more Covid patients with immediate acute need will necessitate delaying the cancer patient's treatment yet again. In other words, the need of patients with chronic life threatening conditions is as important of those with acute immediate life threatening conditions, and the former group should not be sacrificed for the latter group. That is especially the case now that vaccines have been available for many months, with the result that the vast majority of those in ICU beds with Covid are unvaccinated.
I've not yet seen any statements by oncologists or other medical specialists that the shortage of ICU beds and demands on other NHS resources by Covid patients is seriously harming their patients, but if that is the case, then arguably a cap should be placed on the number of ICU beds available for treatment of unvaccinated Covid patients (excluding various groups such as children, adolescents, those who cannot be vaccinated etc.). That should allow ordinary treatments requiring ICU beds to resume at more normal, pre-pandemic levels.
If that is the case, I would argue that the decision to continue to prioritise Covid patients for ICU beds (because their need is immediate and acute) over cancer patients (whose need for treatment is not so immediate and acute), needs to be reviewed. Although the Covid patient's need is more immediate when viewed in isolation, in many cases the cancer patient's need will be just as great or greater. The fact that the cancer patient's prospects will not deteriorate if their treatment is delayed another month, or two or six, is a red herring if the continuing resource pressures mean that in another month, or two or six, yet more Covid patients with immediate acute need will necessitate delaying the cancer patient's treatment yet again. In other words, the need of patients with chronic life threatening conditions is as important of those with acute immediate life threatening conditions, and the former group should not be sacrificed for the latter group. That is especially the case now that vaccines have been available for many months, with the result that the vast majority of those in ICU beds with Covid are unvaccinated.
I've not yet seen any statements by oncologists or other medical specialists that the shortage of ICU beds and demands on other NHS resources by Covid patients is seriously harming their patients, but if that is the case, then arguably a cap should be placed on the number of ICU beds available for treatment of unvaccinated Covid patients (excluding various groups such as children, adolescents, those who cannot be vaccinated etc.). That should allow ordinary treatments requiring ICU beds to resume at more normal, pre-pandemic levels.
-
- Posts: 36781
- Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
It's not restricted to intensive care, although that's obviously resource-intensive. eg I saw something recently that reported an increase in post mortems on decomposed bodies - suggesting an increase in people who had died "home alone," and remained undiscovered.
I presume that the data on excess deaths, when used in conjunction with data on covid-related deaths gives some information, although the different time scales for different illnesses must affect that and will do so for years to come.
When Boris Johnson is replaced, his successor from whichever party, will have good reason to expedite the public inquiry.
I presume that the data on excess deaths, when used in conjunction with data on covid-related deaths gives some information, although the different time scales for different illnesses must affect that and will do so for years to come.
When Boris Johnson is replaced, his successor from whichever party, will have good reason to expedite the public inquiry.
Re: Covid Booster. Yes/No?
Thanks for posting this. I don't know of that data in oncology and I'll see what's available.slowster wrote: ↑24 Nov 2021, 11:49am It has been well publicised that the NHS is under great strain and many workers are burnt out or close to it, with increasing shortages of staff in some sectors, and that there is a huge backlog of treatments. What I have not seen is any attempt to quantify the impact of the diversion of NHS resources to Covid away from other treatments, especially those which require an ICU bed, on the mortality of those with other conditions, e.g. cancer. There was the odd human interest article in the media over the past two years in which some cancer patients described how treatment was stopped/delayed, which suggested to me that the reduction in levels of care would result in a significant number of deaths, i.e. statistically measurable.
If that is the case, I would argue that the decision to continue to prioritise Covid patients for ICU beds (because their need is immediate and acute) over cancer patients (whose need for treatment is not so immediate and acute), needs to be reviewed. Although the Covid patient's need is more immediate when viewed in isolation, in many cases the cancer patient's need will be just as great or greater. The fact that the cancer patient's prospects will not deteriorate if their treatment is delayed another month, or two or six, is a red herring if the continuing resource pressures mean that in another month, or two or six, yet more Covid patients with immediate acute need will necessitate delaying the cancer patient's treatment yet again. In other words, the need of patients with chronic life threatening conditions is as important of those with acute immediate life threatening conditions, and the former group should not be sacrificed for the latter group. That is especially the case now that vaccines have been available for many months, with the result that the vast majority of those in ICU beds with Covid are unvaccinated.
I've not yet seen any statements by oncologists or other medical specialists that the shortage of ICU beds and demands on other NHS resources by Covid patients is seriously harming their patients, but if that is the case, then arguably a cap should be placed on the number of ICU beds available for treatment of unvaccinated Covid patients (excluding various groups such as children, adolescents, those who cannot be vaccinated etc.). That should allow ordinary treatments requiring ICU beds to resume at more normal, pre-pandemic levels.
On the issue of the choice whether to have been vaccinated or not should be taken into account in allocation of resources... most ethical codes in healthcare say that it shouldn't... you try to do the best for the patient in front of you (as with smoking). But of course that means that accidents of logistics and perceived urgency rather than cost-effectiveness may end up determining who gets the resources.
Of course for elective care the disruption has been massive. What has often been misrepresented in that discussion is the concept of "recovery" after the outbreak. Waiting lists and waiting times in the UK were at record levels and increasing rapidly before COVID-19 existed. And "recovering" to that state would be totally inadequate to address the need.
Jonathan