Are you suggesting that meanings are only defined by headlines?
More policing by social media
Re: More policing by social media
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
-
- Posts: 36781
- Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm
Re: More policing by social media
The headline described this as a "horror smash."
One of the early replies is here: (with my apologies for quoting it a second time.)
To be fair to Hellhound, his interpretation is now the accepted official analysis, and if anybody doubts this the apparent police response confirms he is correct. They even made a joke about it.
One of the early replies is here: (with my apologies for quoting it a second time.)
Now, it certainly was an "accident" in terms of the Road Traffic Act etc but the rest of that implies the "only an accident" sense which upsets some campaigners.
To be fair to Hellhound, his interpretation is now the accepted official analysis, and if anybody doubts this the apparent police response confirms he is correct. They even made a joke about it.
Re: More policing by social media
DONT PANIC! Penguins doesn't mean what you think. Not any more.
Re: More policing by social media
I don't drive a van.I drive a car and have never had an accident nor been close to having an accident.cycle tramp wrote: ↑2 Dec 2021, 9:58pmI would, unless you're driving your van, in which case I might do some gardening or something - because if you can't understand risk, or that something may happen to affect another road user causing them to react in a way you may not expect, then I really don't want to be sharing road space with you.
Before making assumptions maybe you should politely ask before hand
Wow,common sense prevails!!thirdcrank wrote: ↑5 Dec 2021, 9:38pm The headline described this as a "horror smash."
One of the early replies is here: (with my apologies for quoting it a second time.)Now, it certainly was an "accident" in terms of the Road Traffic Act etc but the rest of that implies the "only an accident" sense which upsets some campaigners.
To be fair to Hellhound, his interpretation is now the accepted official analysis, and if anybody doubts this the apparent police response confirms he is correct. They even made a joke about it.
-
- Posts: 3572
- Joined: 5 Aug 2009, 7:22pm
Re: More policing by social media
In which case, fair play to you, and please accept my apologies.Hellhound wrote: ↑6 Dec 2021, 5:57pmI don't drive a van.I drive a car and have never had an accident nor been close to having an accident.cycle tramp wrote: ↑2 Dec 2021, 9:58pmI would, unless you're driving your van, in which case I might do some gardening or something - because if you can't understand risk, or that something may happen to affect another road user causing them to react in a way you may not expect, then I really don't want to be sharing road space with you.
Before making assumptions maybe you should politely ask before hand
Wow,common sense prevails!!thirdcrank wrote: ↑5 Dec 2021, 9:38pm The headline described this as a "horror smash."
One of the early replies is here: (with my apologies for quoting it a second time.)Now, it certainly was an "accident" in terms of the Road Traffic Act etc but the rest of that implies the "only an accident" sense which upsets some campaigners.
To be fair to Hellhound, his interpretation is now the accepted official analysis, and if anybody doubts this the apparent police response confirms he is correct. They even made a joke about it.
I've caused two collisions so far, the first when I left a t junction on my motorcycle without properly checking the t junction was clear and was hit by a transit, which bounced me and my motorcycle down the road. It kinda hurt, alot.
And the second was gently rear ending a car... I was second in the queue, waiting to enter a roundabout, tge first car hand pulled away, I checked that the roundabout was clear, but had failed to check the car in front had moved forward. For some reason it hadn't and I drove into it.
Neither collision I would call an accident- whilst it was something I never intended, both could have been avoided if I was paying more attention.
Last edited by cycle tramp on 6 Dec 2021, 9:44pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3572
- Joined: 5 Aug 2009, 7:22pm
Re: More policing by social media
My issue, having caused road collisions in the past is that if you don't own them, you won't learn from them. If some calls a road collision an accident then there is less responsibility on the driver to own it, and learn from it.
Which is scary. The thing that scares me the most is that if I'd been driving a van, and the other party had been riding a motorcycle then I would have wiped him out. I could have killed someone.
It's possibly the reason why I now take road safety perhaps with more gravity than others. Road collisions not only ruin the lives of the victims but can ruin the lives of everyone involved. Had i have killed someone, I'm not sure if I could have mentally survived.
My last collision happened on a roundabout. I was driving in the outside lane and a Mercedes in the inside lane suddenly pulled across and our front wings collided. Had I been on a motorcycle or a bicycle it probably would have been more serious. The other driver apologised profusely, and as there was only some paint work damage we left it as that.
The driver was kind enough to explain that the reason they'd left their lane was for one spilt second they thought they was on the next roundabout about half a mile down the road, and before they could control it, their instinct and habit kicked in and they suddenly pulled of left to reach their exit lane - which kinda shows that collisions can happen for all types of reasons.
Which is scary. The thing that scares me the most is that if I'd been driving a van, and the other party had been riding a motorcycle then I would have wiped him out. I could have killed someone.
It's possibly the reason why I now take road safety perhaps with more gravity than others. Road collisions not only ruin the lives of the victims but can ruin the lives of everyone involved. Had i have killed someone, I'm not sure if I could have mentally survived.
My last collision happened on a roundabout. I was driving in the outside lane and a Mercedes in the inside lane suddenly pulled across and our front wings collided. Had I been on a motorcycle or a bicycle it probably would have been more serious. The other driver apologised profusely, and as there was only some paint work damage we left it as that.
The driver was kind enough to explain that the reason they'd left their lane was for one spilt second they thought they was on the next roundabout about half a mile down the road, and before they could control it, their instinct and habit kicked in and they suddenly pulled of left to reach their exit lane - which kinda shows that collisions can happen for all types of reasons.
Last edited by cycle tramp on 6 Dec 2021, 10:25pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: More policing by social media
Thanks for the honesty. And that's precisely the point.cycle tramp wrote: ↑6 Dec 2021, 7:25pmNeither collision I would call an accident- whilst it was something I never intended, both could have been avoided if I was paying more attention.
Jonathan
Re: More policing by social media
As a young inexperienced driver, I crashed at speed on ice. Car written off, me in hospital for 9 weeks.
It was an accident, but an avoidable one.
Yes, I learned from it.
It was an accident, but an avoidable one.
Yes, I learned from it.
Re: More policing by social media
Only really in the context of a motor crash though. I don't think anyone is disputing that it's not well used or understood, the point is it's only used in this sense for motor crashes and so the older, more general blameless sense of the word bleeds over.
Indeed it quite possibly became the common word for motor collisions due to societies relaxed approach to road safety.
The contents of this post, unless otherwise stated, are opinions of the author and may actually be complete codswallop
Re: More policing by social media
No - common sense has not prevailed.Hellhound wrote: ↑6 Dec 2021, 5:57pmWow,common sense prevails!!Now, it certainly was an "accident" in terms of the Road Traffic Act etc but the rest of that implies the "only an accident" sense which upsets some campaigners.
To be fair to Hellhound, his interpretation is now the accepted official analysis, and if anybody doubts this the apparent police response confirms he is correct. They even made a joke about it.
It wasn't an accident except in the sense that that word is used in the legislation.
It was an entirely foreseeable and preventable collision caused entirely by the poor driving of one, very lucky, motorist.
It would have been no more or less an accident if there had been another road user in between them and they had been killed.
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
Re: More policing by social media
The word accident has been used heavily in media precisely because it avoids placing responsibility on anyone. However, this has led to also avoiding any terms that imply agency by motorists.
As a result, there have, in recent years, been some effort to change this
https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonrei ... uidelines/
https://pressgazette.co.uk/new-guidelin ... -accident/
https://www.comminit.com/content/report ... ournalists
As a result, there have, in recent years, been some effort to change this
https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonrei ... uidelines/
https://pressgazette.co.uk/new-guidelin ... -accident/
https://www.comminit.com/content/report ... ournalists
“In some ways, it is easier to be a dissident, for then one is without responsibility.”
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
Re: More policing by social media
It would be just as correct to write:
It was an entirely foreseeable and preventable accident caused entirely by the poor driving of one, very lucky, motorist.
Re: More policing by social media
As a general rule, safety professionals do not consider something that is foreseeable & preventable to be an accident, and generally either refer to the outcome (injury, near miss, etc.) or use incident instead.
“In some ways, it is easier to be a dissident, for then one is without responsibility.”
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
Re: More policing by social media
I'm afraid you're mind-reading there!Vorpal wrote: ↑7 Dec 2021, 3:08pmAs a general rule, safety professionals do not consider something that is foreseeable & preventable to be an accident, and generally either refer to the outcome (injury, near miss, etc.) or use incident instead.
It may be their common practice to avoid the word in their reports, stats etc - and I would agree, based on the parts of my job that impinge on that world - but that doesn't mean they do not understand what an accident is, in the same terms as the general public.
After all, how many injuries in the workplace are not preventable in some way? It's a ridiculous concept.
Re: More policing by social media
If I walked around this place with an exposed sharp knife-blade in the course of a normal task; then tripped and stabbed a colleague; and someone shortly after asked if it was an accident, no-one would say "That was no accident!"
UNLESS they believed I did it deliberately.
UNLESS they believed I did it deliberately.