meic wrote:jezer wrote:McVouty wrote:The use of 'less' when 'fewer' is meant. If you can count them, it's 'fewer', so - Less sand, but fewer grains of sand.
Confusion about plurals - 'Blankshire Council are in favour of virtue and against sin'. No it aren't; its officers and (possibly but I doubt it) its members are, but the organisation is.
The use of the American term 'Regular' for 'Ordinary' or 'Small'.
Definitely incorrect use of plurals. Even the BBC says "
the Government ARE planning......"
Also call centres, especially a certain bank called Ll.... owned mainly by the taxpayer.
Oh, and dentists, I have an appointment in an hour
Does this in any way reduce the effectiveness of communication?
They may visualise
the government as a collection of people rather than as a single entity.
In Welsh we do the opposite, so the Government would be unarguably singular as would
the children. So the BBC's mistake neither defies logic nor impedes communication, it just breaches a convention.
A convention which a minority is trying to desperately uphold against the masses.
Language is not always logical; its use is coloured by thought patterns. Indeed, it's oft stated that one of the tragedies of losing a language is losing a particular way of thinking. People use plural verbs after words like "government" because the word does refer to more than one person - the very essence of plurality.
[tangent]
The Welsh use of singular third person verb forms with plural noun subjects is interesting though; Cornish uses them with any subject, including pronouns, although in these cases the verb follows the subject ("abnormal word order", the norm in Cornish and Breton (guess which language the people who gave it that name studied) and Middle Welsh but rare in modern Welsh). A similar structure, no longer in use, probably accounts for the
fe and
mi particles in Welsh. You can imagine how much fun linguists have arguing exactly how and when it happened.
[/tangent]