High centre of gravity for touring

Cycle-touring, Expeditions, Adventures, Major cycle routes NOT LeJoG (see other special board)
uppadine
Posts: 128
Joined: 30 Jan 2009, 11:48pm

High centre of gravity for touring

Post by uppadine »

I'm a fan of the Arkel Tailrider bag and in general believe that bags are better lower down. I just can't believe that a bike can be stable loaded like this, https://www.arkel-od.com/en/bikepacking-bags.html or am I just getting old? The bottom image especially.
khain
Posts: 245
Joined: 5 Feb 2014, 5:42pm

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by khain »

Why not? The weight is in the same place a rider would be.

You're not talking much weight anyway. I think the low-centre-of-gravity aspect of panniers is less important than some make out.
mnichols
Posts: 1465
Joined: 22 Apr 2013, 4:29pm

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by mnichols »

I favour panniers for touring on the road, but when you are off road then can snag on bushes, rocks, etc or get dragged through puddles and streams. So the idea is that for off road touring you hold your luggage higher and out of the way

It also allows you to tour if your bike won't take a rack, and if you are travelling fast and light it can be more aerodynamic

I have both setups. I prefer panniers, but their is definitely a place for bike packing
irc
Posts: 5195
Joined: 3 Dec 2008, 2:22pm
Location: glasgow

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by irc »

IMO it depends on the weight. Sleeping bag and a bit of clothing sure. Heavy items it looks like a lot of strain on the saddle.
User avatar
NATURAL ANKLING
Posts: 13780
Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 10:43pm
Location: English Riviera

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by NATURAL ANKLING »

Hi,
All metal frames and seat posts it looks like?
I have a bike well several with no lugs and am thinking on best way, but prefer a bit lower on the pack so mine will be seat post mounted with some other struts? Probably homemade.
NA Thinks Just End 2 End Return + Bivvy - Some day Soon I hope
You'll Still Find Me At The Top Of A Hill
Please forgive the poor Grammar I blame it on my mobile and phat thinkers.
User avatar
Heltor Chasca
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Aug 2014, 8:18pm
Location: Near Bath & The Mendips in Somerset

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by Heltor Chasca »

You won't load a seat pack up to more than about 5kg (fairly typical manufacturer weight recommendation iirc when I was shopping for one) so it's ok.

The 2 heaviest points on a human body is the head and hips according to my climbing coach from years ago. I'm sure we haven't evolved since then [emoji6]The bag sits at about hip height.
rualexander
Posts: 2645
Joined: 2 Jul 2007, 9:47pm
Contact:

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by rualexander »

Folks have been using saddlebags and barbags for years, this is no different, just an updated modernised twist on it.
Tangled Metal
Posts: 9509
Joined: 13 Feb 2015, 8:32pm

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by Tangled Metal »

Google old cycle tourists. I bet you'll see photos of more than a few with bedrolls on the handlebars and saddlebags. Perhaps even stuff within the frame. Nothing much is truly new!
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16148
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by 531colin »

There is a big difference between putting your bodyweight on the saddle and putting it on the pedals.
How high your luggage is fixed is secondary to that.
However, if you don't want shimmy (and you don't!) its best to keep as much weight as you can in front of the back wheel axle, lower than your saddle, and not flapping around.
pete75
Posts: 16370
Joined: 24 Jul 2007, 2:37pm

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by pete75 »

uppadine wrote:I'm a fan of the Arkel Tailrider bag and in general believe that bags are better lower down. I just can't believe that a bike can be stable loaded like this, https://www.arkel-od.com/en/bikepacking-bags.html or am I just getting old? The bottom image especially.


Nothing intrinsically wrong with it and used for a specific purpose. The saddle pack looks remarkably similar to the Carradice SQR Tour. Main difference is the Carradice is made of tougher, longer lasting material, holds a litre more and costs 85 quid as opposed to the Arkels 189.99.

Image
'Give me my bike, a bit of sunshine - and a stop-off for a lunchtime pint - and I'm a happy man.' - Reg Baker
mercalia
Posts: 14630
Joined: 22 Sep 2013, 10:03pm
Location: london South

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by mercalia »

irrespective of riding, a high load makes the bike unstable when handling when not cycling, inclined to want to fall over? and harder to push?
User avatar
Heltor Chasca
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Aug 2014, 8:18pm
Location: Near Bath & The Mendips in Somerset

High centre of gravity for touring

Post by Heltor Chasca »

rualexander wrote:Folks have been using saddlebags and barbags for years, this is no different, just an updated modernised twist on it.


That's right. My barbag has never been heavier than 2.5kg and the seat pack 5kg. The seat bags will evolve. They are handy having experienced touring off road along washed out gullies. Panniers don't fit [emoji53]and it's a pain taking your luggage off and doing shuttles. I don't believe the seat packs are perfect yet as they all wiggle a bit. Someone will crack it soon.

I've seen a few Audaxers using seat packs instead of rack packs. It's a good look.
Last edited by Heltor Chasca on 17 Dec 2016, 9:02am, edited 1 time in total.
nmnm
Posts: 470
Joined: 14 Nov 2010, 6:03pm

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by nmnm »

As I see it, if you try to balance a pool cue upright in the palm of your hand, it's much harder with the thick end at the bottom. Balance is maintained by moving the base point around, same with cycling. I carried a big bag of clothes on my crossbar once, was struck by the stability when moving (not so great when stationary!).
landsurfer
Posts: 5327
Joined: 27 Oct 2012, 9:13pm

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by landsurfer »

531colin wrote:There is a big difference between putting your bodyweight on the saddle and putting it on the pedals.
How high your luggage is fixed is secondary to that.
However, if you don't want shimmy (and you don't!) its best to keep as much weight as you can in front of the back wheel axle, lower than your saddle, and not flapping around.


So that would be the rider.... and any mass behind the axle is off set by the mass in front of it.
Surely to cause shimmy the masses would have to be out of balance.
Mass behind the axle => the rider ?
“Quiet, calm deliberation disentangles every knot.”
Be more Mike.
The road goes on forever.
pwa
Posts: 17428
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: High centre of gravity for touring

Post by pwa »

pete75 wrote:
uppadine wrote:I'm a fan of the Arkel Tailrider bag and in general believe that bags are better lower down. I just can't believe that a bike can be stable loaded like this, https://www.arkel-od.com/en/bikepacking-bags.html or am I just getting old? The bottom image especially.


Nothing intrinsically wrong with it and used for a specific purpose. The saddle pack looks remarkably similar to the Carradice SQR Tour. Main difference is the Carradice is made of tougher, longer lasting material, holds a litre more and costs 85 quid as opposed to the Arkels 189.99.

Image


I gave up using an SQR Tour about 10 years ago because it resulted in a wobble at high speed. Too much weight in the wrong place, and with an ability to move just a fraction from side to side to set off a tremor down the bike. I went back to a small pannier and the problem went away.

I have also used Carradice rack top bags and they are rock solid on a wider rack (Tortec Ultralite) and that inability to sway means there is no handling problem. I think it is the wobble of bags sticking out behind the saddle that creates problems, more than the height above the ground.
Last edited by pwa on 17 Dec 2016, 10:57pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply