High centre of gravity for touring
High centre of gravity for touring
I'm a fan of the Arkel Tailrider bag and in general believe that bags are better lower down. I just can't believe that a bike can be stable loaded like this, https://www.arkel-od.com/en/bikepacking-bags.html or am I just getting old? The bottom image especially.
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
Why not? The weight is in the same place a rider would be.
You're not talking much weight anyway. I think the low-centre-of-gravity aspect of panniers is less important than some make out.
You're not talking much weight anyway. I think the low-centre-of-gravity aspect of panniers is less important than some make out.
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
I favour panniers for touring on the road, but when you are off road then can snag on bushes, rocks, etc or get dragged through puddles and streams. So the idea is that for off road touring you hold your luggage higher and out of the way
It also allows you to tour if your bike won't take a rack, and if you are travelling fast and light it can be more aerodynamic
I have both setups. I prefer panniers, but their is definitely a place for bike packing
It also allows you to tour if your bike won't take a rack, and if you are travelling fast and light it can be more aerodynamic
I have both setups. I prefer panniers, but their is definitely a place for bike packing
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
IMO it depends on the weight. Sleeping bag and a bit of clothing sure. Heavy items it looks like a lot of strain on the saddle.
- NATURAL ANKLING
- Posts: 13780
- Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 10:43pm
- Location: English Riviera
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
Hi,
All metal frames and seat posts it looks like?
I have a bike well several with no lugs and am thinking on best way, but prefer a bit lower on the pack so mine will be seat post mounted with some other struts? Probably homemade.
All metal frames and seat posts it looks like?
I have a bike well several with no lugs and am thinking on best way, but prefer a bit lower on the pack so mine will be seat post mounted with some other struts? Probably homemade.
NA Thinks Just End 2 End Return + Bivvy - Some day Soon I hope
You'll Still Find Me At The Top Of A Hill
Please forgive the poor Grammar I blame it on my mobile and phat thinkers.
You'll Still Find Me At The Top Of A Hill
Please forgive the poor Grammar I blame it on my mobile and phat thinkers.
- Heltor Chasca
- Posts: 3016
- Joined: 30 Aug 2014, 8:18pm
- Location: Near Bath & The Mendips in Somerset
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
You won't load a seat pack up to more than about 5kg (fairly typical manufacturer weight recommendation iirc when I was shopping for one) so it's ok.
The 2 heaviest points on a human body is the head and hips according to my climbing coach from years ago. I'm sure we haven't evolved since then [emoji6]The bag sits at about hip height.
The 2 heaviest points on a human body is the head and hips according to my climbing coach from years ago. I'm sure we haven't evolved since then [emoji6]The bag sits at about hip height.
-
- Posts: 2645
- Joined: 2 Jul 2007, 9:47pm
- Contact:
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
Folks have been using saddlebags and barbags for years, this is no different, just an updated modernised twist on it.
-
- Posts: 9509
- Joined: 13 Feb 2015, 8:32pm
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
Google old cycle tourists. I bet you'll see photos of more than a few with bedrolls on the handlebars and saddlebags. Perhaps even stuff within the frame. Nothing much is truly new!
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
There is a big difference between putting your bodyweight on the saddle and putting it on the pedals.
How high your luggage is fixed is secondary to that.
However, if you don't want shimmy (and you don't!) its best to keep as much weight as you can in front of the back wheel axle, lower than your saddle, and not flapping around.
How high your luggage is fixed is secondary to that.
However, if you don't want shimmy (and you don't!) its best to keep as much weight as you can in front of the back wheel axle, lower than your saddle, and not flapping around.
Bike fitting D.I.Y. .....http://wheel-easy.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/bike-set-up-2017a.pdf
Tracks in the Dales etc...http://www.flickr.com/photos/52358536@N06/collections/
Tracks in the Dales etc...http://www.flickr.com/photos/52358536@N06/collections/
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
uppadine wrote:I'm a fan of the Arkel Tailrider bag and in general believe that bags are better lower down. I just can't believe that a bike can be stable loaded like this, https://www.arkel-od.com/en/bikepacking-bags.html or am I just getting old? The bottom image especially.
Nothing intrinsically wrong with it and used for a specific purpose. The saddle pack looks remarkably similar to the Carradice SQR Tour. Main difference is the Carradice is made of tougher, longer lasting material, holds a litre more and costs 85 quid as opposed to the Arkels 189.99.
'Give me my bike, a bit of sunshine - and a stop-off for a lunchtime pint - and I'm a happy man.' - Reg Baker
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
irrespective of riding, a high load makes the bike unstable when handling when not cycling, inclined to want to fall over? and harder to push?
- Heltor Chasca
- Posts: 3016
- Joined: 30 Aug 2014, 8:18pm
- Location: Near Bath & The Mendips in Somerset
High centre of gravity for touring
rualexander wrote:Folks have been using saddlebags and barbags for years, this is no different, just an updated modernised twist on it.
That's right. My barbag has never been heavier than 2.5kg and the seat pack 5kg. The seat bags will evolve. They are handy having experienced touring off road along washed out gullies. Panniers don't fit [emoji53]and it's a pain taking your luggage off and doing shuttles. I don't believe the seat packs are perfect yet as they all wiggle a bit. Someone will crack it soon.
I've seen a few Audaxers using seat packs instead of rack packs. It's a good look.
Last edited by Heltor Chasca on 17 Dec 2016, 9:02am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
As I see it, if you try to balance a pool cue upright in the palm of your hand, it's much harder with the thick end at the bottom. Balance is maintained by moving the base point around, same with cycling. I carried a big bag of clothes on my crossbar once, was struck by the stability when moving (not so great when stationary!).
-
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 27 Oct 2012, 9:13pm
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
531colin wrote:There is a big difference between putting your bodyweight on the saddle and putting it on the pedals.
How high your luggage is fixed is secondary to that.
However, if you don't want shimmy (and you don't!) its best to keep as much weight as you can in front of the back wheel axle, lower than your saddle, and not flapping around.
So that would be the rider.... and any mass behind the axle is off set by the mass in front of it.
Surely to cause shimmy the masses would have to be out of balance.
Mass behind the axle => the rider ?
“Quiet, calm deliberation disentangles every knot.”
Be more Mike.
The road goes on forever.
Be more Mike.
The road goes on forever.
Re: High centre of gravity for touring
pete75 wrote:uppadine wrote:I'm a fan of the Arkel Tailrider bag and in general believe that bags are better lower down. I just can't believe that a bike can be stable loaded like this, https://www.arkel-od.com/en/bikepacking-bags.html or am I just getting old? The bottom image especially.
Nothing intrinsically wrong with it and used for a specific purpose. The saddle pack looks remarkably similar to the Carradice SQR Tour. Main difference is the Carradice is made of tougher, longer lasting material, holds a litre more and costs 85 quid as opposed to the Arkels 189.99.
I gave up using an SQR Tour about 10 years ago because it resulted in a wobble at high speed. Too much weight in the wrong place, and with an ability to move just a fraction from side to side to set off a tremor down the bike. I went back to a small pannier and the problem went away.
I have also used Carradice rack top bags and they are rock solid on a wider rack (Tortec Ultralite) and that inability to sway means there is no handling problem. I think it is the wobble of bags sticking out behind the saddle that creates problems, more than the height above the ground.
Last edited by pwa on 17 Dec 2016, 10:57pm, edited 1 time in total.