Well worth the very enjoyable read with the last page's summation being spot on IMO
Thanks to the poster Peter Jones
Enjoy

pwa wrote:I like the bloke's bike, with its lack of suspension and its no-nonsense simplicity, but if it were me I would have a rack on it if only to get rid of that back pack. Even when walking I endure a back pack, with the sweat patch and the unwanted extra something around the shoulders, but to put up with it on a bike where there are alternatives seems unnecessary.
But there would be no point in telling him. Because, like me, he has arrived at his own optimal set-up that suits his own way of looking at things, so for him it must be right. Each to his or her own, I suppose.
reohn2 wrote:Just read this on Cycleblaze.com:- https://www.cycleblaze.com/journals/relics/intro/
Well worth the very enjoyable read with the last page's summation being spot on IMO
Thanks to the poster Peter Jones
Enjoy
Mike_Ayling wrote:reohn2 wrote:Just read this on Cycleblaze.com:- https://www.cycleblaze.com/journals/relics/intro/
Well worth the very enjoyable read with the last page's summation being spot on IMO
Thanks to the poster Peter Jones
Enjoy
I am a CycleBlaze member and check in daily.
I really enjoyed it too.
Mike
reohn2 wrote:Just read this on Cycleblaze.com:- https://www.cycleblaze.com/journals/relics/intro/
Well worth the very enjoyable read with the last page's summation being spot on IMO
Thanks to the poster Peter Jones
Enjoy