Brooks Cambium C17

Please be fair and thoughtful in your opinions. No rants please.
User avatar
Colin63
Posts: 1075
Joined: 31 Aug 2008, 9:46am
Location: Lancaster

Brooks Cambium C17

Postby Colin63 » 23 Jan 2014, 6:52pm

I fitted a Brooks Cambium C17 to the bike today and took off for a ride.

These are my first thoughts:

The saddle is beautifully constructed. It feels very solid, but it's lighter than the old B17. It's distinctive looking with it's unusually textured top, and I think very stylish and sleek. The rubber moulding allows for a more cut away line than the B17, though the sitting area seems almost the same.
To ride it feels like a half-broken-in Brooks, That is that the shape is just like the B17 but it's much firmer than a fully broken-in saddle (the reason I'd decided to replace the B17 was because mine just didn't seem to stop stretching and the leather was too soft - I was finding that the frame was starting to distort too). The shock of the firmness didn't last long. I went on a three hour ride along muddy tracks and hilly back roads and fast main roads and pretty much forgot the saddle was there, it was very good. One of the best improvements I noticed was that where I chose to perch my bum is where my bum stayed. It's grippy and there's no sliding about. Also it got splattered with wet mud, and it didn't matter cos this is a Brooks that is weather and water resistant! I like it a lot.

User avatar
Sooper8
Posts: 802
Joined: 20 Aug 2012, 7:53am
Location: Midlands

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby Sooper8 » 25 Jan 2014, 10:42pm

Thanks for that review Colin.

I saw when these were previewed on Brooks web site. I am interested to try one but can't really justify the new price , so will wait till a few second hand ones come up.
Everything you love,everything meaningful with depth & history,all passionate authentic experiences will be appropriated,mishandled,watered down,cheapened, repackaged,marketed & sold to the people you hate

The Mechanic
Posts: 1922
Joined: 23 Jul 2010, 1:38pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby The Mechanic » 26 Jan 2014, 11:15am

I applied to get on the trial programme but no luck. :(
Cancer changes your outlook on life. Change yours before it changes you.

User avatar
Sooper8
Posts: 802
Joined: 20 Aug 2012, 7:53am
Location: Midlands

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby Sooper8 » 26 Jan 2014, 11:52am

The Mechanic wrote:I applied to get on the trial programme but no luck. :(


And me... :cry:
Everything you love,everything meaningful with depth & history,all passionate authentic experiences will be appropriated,mishandled,watered down,cheapened, repackaged,marketed & sold to the people you hate

User avatar
Colin63
Posts: 1075
Joined: 31 Aug 2008, 9:46am
Location: Lancaster

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby Colin63 » 9 Mar 2014, 12:17pm

A quick update. I've been riding the Cambium for several weeks now and I've not found a single thing to complain about. It's the most comfortable saddle I've ever ridden on. I much prefer it to the B17. T'is a piece of classy kit.

Psamathe
Posts: 11576
Joined: 10 Jan 2014, 8:56pm

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby Psamathe » 9 Mar 2014, 3:16pm

Some time ago I read several negative reviews and was put-off". Main negatives related to the textured finish.

Comments were made about how the texture holds water when wet and allows dirt to collect in the material.
Also, comments were made about it being very high wear on clothes.

These were from people claiming to use them.

I suspect the C15 might be my ideal saddle (though having never even tried a C17 I suspect the superb looks might be biassing me). Are the negative comments justified in any way or are they just part of the "you can read anything you want to hear on the internet".

Ian

User avatar
Colin63
Posts: 1075
Joined: 31 Aug 2008, 9:46am
Location: Lancaster

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby Colin63 » 9 Mar 2014, 9:30pm

I was slightly worried about the texture of the finish affecting clothing, but it hasn't. I can't comment on whether the cotton finish will hold water as mine hasn't become wet.

I suspect that the colour will change and that dirt could become ingrained, but equally I reckon that it could be easily cleaned with a little detergent if that's a problem.

I too had heard a few doubts, but I'm as happy as Larry.

User avatar
CREPELLO
Posts: 5558
Joined: 29 Nov 2008, 12:55am

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby CREPELLO » 16 Mar 2014, 7:06pm

Colin63 wrote:I can't comment on whether the cotton finish will hold water as mine hasn't become wet.
I suppose you could always give it some Proofhide :wink:

alanf1968
Posts: 60
Joined: 2 Mar 2011, 1:23pm

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby alanf1968 » 16 Mar 2014, 10:00pm

Hi Colin

I have bought a Canbium and tried it on a couple of bikes, but I am a 100% Brooks B17 rider, I hoped it would be the same but currently find it too firm, I have only done a couple of short rides but ready to call it a day with mine and stick with the B17, has the C17 improved in comfort, I was under the impression there is no breaking in period with the C17
Brooks B17, Carradice saddlebag and a steel frame..... the signs of a true touring cyclist

User avatar
Colin63
Posts: 1075
Joined: 31 Aug 2008, 9:46am
Location: Lancaster

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby Colin63 » 17 Mar 2014, 8:27am

It hasn't become more comfortable, but I sit better on it than I did on the B17, on which I slipped around. The longest time I've ridden it is about 5 hours - last weekend, out in the rolling hills northwest of Lancaster. Even when tired I remained perched on the back.

alanf1968
Posts: 60
Joined: 2 Mar 2011, 1:23pm

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby alanf1968 » 17 Mar 2014, 2:49pm

Thanks Colin, I will let mine go, its sightly too firm for my likings, although I wouldn*t take my comments as critical, I really do like the Canbium, but I have had lightweight bikes, with skinny tyres and hard little saddles, ridden them happily for hours, but I now ride a cross/touring frame, wider tyres, B17 and saddlebag and stubbornly unwilling to compromise any of that comfort
Brooks B17, Carradice saddlebag and a steel frame..... the signs of a true touring cyclist

Richard D
Posts: 257
Joined: 27 Sep 2011, 6:16pm

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby Richard D » 22 Jul 2014, 3:48pm

I tried one yesterday, thinking that it offered some key advantages over the B17 I use at present (longer rails, waterproof, no mucking about with the tension).

I must have got lucky with my B17, which feels a little like a comfy armchair. The Cambium, on the other hand, felt too wide, a bit too bouncy, and too hard. I hated it after 100 yards, and 10 miles later I was of the same opinion. 100 miles on this thing is not gooing to do me any good. Put the B17 back on and was instantly reminded of why I've been using it for the last year.

Maybe the C15 will work a little better for me, but I'm not as eager to try it as I was. It's just a shame that the rails on the B17 are so short.

samsbike
Posts: 1144
Joined: 13 Oct 2012, 2:05pm

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby samsbike » 30 Jul 2014, 10:31am

Richard D wrote:I tried one yesterday, thinking that it offered some key advantages over the B17 I use at present (longer rails, waterproof, no mucking about with the tension).

I must have got lucky with my B17, which feels a little like a comfy armchair. The Cambium, on the other hand, felt too wide, a bit too bouncy, and too hard. I hated it after 100 yards, and 10 miles later I was of the same opinion. 100 miles on this thing is not gooing to do me any good. Put the B17 back on and was instantly reminded of why I've been using it for the last year.

Maybe the C15 will work a little better for me, but I'm not as eager to try it as I was. It's just a shame that the rails on the B17 are so short.


Out of interest why do you feel its too wide?

Richard D
Posts: 257
Joined: 27 Sep 2011, 6:16pm

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby Richard D » 13 Aug 2014, 10:31pm

Because it felt that way? And - FWVLIW - it looked a little wider than how my B17 looks. Maybe the B17 I have has broken in that way, but it fits my bum; the C17 *felt* wider - perhaps because it doesn't give in the same way in the same places.

I hate the fact that the B17 so restricts what seatposts I can use, and how I can mount/adjust them on my particular bike. I just wish that I could find another saddle that still felt OK to sit on after 100 miles like the B17 does.

User avatar
georgew
Posts: 1526
Joined: 27 Jan 2007, 4:23pm

Re: Brooks Cambium C17

Postby georgew » 14 Aug 2014, 11:19am

Richard D wrote:Because it felt that way? And - FWVLIW - it looked a little wider than how my B17 looks. Maybe the B17 I have has broken in that way, but it fits my bum; the C17 *felt* wider - perhaps because it doesn't give in the same way in the same places.

I hate the fact that the B17 so restricts what seatposts I can use, and how I can mount/adjust them on my particular bike. I just wish that I could find another saddle that still felt OK to sit on after 100 miles like the B17 does.


You can always try the Spa"Nidd" saddle which has the same dimensions as the B17 but has longer rails.