charliepolecat wrote:After Andy's disastrous lack of organisational skills for the Inverness 1200, I doubt very much if he will be foolish enough to put this one on.
That sounds ominous. Care to elucidate?
charliepolecat wrote:After Andy's disastrous lack of organisational skills for the Inverness 1200, I doubt very much if he will be foolish enough to put this one on.
charliepolecat wrote:I know this is the LeJog forum, but if one wanted to undertake an AudaxUK event that is well organised, (unlike Inverness 1200) well run, well supported and has the advantage of being out-and-back, this is the one to do: https://londonedinburghlondon.com/
PH wrote:charliepolecat wrote:I know this is the LeJog forum, but if one wanted to undertake an AudaxUK event that is well organised, (unlike Inverness 1200) well run, well supported and has the advantage of being out-and-back, this is the one to do: https://londonedinburghlondon.com/
Please do share your experiences of doing LEL and the Inverness 1200. On the face of it LEL and the LEJoG look such completely different events that it's hard to see why anyone would choose between them. I haven't done either, though I have done a couple of other events by the Inverness organiser and wouldn't hesitate to do another.
mattheus wrote:I'm not so sure ... one of the joys of audax is the "broad church". even I've done quite a wide variety of events under their umbrella - others are even more eclectic! I know what you're saying - there are big differences betwixt the two; but they are both unsupported rides of a similar length, with about the same (minimum) average speed.
charliepolecat wrote:My advice if he tries to put this on is to stay away, that way you will not have given him money and then been disappointed - and be out of pocket.