thirdcrank wrote:bertgrower wrote: ... How do you measure benefits? ...
I was tempted to ask you that when you resurrected the thread and then I decided against. Now you have posed the supplementary question, I'd be interested to hear your own measures.
IMHO
It must be membership numbers , it indicates that we are relevent to todays cyclists. Numbers of members increase our ability to be inderpendent from HMG which given the recent incident at Old St may be need for the responable cycling community to campaign against any over reaction that could prompt laws that are over the top.