
Will we have to rename the For Sale board the CTC Charity Shop?
Simon L6 wrote:I'm telling you readers, the thought of being on an all night ride with Workhard and Greg swapping Charity Management qualifications is the only thing that's getting me through the day....................
workhard wrote:Simon L6 wrote:I'm telling you readers, the thought of being on an all night ride with Workhard and Greg swapping Charity Management qualifications is the only thing that's getting me through the day....................
adopts careworn and world weary pose
"Charity Management. I was a charity manager once." Stares rheumily into the middle distance "'ardest game in the world, I was on this fundraising campaign once up Dartford way......" drones on until dawn. Zzzzzz
toontra wrote:Can we assume that the fact the site has been down for a few days and there is a general hush on the issue is an indication that things are going on behind the scenes? Perhaps in lieu of the meeting this week?
gaz wrote:I assume you have outsourced the necessary IT work to a charitable trust. In so doing you can achieve tax savings and maximise value for savethectc's members.
Simon L6 wrote:Hot news! We (by which I mean Councillors, yrs truly and Colin) have all been invited to a meeting at National Office. Dates are being sorted out. This could be a bit of a breakthrough! Hope springs eternal!
gaz wrote:Simon L6 wrote:Hot news! We (by which I mean Councillors, yrs truly and Colin) have all been invited to a meeting at National Office. Dates are being sorted out. This could be a bit of a breakthrough! Hope springs eternal!
Whilst appreciating that only Colin was expected to be able attend the meeting yesterday, did it go ahead and when might we hear more?
Simon L6 wrote: ... I made the point, and it wasn't one he appreciated, that the 'pro' campaign had repeatedly shot itself in the foot - the Great E-Mail Scandal being the prime case in point. ...
Simon L6 wrote:Kevin believes that people will vote on the numbers. He wanted me to agree that the numbers were fine. I wouldn't do this, although, as I say, the thing is ongoing....
thirdcrank wrote:Simon L6 wrote: ... I made the point, and it wasn't one he appreciated, that the 'pro' campaign had repeatedly shot itself in the foot - the Great E-Mail Scandal being the prime case in point. ...
The enthusiasm, bordering on glee, with which the various emails have been widely publicised by the people they were supposed to outwit should have been a bit of a clue.