Snakes wrote: .... me as Returning Officer at CTC National Office (peter.jackson@ctc.org.uk)....
Just out of interest, if Peter is the returning officer, why are we sending our ballot papers back to Kevin Mayne?
John
Snakes wrote: .... me as Returning Officer at CTC National Office (peter.jackson@ctc.org.uk)....
Snakes wrote:Any questions or problems associated with voting forms should be referred to me as Returning Officer at CTC National Office (peter.jackson@ctc.org.uk). All errors will be investigated. Replacement voting forms will be issued if necessary or appropriate.
Peter Jackson
Operations Director / Returning Officer
PLEASE NOTE: THIS POST HAS BEEN PLACED BY CTC STAFF ON BEHALF OF PETER. ANY ISSUES IN RELATION TO THE BALLOT PAPERS SHOULD BE SENT DIRECTLY TO PETER AS PER HIS REQUEST.
swansonj wrote:Snakes wrote: .... me as Returning Officer at CTC National Office (peter.jackson@ctc.org.uk)....
Just out of interest, if Peter is the returning officer, why are we sending our ballot papers back to Kevin Mayne?
John
Yorkshireman wrote:Welcome to the Forum clem the moderniser.
I don't think that there's any whingeing going on. This vote is likely to be quite important and taking that into account I (personally) think that this particular voting system appears to be less than well organized considering the number of errors re ballot papers noted on here (and YACF), not to mention the way that it's going to be run ie Who will be counting and tallying the votes? Who will verify the tally? What confidentially issues might there be ?
Dear Gary,
I am really sorry that your voting form is incorrect. I admit that yours is not an isolated instance as I have had - to date - six other errors reported to me, all of which have been corrected. Whilst this is six too many, and I suspect more will arise in the coming weeks, it must be remembered that we have nearly 67,000 members, so the number of errors needs to be put into perspective.
With regard to "mystery member", he is a Household member of CTC and he has mistakenly been linked to your record instead of his wife's record. This incorrect linking has been the cause of all the errors that I have investigated.
With regard to your other point, I do not understand the double entry for your son as this is inconsistent with our membership database and the data file used create the voting papers where there is only one entry for your son. I have used the same data to create a replacement voting form for you without "mystery member's" name on it and this has only one entry for your son. The replacement voting form for you will be sent out next week, but I would be very grateful indeed if you are able either to scan the original form and email it to me or post it to me personally so that I can investigate this further.
Once again, please accept my apologies for the error,
Regards, Peter