Yet more victim blaming & helmet effectiveness assumptions
Re: Yet more victim blaming & helmet effectiveness assumptions
squeaker wrote:Police & coroner this time:(
Excessive speed wasn't a issue - do you think he was exceeding the 12mph rating of a bicycle helmet?
Re: Yet more victim blaming & helmet effectiveness assumptions
kwackers wrote: do you think he was exceeding the 12mph rating of a bicycle helmet?
Witness - "She told the inquest she saw the schoolgirl being thrown over the car by the impact."
Quite possibly...
-
- Posts: 2645
- Joined: 2 Jul 2007, 9:47pm
- Contact:
Re: Yet more victim blaming & helmet effectiveness assumptions
Saw this in the TV listings for 24 Hours in A&E
So they wouldn't have bothered sending him for a CT scan if he had been wearing a helmet?
So they wouldn't have bothered sending him for a CT scan if he had been wearing a helmet?
Re: Yet more victim blaming & helmet effectiveness assumptions
I knew those helmets were good, but not that good!
The cyclist has spinal, abdominal and chest injuries, yet the reason for the CT is "not wearing a helmet"
I wonder just hw the helmet would have saved him from the other injuries
Then of course, there were the epileptic and the elderly man , both suffered exactly the type of head injury that a helmet could have prevented
Typical selection of helmet hypocrisy
The cyclist has spinal, abdominal and chest injuries, yet the reason for the CT is "not wearing a helmet"
I wonder just hw the helmet would have saved him from the other injuries
Then of course, there were the epileptic and the elderly man , both suffered exactly the type of head injury that a helmet could have prevented
Typical selection of helmet hypocrisy